I think you should ask this guy...
When did McConnell say he wanted to make Obama a ‘one-term president’? - The Washington PostMcConnell: “If President Obama does a Clintonian backflip, if he’s willing to meet us halfway on some of the biggest issues, it’s not inappropriate for us to do business with him… I don’t want the president to fail; I want him to change.”
You DIDN’T just do that did you? Posting some edited version of McConnell’s statement is so juvenile and beneath a ‘top shelf’ poster. Note the balance of the interview that contained the portion you posted:
When did McConnell say he wanted to make Obama a ‘one-term president’? - The Washington Post
Doesn’t it hack you off when others post such unmitigated misrepresentative crap from ‘our’ side?
Compared to the clown show being run by Mavericky Maverick McMaverickson and his sidekick Grifter-To-Nowhere, even factoring Joe “Suaveness of a ‘70s Porn Star” Biden? Undoubtably.Yes, he showed “poise”.
Well apparently not “light skinned enough” for a sizable chunk of the country lost its mind when the nigger got into the Whitehouse. A smattering of such from the second, lesser wave.And he was light skinned. Harry Reid ‘Negro' Comment: Reid Apologizes For 'No Negro Dialect' Comment
Yeah, and if Romney was a ‘spic’ he’d be in the Whitehouse now. :roll:Geraldine Ferraro had it right. He had no other qualifications. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/12/us/politics/12campaign.html?_r=0
Besides myself, I know of numerous other conservatives that are abandoning the GOP because they have no interest in being associated with the idiots demanding that their presidential candidate show skepticism towards evolution.
Compared to the clown show being run by Mavericky Maverick McMaverickson and his sidekick Grifter-To-Nowhere, even factoring Joe “Suaveness of a ‘70s Porn Star” Biden? Undoubtably.
Well apparently not “light skinned enough” for a sizable chunk of the country lost its mind when the nigger got into the Whitehouse. A smattering of such from the second, lesser wave.
Yeah, and if Romney was a ‘spic’ he’d be in the Whitehouse now. :roll:
Although bitterness about the short-shrift that has been given to women in politics, and her personally, can eat into you like that. *sigh*
P.S. Time has shown her decidedly wrong.
It was not even close to his only strength, nor his only accomplishment. Further, wrapped up in and underlying the poise was not only a demonstration of knowledge of a whole lot of relevant subjects but a demonstrated interest in learning more.If “poise" has become the standard of electing a President then the bar has been set so low that anyone, no matter their history or experience, can become President.
Indeed. Reid ham-handedly trying to allay the white folks that it was a ‘non-threatening negro’ (because sadly that does very much matter, even still), and Team Hillary playing hardball gutter politics. ((Why did you leave out Jesse Jackson talking about how he was going to pluck Obama’s cherry’s? )) Welcome to the USA, a place that has a whole lot of growing up to do.Yes, these were the Democrats who were talking of his skin color,
Say what now?and that would include Barrack Obama.
Well I guess Romney had the crafty sense to keep it till he thought nobody that would tell was listening. :roll:This is how typical Leftists talk. Have you no shame?
I've always felt that the Democrats' biggest weakness is that they tend to be pansies. They aren't as passionate as they could be and therefore, they've missed a lot of opportunities.It's a shame that Democrats aren't passionate enough to have factions like this. But I suppose it's also testament to how polarized and extremist the individual stances within the Republican Party tend to be, like the "all taxes are theft" crowd, or the hyper religious crowd. Neither is particularly willing to compromise and get along with anyone. In contrast, Democrats seem to be much more able to compromise with each other. The progressive civil rights crowd, the environmentalist crowd, the pro social safety nets crowd... they manage to work together a lot better than different groups of Republicans do.
I think the right wing has too many positions that it's too stubborn about. But perhaps the left could stand to yell a little louder (or at least yell at all) about a few issues, to keep the party from complacency. I appreciate that this cohesion makes the left win more elections, but it also makes it drag in the mud a bit more.
<insert Will Rogers’ most famous/infamous quote about the Democratic party>It's a shame that Democrats aren't passionate enough to have factions like this.
It was not even close to his only strength, nor his only accomplishment. Further, wrapped up in and underlying the poise was not only a demonstration of knowledge of a whole lot of relevant subjects but a demonstrated interest in learning more.
In short, a competent technocrat (Ferraro’s crabby whining notwithstanding). Being big on meritocracy and not having a f’ing goober making the calls, that heavily appealed to me.
Indeed. Reid ham-handedly trying to allay the white folks that it was a ‘non-threatening negro’ (because sadly that does very much matter, even still), and Team Hillary playing hardball gutter politics. ((Why did you leave out Jesse Jackson talking about how he was going to pluck Obama’s cherry’s? )) Welcome to the USA, a place that has a whole lot of growing up to do.
Well I guess Romney had the crafty sense to keep it till he thought nobody that would tell was listening. :roll:
But yeah, I feel pretty damn comfortable saying that in a tone of sarcasm. I shutter to think how many people, even on this forum, hold that belief true in their heart of hearts.There is absolutely NO SHAME to be had in calling that BS out. None. Pretty damn pathetic of you to think there is.
There isn’t an eye roll big enough for this line of yours, or the rest of your post. You ignored the quotation marks?Ah, yes, it was all said in a tone of sarcasm. Isn't it always? I certainly don't mind calling your racist BS out, nor any other leftist racism that has always been a constant in their history.
And yet they'll vote for the conservative president under the guise as a Libertarian. Conservatives leaving the GOP means nothing really.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?