So, just your run-of-the-mill conspiracy theorist.He's an insane old man who stupidly bought into the anti-vax ignorance and wants to spread this ignorance like the plague. It's the endgame of most rabid anti-vaxxers. They think they've stumbled upon this huge, grand conspiracy, and that they're ever so smart for having figured out this huge grand conspiracy which isn't supported by fact, data, or study. And they want to parade around pretending they're so smart and everyone else is so stupid because they figured out this grand conspiracy and no one else did, and aren't they sooooo special because look at them figuring something out that cannot be demonstrated or proven, but that's just because everyone else is listening to shills....and science.....but they're soooooo dumb and can't see the huge, grand conspiracy.
Right-Wing Dumb**** says something.
Less intelligent Right-Wing Dumb**** believes it.
That's how this works.
And you believe it.
Real science weeds out the garbage studies and mistakes made by students/researchers needing to publish to further their careers.You should try reading what you are replying to because thats not accurate:
The MAHA draft’s citation error rate was ~2% (14 removals/520 citations).
By comparison, a Cochrane-style review across biomedical journals found a median citation error rate of 38% (range 4–67%), with many journals lacking any post-publication editing AT ALL.
I think its sadder than that.
Right wing dumbass says something.
Fairly intelligent right winger for some reason believes the bullshit.
The stupid lead those that could have stopped the process right off the cliff.
That is how this works.
But if they destroyed it, how would Kennedy know of it?The deep state obviously had it destroyed in the interest of big pharma, because you know they make so much more money off the vaccine than they do for treatment.
It costs $81 to vaccinate a kid against hepatitis B and about $11,5000 to medicate and treat hepatitis B. The math doesn't lie.
Yup. This is why you don't put stupid dumb **** conspiracy theorists in charge of actual science agencies. These ass****s have no concept of science, data, or analysis and just pretend they do and that they have stumbled on some grand conspiracy.So, just your run-of-the-mill conspiracy theorist.
But one with a LOT of power to hurt people.
How much more does it cost to take care of a severely autistic child?The deep state obviously had it destroyed in the interest of big pharma, because you know they make so much more money off the vaccine than they do for treatment.
It costs $81 to vaccinate a kid against hepatitis B and about $11,5000 to medicate and treat hepatitis B. The math doesn't lie.
Are you claiming those medical journals are real science?Real science weeds out the garbage studies and mistakes made by students/researchers needing to publish to further their careers.
Is this the CDC paper RFJ jr was talking about?Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002 - PubMed
Universal hepatitis B vaccination was recommended for U.S. newborns in 1991; however, safety findings are mixed. The association between hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and parental report of autism diagnosis was determined. This cross-sectional study used weighted probability samples...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Real science is reported in medical journals.Are you claiming those medical journals are real science?
lolSpeaking of those medical journals...
Kennedy pointed to the testimony of Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, who warned the public that it is “no longer a science journal.”
Instead, she called it a “vessel for pharmaceutical propaganda.”
Kennedy is shaking up the status quo by cutting ties with these captured publications and building something better.
“We’re going to stop NIH scientists from publishing there,” he said. “And we’re going to create our own journals in health in each of the institutions.”
He added that these new government-backed journals will become the “preeminent journals” in the world because they’ll be based on real science, not bought outcomes.
“If you get NIH funding,” Kennedy said, “it is anointing you as a good, legitimate scientist.”
Do you think anyone takes what you say seriously?Do you think anyone takes what you say seriously?
Autism in hereditary.How much more does it cost to take care of a severely autistic child?
Getting a single vaccine on the childhood schedule is 1 billion every single year. Huge money maker especially when they have multiple vaccines.
When You Don't Realise You are a ShillWell sure, if you're taking "information" from piracy shills.
Only so far as to say that autism is caused by vaccines.Autism in hereditary.
We have even traced what genes contribute to autism.
Shall we now tell individuals with autism that they can’t have children?
Just how far down this demonizing of autistic individuals rabbit hole do you want to go?
Real science is reported in medical journals.
Flawed science is called out by other studies and reported in those journals.
Accepted standards of practice are arrived at after consensus is reached by a majority of scientists and government agencies.
Yet… I bet he doesn’t honor her opinions on alternative medicine or single payer healthcareKennedy pointed to the testimony of Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, who warned the public that it is “no longer a science journal.”
Instead, she called it a “vessel for pharmaceutical propaganda.”
Misinformation like when the Biden administration said that if you got the covid vaccine you wouldn't get covid or transmit it?There's a special place in Hell for people who knowingly spread disinformation this harmful, and which will result in untold deaths.
Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002 - PubMed
Universal hepatitis B vaccination was recommended for U.S. newborns in 1991; however, safety findings are mixed. The association between hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and parental report of autism diagnosis was determined. This cross-sectional study used weighted probability samples...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
You post a rebuttal by some guy on X to bolster your argument? Dismissed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?