- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Yep...and you are presenting yourself with the same credibility and viability as any other single issue voter. I hope at the very least you are a tea party supporter
Ive equated being a libertarian to peeing your pants
How many seats have you flipped since 2008? If you believe what you say, carry on, you are doing a great job as your attitude should lead to a filibuster proof Senate for the Republicans in 2012 along with the WH.
You helped. And, that helped us get ObamaCare. Be proud of your vote.
Logic and common sense don't be strong characteristics of libertarians.
Wow! And you like doing that in your pants?
Sorry, but I just could not pass up that line. LOL!
How many seats have you flipped since 2008? If you believe what you say, carry on, you are doing a great job as your attitude should lead to a filibuster proof Senate for the Republicans in 2012 along with the WH.
You have to accept that the Libertarians have opened the door for the Tea Party movement within the GOP nd that has caused about 60 seats to go fiscally conservative GOP.
Logic and common sense don't be strong characteristics of libertarians.
If I didnt have a sense of humor i wouldnt have brought it up. ;-)
Keep spinning. Every time you guys flip a seat, it means that "the whole country is going to start voting Republican." It's one seat in a special election, and like you said, this guy ran a year ago and lost. Everybody already knew his name.
It was about Weiner just like Jimmy Carter was about Nixon, and Bush (to some extent) was about Clinton, and Obama was about Bush. None of them had to actually run against the guy they beat.
I can't support the Republocrat offerings, those are not my best alternative.
What do you base that idea on? And would you characterize the majority of dem/gop muppets/voters as being 'thoughtful'?
Hey, Conservative, do you think we should come up with a juvenile name for libertarians?
This issue does not have national impact but in a couple of battleground states like Florida or Penn. this could be make or break for Obama.
but will never understand how any Libertarian can sit around and watch what Obama is doing to the economy and the govt. Survey the situation and if you don't have a chance, the last thing I would do is vote for a third party and allow Obama another four years. That doesn't make any sense.
there is much I like about Libertarians but will never understand how any Libertarian can sit around and watch what Obama is doing to the economy and the govt. Survey the situation and if you don't have a chance, the last thing I would do is vote for a third party and allow Obama another four years. That doesn't make any sense.
Keep spinning. Every time you guys flip a seat, it means that "the whole country is going to start voting Republican." It's one seat in a special election, and like you said, this guy ran a year ago and lost. Everybody already knew his name.
It was about Weiner just like Jimmy Carter was about Nixon, and Bush (to some extent) was about Clinton, and Obama was about Bush. None of them had to actually run against the guy they beat.
Koch, a Democratic Jew, hoped his support would send a message to the White House that Jewish Americans were dissatisfied with Obama's policies on Israel -- namely the president's position that a future Mideast peace solution requires Israel to return to its pre-1967 borders, with land swaps.
"I like President Obama ... I helped get him elected," Koch said at Turner's election night party. "But he threw Israel under the bus."
His remarks were met by cheers from the crowd, including one man who shouted, "He's a sell-out!"
Koch's nod pivoted the race into a relentless competition over who was a stronger supporter of Israel: Turner, a conservative Republican, or Weprin, an orthodox Jew.
Minutes after the election, the Republican Jewish Coalition released a statement in support of Turner.
"Jewish voters are coming to see that Republicans offer real solutions to our economic crisis, are resolute friends of Israel, and represent a way forward to a better future," said executive director Matt Brooks.
So I can affect the system then, eh? Good. Now appease me or continue to lose.
It's very simple. Because if not Obama, then some Republican who will act similarly enough to not make that much of a difference anyway. If your stuck with broken, there's no reason to go about supporting it. You think it's logical for use to back the Republicans instead of trying to get our own platform recognized. But the Republicans are part of the same problem the Democrats are. Why would you assume we'd support the lesser of two evils when we do not wish to see the evil at all?
I posted the numeric facts and when you don't have a mathematical chance of winning why would you allow someone like Obama to win election?
I said in a much earlier posting that votes have consequences.
Many of us left the GOP not because of Barrack Obama but because of the wreckless and irresponsible legislation of Bush and republicans. Obama was still a crack smokin state rep when I became a libertarian. Until one party demonstrates in action that they are invested in the strength of our nation and not all about gettin reelected, I'm done with them. If more took that position it would force change.
It's very simple. Because if not Obama, then some Republican who will act similarly enough to not make that much of a difference anyway. If your stuck with broken, there's no reason to go about supporting it. You think it's logical for us to back the Republicans instead of trying to get our own platform recognized. But the Republicans are part of the same problem the Democrats are. Why would you assume we'd support the lesser of two evils when we do not wish to see the evil at all?
We have ready addressed this. Because a choice between retard A and retard B still leaves you with a retard. Id rather see a gop house and senate and a president Obama than a financially corrupt GOP house, senate, and white house.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?