Not just food additives. American dairy farmers feed a growth hormone to their cattle that's banned in Canada and Europe but increases milk production by 10%.
The real difference between the left and right in this are is: Should there be regulations and standards put on manufacturers or should consumers just read the label and make their own choices?
how about we give it chance before we lose our minds,,
For more than 30 years now, I have paid attention to food ingredients. I probably end up paying at least 15% more than most people for the same types of food, and even more since I will buy things like Shrimp from Antarctic, salmon, etc.
Michelle Obama wanted clearer labeling. For example, she believed that portion sizes on a label should be what a consumer would actually consider a portion. For example, a candy bar should not be labeled as 2 servings as that would be misleading to consumers.
Only those who failed miserably at math.
He may be eccentric enough to not fall prey to the food lobbyist that have thoroughly and completely corrupted our government and the FDA.
The problem is that people often get a small bag of chips, see that it's 170 calories a serving, and eat the whole bag not realizing that it's 2.5 servings. It's deceptive labeling for consumers.
So often, we have little choice--either because the healthier is generally unavailable or it is priced extremely high.
So is it wrong now if RFK wants it?
our biggest problem isnt calorie intake its that we are eating whats considered toxic chemicals in most of the world,,
You must realize such labeling is purposely misleading. Misleading isn't a conservative value.
Of course not.
I don't think we need regulation. Labeling and proper determination into what if any any of these food additives have effects on people sure.
thats a regulation,,,
She sold out and caved to the food lobbyist and changed her campaign to be about exercise.