• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Report: Trump Revealed Israeli Commando and Mossad Operation in Syria to Russians

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,354
Reaction score
82,729
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Report: Trump Revealed Israeli Commando and Mossad Operation in Syria to Russians



Whether an Israeli or a Jordanian source, established intelligence protocol requires obtaining the permission of the source agency/government before sharing classified intel with third [foreign] parties.
 
But remember, there’s absolutely no reason to be concerned about possible ties between Trump and Russia. It was totally worth risking the lives of Israeli Commandos for... something.
 

I can actually remember discussing this not this morning, when someone posted it. No. I can remember way back when, when it happened. Silly bluper of a President with no experience in foreign policy and and the fineries of intelligence agency traditions. It was really quite interesting as it was just the thing to expect, if you put someone in a job without the required experience. Trump’s predecessor made similar mistakes for which the chickens are coming home to roost.
 
If this was Obama, the GOP Congress would be lining up investigations.

Fortunately, the Israelis now know not to share intel with Trump because he can't be trusted to not spill the beans.
 
Think this is the same information?

https://www.debatepolitics.com/us-partisan-politics-and-political-platforms/302434-treason-looks-like.html



As president, Trump has broad authority to declassify government secrets, making it unlikely that his disclosures broke the law.

White House officials involved in the meeting said Trump discussed only shared concerns about terrorism.

“The president and the foreign minister reviewed common threats from terrorist organizations to include threats to aviation,” said H.R. McMaster, the national security adviser, who participated in the meeting. “At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed, and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”
 
Last edited:

Trump does not have the authority to declassify intelligence that originated from allied sources. (I.e Israel.)

In the intel world, we add caveats as to who can receive these reports for a reason. We don’t add “//REL TO FVEY” or “//NOFORN” for fun. We do it beside it prevents Russia (and by extension, Iran) to know that we have the capability to know. Which compromises both capabilities and the lives of possible human sources.

But legally speaking, you are right. Trump can declassify intelligence as he wishes. But can you agree that declassifying Intel fathered from our alllies in the ME is a dangerous concept?
 


From the story:
“The president and the foreign minister reviewed common threats from terrorist organizations to include threats to aviation,” said H.R. McMaster, the national security adviser, who participated in the meeting. “At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed, and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”
 
Couldn’t even get to the article.

The link worked for me and obviously for others.

Click bait. Got a respected source? Ever hear of disinformation?

Respected by who? You? Haaretz (The Land) has been published since 1918 and is owned/distributed by the New York Times.

I still can't decide if the Russians here are laughing about Trumps intel blabbing or a Trump "grabbing *****" anecdote.

 

General McMaster can say whatever he likes, but considering he never worked as an intelligence officer I’ll take what he said with a grain of salt. Anyone with any time spent working with sensitive information would know better than to think sharing classified information with people without the classification or need to know is harmless.
 

I have to say these Trump era scandals a really bland compared to the scandals of the last administration

Like when Obama used the IRS to target innocent American citizens based on Political affiliation.

Or when he used his DOJ to target journalist and hack into their phone records

Or when he flew 400 million USD to the leading State sponsor of terror, or when he made billions of dollars in illegal payments to insurance companies

Of-course you people ignored every one of these scandals ( and so much more ) but that only legitimized them even more.

I guess we'll have to wait for the next Democrat administration to see a REAL Presidential scandal again
 
I have to say these Trump era scandals a really bland compared to the scandals of the last administration


Yeah those Obama scandals were real ***** grabbers by comparison. And you expect to be taken seriously?
 

I am sure you know more about it than a Lieutenant General in the United States Army and National Security Advisor to President Trump.
Again read what he said: “At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed, and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”
 
Yeah those Obama scandals were real ***** grabbers by comparison. And you expect to be taken seriously?

You dudes are retreading a story from 8 months ago. :lamo
 

Yes. I’m sure I can provide a more factual account on the importance of Operational security than a 3 Star who has everything to lose for speaking truthfully and correctly about his boss mishandling information.
 
Yes. I’m sure I can provide a more factual account on the importance of Operational security than a 3 Star who has everything to lose for speaking truthfully and correctly about his boss mishandling information.

I can too, but do you have enough access to the information to know if operational security was threatened?
 
Yes. I’m sure I can provide a more factual account on the importance of Operational security than a 3 Star who has everything to lose for speaking truthfully and correctly about his boss mishandling information.

No you can not. Just because you may have a clearance does not mean you have any more background in managing Operational security.
Many people have Top Secret code word need to know clearances.

Again read what he said: “At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed, and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”
 

It’s a very interesting story. I wonder why major media didn’t cover it. And I wonder if it’s true. Also wonder why the airports lifted their ban on electronics seeing that they had intelligence that said laptops were being turned into bombs that were undetectable. Doesn’t make sense that ban would ever be lifted. And it doesn’t wash that we wouldn’t have done the exact same thing. Care to hazard a guess?

Easy to get to.

My difficulties may be due to my using an IPad. Don’t know. But I couldn’t load the original link. I often have problems loading click bait sites. Just keeps giving me a message “There was a problem loading this web page. Reloading now.” Or some such.
 
Couldn’t even get to the article. Click bait. Got a respected source? Ever hear of disinformation?

I have to disagree. That source is not a click bait source at all. It is a respectable news source, just in Israel.
 

It was a gigantic, colossal story, but trump buried it with the next gigantic scandal as he's fond of doing.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…