• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans who backed Trump’s anti-environment bill have accepted over $105m from big oil

Allan

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
54,462
Reaction score
82,640
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Two things that don't exist in other advanced democracies: gerrymandering and the abominable practice below.

The wishes and very well being of Americans are irrelevant in the face of what can only be described as bribes.

The Republican lawmakers who voted for Donald Trump’s anti-environment tax and spending bill have accepted more than $105m in political donations from the fossil fuel industry, a new analysis has found, raising concerns about their relationship with big oil.

Signed into law last month, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes billions of dollars in giveaways to oil and gas companies and their executives, alongside provisions to scale back credits for clean vehicles, wind and solar which were enshrined by Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

 
Nothing remotely surprising there. Not one iota.

It's the conservative agenda in general anyway.
 
Two things that don't exist in other advanced democracies: gerrymandering and the abominable practice below.

The wishes and very well being of Americans are irrelevant in the face of what can only be described as bribes.



Laughable. LW silliness. Never heard of the group doing the "study". Did they compare how much Soros and other LW gazillionaires donated to Dems?
 
Two things that don't exist in other advanced democracies: gerrymandering and the abominable practice below.

The wishes and very well being of Americans are irrelevant in the face of what can only be described as bribes.




Republican politicians have also gotten billions of dollars from fossil fuel dictatorships during the last decades.




So they ignoring both the urgent need to reduce CO2 emissions and the economic opportunities.

 
Welfare queens
 
A little less corrupt is still corrupt.

I'm not referring to corruption, I'm referring to an anti-conservation agenda.
 
Two things that don't exist in other advanced democracies: gerrymandering and the abominable practice below.

The wishes and very well being of Americans are irrelevant in the face of what can only be described as bribes.




A situation made worse by the 2010 Citizens United decision by SCOTUS.

$$$$ = speech.
 
Two things that don't exist in other advanced democracies: gerrymandering and the abominable practice below.

The wishes and very well being of Americans are irrelevant in the face of what can only be described as bribes.



So what? All the folks in Congress accept money from the people they advocate for.
 
So what? All the folks in Congress accept money from the people they advocate for.

Republican voters also benefits from renewable energy while Republican politicians instead care about their wealthy donors



 
A little less corrupt is still corrupt.

The US seems extreme in that regard while the problem also exist in other countries. A big cause is the last decades of increased inequality that concentrated wealth and power to the economic elite.


While even under the corrupt Trump administration does progressive show it's possible to reduce the influence of big money. Like for example that Arizona democrats now reduce oligarchs influence over their primaries.

 
Back
Top Bottom