• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans are now arguing that teens (15-19yo) are NOT having enough babies which then INJURES their (red) states.

CaughtInThe

CaughtInThe

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 4, 2017
Messages
145,162
Reaction score
165,931
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Yeah. You read that right.

THEY NEED MORE BREEDERS and will pass LAWS (like outlawing the abortion pill) to make sure they get them some 'mo babies (for political power, etc).

****ing deplorable.



Image
 
Note that this isn't a NEW lawsuit. It's an existing one that they have added this "WE NEED MORE BREEDERS" crap on to.



 
CaughtInThe said:
Yeah. You read that right.

THEY NEED MORE BREEDERS and will pass LAWS (like outlawing the abortion pill) to make sure they get them some 'mo babies (for political power, etc).

****ing deplorable.



Image
Click to expand...
arent you supposed to provide some proof this is actually happening??
 
CaughtInThe said:
Image
Click to expand...

Compelling women/couples to produce offspring for the state. Perfect! Enter the 13th Amendment.

13th Amendment​
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction"​

My argument was developed around abortion but I can see how it fits here.

It would be govt use of force to demand women remain in a more risky and dangerous physical state without their consent...to serve society or the govt. Involuntary servitude.​
​
"Compelling state's interest?" compelling the woman without her consent, to serve the state's interest.​
​
Look at the wording...if you are forcing women to comply with a state's interest...what else is that? To risk their lives, their health without their consent, for the state. ?? It's involuntary servitude, slavery.​
​
...'involuntary servitude.' Consider what the words actually mean and the impacts on women's lives. The fact that it is indeed involuntary and women are being compelled to serve the state against their will.​

☮️ 🇺🇸 ☮️
 
CaughtInThe said:
Yeah. You read that right.

THEY NEED MORE BREEDERS and will pass LAWS (like outlawing the abortion pill) to make sure they get them some 'mo babies (for political power, etc).

****ing deplorable.



Image
Click to expand...

This is what we would see all the time under tRump Part 2. **** these disgusting maggots.
 
Women 15-19 yrs of age. How many women that age are married (even in the south :rolleyes:)

This is just another example of the right's blatant hypocrisy. The right blames so many of society's ills on single mothers, and yet by denying access to abortions, they are forcing single women that might choose otherwise...to become single mothers :rolleyes:

And then of course the bitching about having their tax dollars going to public assistance and day care to help support these families.

Hypocritical? It's insane.

☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
Lursa said:
Women 15-19 yrs of age. How many women that age are married (even in the south :rolleyes:)

This is just another example of the right's blatant hypocrisy. The right blames so many of society's ills on single mothers, and yet by denying access to abortions, they are forcing single women that might choose otherwise...to become single mothers :rolleyes:

And then of course the bitching about having their tax dollars going to public assistance and day care to help support these families.

Hypocritical? It's insane.

☮️🇺🇸☮️
Click to expand...
This
 
CaughtInThe said:
Yeah. You read that right.

THEY NEED MORE BREEDERS and will pass LAWS (like outlawing the abortion pill) to make sure they get them some 'mo babies (for political power, etc).

****ing deplorable.



Image
Click to expand...
Whatever happened to the whole “welfare queen” argument from the GOP???
I’m old enough to remember when “giving handouts” to folks that have children and need public assistance was verboten-

Ladies were reproducing just to live off the government teat? That was the complaint in the 90’s-

Newt Gingrich had a field day. Clinton signed “Welfare to Work” legislation in 1996, and to this day says it’s the thing he regrets most about his presidency.

And now it’s a 180 degree flip?
 
Doppelgangirl said:
Whatever happened to the whole “welfare queen” argument from the GOP???
I’m old enough to remember when “giving handouts” to folks that have children and need public assistance was verboten-

Ladies were reproducing just to live off the government teat? That was the complaint in the 90’s-

Newt Gingrich had a field day. Clinton signed “Welfare to Work” legislation in 1996, and to this day says it’s the thing he regrets most about his presidency.

And now it’s a 180 degree flip?
Click to expand...
The flow chart is color coded.
 
BirdinHand said:
And then they wonder why Gen Z heavily favors democrats and are turning out to vote in levels unseen in prior generations.
Click to expand...
I hope you’re right—
The gender divide amongst 18-29yo’s is a bit perplexing for me-

Weird times. And scary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom