• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Riots erupt in Tehran over 'stolen' election

If this goes past the 1999/2003 occurances to actual revolt then the "protestors" will be slaughtered and the "world" will do nothing.

What are the "world's" options?
 
Supporting them .
 
Did I see that right? They knocked that police guy off his bike and stuff, and then escorted him to a spot where they could treat his wounds?

Here's another:


Supporters of Mir Hossein Mousavi try to calm down fellow demonstrators as they rescue a bloodied riot policeman (center) who was beaten during a protest in Valiasr Street in Tehran on June 13, 2009. (BEHROUZ MEHRI/AFP/Getty Images)


A backer of Mir Hossein Mousavi helps evacuate an injured riot-police officer during riots in Tehran on June 13, 2009. (OLIVIER LABAN-MATTEI/AFP/Getty Images)

Source
 
...
Support them how?


BY backing their efforts verbally and clearly as France and much of the EU has. Or like Represetatrive Pence has (http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...ntroduces-resolution-iran.html#post1058086567)

..not like the Obama USA has.


If it goes past this by supporting them with weaponry intelligence etc.

IOW supporting them as in supporting them for real in the real world instead of waxing poetic about idealistic BS on Twitter. Or worrying more about a photo op BSathon.




That you guys even have to ask tells me your just looking for a way to say "Sitting on our asses is mighty fine" in nifty ways.
 
BY backing their efforts verbally and clearly as France and much of the EU has. Or like Represetatrive Pence has (http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...ntroduces-resolution-iran.html#post1058086567)

..not like the Obama USA has.

It is not prudent to call a regime illegitimate if it may survive and we may need to negotiate with it. If the protesters gain the upper hand, Obama can THEN take sides.

American interference in Iranian politics is NOT desirable to anyone involved. The establishment would use it as a pretext to crack down on the protesters, the protesters would resent American involvement, and the United States would be more likely to have to negotiate with a hardline establishment. But that's exactly what you want.

Triad said:
If it goes past this by supporting them with weaponry intelligence etc.

Who is "them"? Last I checked, the protesters have neither a military nor an intelligence bureau. If there is a revolution, it almost certainly will not be in the form of a civil war. There is no reason to provide "intelligence" to an angry mob which probably knows more about the situation than our government does. That's just retarded.


The fact that you respond to simple questions with such hostility indicates that you know your views are idealistic and indefensible.
 
Could we please keep the actions of the American government out of this thread? There are a few threads open for that already, and I don't want to see this thread cluttered with it.
 

See, that sort of stuff is touching, not being sarcastic.

They can knock the guy down, and some of them (unfortunately not the ones who caused the bleeding wounds) can find it in their hearts to take their "enemy" and give them aid and treatment. Very humane.
 
Iran Updates (VIDEO): Live-Blogging The Uprising

Reports of arrests last night and today. They've arrested human rights attorneys and personnel.

There's also reports of making the dead disappear and reporting vastly undercounted numbes of both dead and wounded.



The systemic "cleansing" of the voice of opposition withn Iran while Ahmedinejad is out of the country. SOP for suppresive regimes. I've been listening to the english translations of the State sponsored radio.... there's growing "noise" about the US being involved with the protestors. They haven't been so blatant as to name the US, yet. But, they are naming the "West" and using voice clips and comments by Limbaugh, O'Reilly...... Nothing about Pence, yet.
 
That we don't know for sure. When I was in Iran in 1987, I met more secular people than religious. I can't really tell because I never lived there, but that's the impression I got and that's what my Iranian friends tell me.

I'm not saying they are fundamentalists, but they are probably more attached to their religion than many Americans.
 

And that kind of treatment is very good for them strategically. It humanizes both the riot police and rioters. I think it could lead to police defections. The GC is already ordering the arrest of numerous military leaders they believe are at risk of siding with the protesters.

Good for the Iranians.
 
This whole situation is incredible -- how things have changed.

10-15 years ago, we'd never all this information, this fast.

20 years ago, events like this went unreported. Sadly, they probably still do in parts of the world.

It's been an incredible story to follow. My heart goes out to the citizens. Let's hope that, as much as possible, they stay out of harms way.
 
Could we please keep the actions of the American government out of this thread? There are a few threads open for that already, and I don't want to see this thread cluttered with it.

Would you agree that discussing what America should do at this juncture is fair game?
 
It is my belief we have been supporting the underground movement for some time. I believe we should step up our support of this new, overt movement and do all we can to help them keep their momentum. I'm talking the funneling of arms and information to the opposition. Assault rifles, sub machine guns, handguns, grenades, and anti-tank weapons. We have massive stockpiles of them in Iraq. Interrupt state run radio and initiate Radio Free Iran.
 
Some practical ways individuals can help the protesters.


Cyberwar guide for Iran elections - Boing Boing

 

At present, VOA is blocked in Iran. Our only transmitter is in Qatar. We need to establish a transmitter in Iraq.
 

No no no no nooooooo

That would be the absolute worst thing that we could possibly do. The Iranian regime is looking for a pretext to clobber the protesters, but it can't easily manufacture one without many members of the police and military refusing to obey and/or defecting to join the protesters.

Furthermore, if the Iranians decide to topple their government it won't be through a prolonged civil war. It will be through some kind of revolution. Whether it's peaceful like Czechoslovakia or bloody like Romania remains to be seen...but in neither case would it do any good to funnel arms to them.

For one thing, there has been little indication that the protesters would even welcome American involvement. For another thing, we have no way of getting massive stockpiles of weapons to protesters. For another thing, we don't even know who they are. For another thing, if we gave them to any "big name" protest figures to distribute, they would immediately be arrested. For another thing, the timeline of a potential revolution is much shorter than the timeline of our weapons supply chain. By the time the weapons got there, the government would already be overthrown or the protest would be crushed. And finally, if Iran's government DOES manage to survive (which is still more likely than not) we would be much better off if we had not just funded an armed insurrection against it.
 
Last edited:

Talk about getting caught up in the excitement and carried away.:shock:
 
The Iranians will let us know what they need. Right now they just need us to be vigilent and get the word out.



I keep seeing this, does anyone else know if it's true?

Liveleak.com instead of Youtube to upload videos...Youtube is deleting
 
Nice Analysis by Juan Cole:


 

According to you and Obama
..to me the USA isn't a nefarious evil nation which is the basis for your ability to declare how Iranians would react.


"If it goes beyond this point"--
The "protestors" better have support with guns or they will be slaughtered.
If they get that support we should support it.
They wont' if it occurs. Obama will do nothing and you will excuse his doing nothing.
Next time you try to imply I'm retarded you better respond to what I actually said.


The fact that you respond to simple questions with such hostility indicates that you know your views are idealistic and indefensible.

Is this the part where I act like I don't know whats behind talked about?
Nah I'm not that pathetic.

If I'm asked "how long does Iran get to negotiate" I say March 2010
...you say you can't read.
 
Last edited:



If it gets to the point that they actually turn into a revolutionary movement then thats exactly what we should.

I;d be confident we would do that if anyone else was President.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…