- Joined
- May 29, 2025
- Messages
- 157
- Reaction score
- 79
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Thomas Jefferson famously described the Revelation of John:
If someone drew a map in the year 1400, and then, upon discovering Florida, people noticed numerous points of similarity, they would think perhaps he had actually been to Florida.
Crossbows that could hit anywhere in the world and locusts with the faces of men were once the stuff of low fantasy. Yet in modern times we seem to read much more into the text of this book: intercontinental ballistic missiles, drones with video monitors and less-than-lethal weapons, the destruction of privacy online.I then considered it as merely the ravings of a Maniac, no more worthy, nor capable of explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams... I cannot so far respect them as to consider them as an allegorical narrative of events, past or subsequent. there is not coherence enough in them to countenance any suite of rational ideas... what has no meaning admits no explanation... I do not consider them as revelations of the supreme being, whom I would not so far blaspheme as to impute to him a pretension of revelation, couched at the same time in terms which, he would know, were never to be understood by those to whom they were addressed.
If someone drew a map in the year 1400, and then, upon discovering Florida, people noticed numerous points of similarity, they would think perhaps he had actually been to Florida.