If they just released them, they would have lost the opportunity to catch the publicans lying.
And the publicans were so stupid, they fell for it
AH, so when Carney stated that only 'one word' was changed then the emails refuted this...the GOP was stupid?
got it...
That is a lie
Carney didn't say that only one word was changed
Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 05/10/2013 | The White HouseMR. CARNEY: Well, thank you for that question...Again, this was all in response to a request from Congress. And the only edit made by the White House or the State Department to those talking points generated by the CIA was a change from -- referring to the facility that was attacked in Benghazi, from “consulate,” because it was not a consulate, to “diplomatic post.” I think I had referred to it as “diplomatic facility." I think it may have been “diplomatic post.”
What you're missing is a quote with Carney saying that only one word was changedEr uh, ok:
Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 05/10/2013 | The White House
Only edit...consulate.
Sure looks like one word to me...what am I missing?
Yep, GOP got the WH to release the ACTUAL emails finally after how long? go on you can say it
backfire indeed...:lamo
What you're missing is a quote with Carney saying that only one word was changed
The emails showed that the Whitehouse was not responsible for changing the talking points so yes it backfired. There is nothing left to talk about.
HUH? Are you being obtuse deliberately or is your reading comprehension too weak to understand the quote I posted previously? He clearly states 'one edit...consulate...to diplomatic post'.
So the portion of the 5/10/13 WH press conference that I posted in #178 where Carney states clearly 'And the only edit made by the White House' means they are somehow 'not responsible for changing the talking points'.
OH ****, I get it...standard liberal/progressive meme...'move along, nothing to see here'. Don't throw you shoulder out patting yourself on the back because you got me with that one!...:lamo
There were several edits to the talking points.
The White House is only responsible for one of them
I see you have to edit out a bunch of words to make the quote fit your dishonest claim
Prove it....
OK, put all the words back in and show how it means anything different...
...:coffeepap
the only edit made by the White House or the State Department to those talking points generated by the CIA was a change from -- referring to the facility that was attacked in Benghazi
You posted the proof (ie Carney's quote)
The above quote does not say "There was only one edit to the talking points"
Thank you for this! So you concur that the WH has 'blood' on their hands...ok, we're making progress.
Where did I say there was only one edit?
There were several edits to the talking points.
The White House is only responsible for one of them
Wa?No one said there was only one edit
Say wa???Yes, I proved that the WH was responsible for only one edit.
Wa?
Say wa???
In a deceitful literal sense the WH or State really didn't make any changes since they didn't sit down at a keyboard and change the source copy of the talking points.
They kept telling the CIA to make changes and the CIA did what they were told.
The irony is that the CIA talking points didn't talk about the video ... but Susan Rice did.
In addition, Petraeus thought they were so bad he wouldn't leave his fingerprints on them.
Yes, Obama loyalists musty be very proud of their guy ... very proud.
"There was only one edit" <> "The WH was responsible for only one edit"
Careful there...you're kinda looking pedantic...wouldn't ya say Sang?
OK, when did I say 'The WH was responsible for only one edit'?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?