- Joined
- May 19, 2009
- Messages
- 28,721
- Reaction score
- 6,738
- Location
- Redneck Riviera
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Not to be "insulting" but you expect that one word in one post is supposed to clarify your argument when everything you said afterward muddled you equivocation?
note you give no indication of what makes someone a "crazy" protesters leading the implication to be squarely that those calling him socialist/fascist/communist is what makes a crazy protester.
Its not other peoples fault if you are very poor at articulating what you actually mean.
Because crazy is a judgment call.
What, do you expect an essay on the definition of the word crazy?
Not to be "insulting" but you expect that one word in one post is supposed to clarify your argument when everything you said afterward muddled your equivocation?
End of discussion.
Because crazy is a judgment call.
What, do you expect an essay on the definition of the word crazy?
Did you not understand my earlier post?
You are not worth the time, nor te effort.
I do not trade words with people whose very first post is an insult.
End of discussion.
We expect that if you make a claim, you will substantiate it with evidence. This ain't rocket science.
I find it totally ridiculous I am being asked for "proof" for what is essentially a judgement call.
Do you think that calling Obama a communist makes somebody 'crazy'? I'd like to know the qualifications one would need for you to call them crazy.
Yet you keep coming back for more ... :roll:
Ridiculous.
This is not about a scientific claim.
It is about a judgement call.
No proof needed, o proof required.
Now, if I would have said there are x many people making x amount of money in x state, then yes I understand the need for proof.
But for this?
Hogwash.
Yet you keep coming back for more ... :roll:
We expect that if you post a statement generalizing an entire group of humans that you will be able to present statistically valid research that will substantiate that claim. And if you can't present it, the odds are pretty damn good that your initial post was logically flawed beyond repair.
Hope that helps.
I doubt he's finished with you.
End of discussion with jallman.
Well, watching the DP cabal dog pile on someone is enough for me to say goodbye to another thread that has nowhere else to go but the sewer.
The Limit; your ideas and political views are not shared by me, but that stated, there is a tactic here on DP where favored one's dog pile on a member until the thread is dragged into the sewer or you have violated a forum rule and get infracted or thread banned.
The best way to deal with it is to ignore the ones baiting and trolling and stick to the topic at hand. Don't say I didn't warn you.
Now, before the thread descends further into ignorance, I bid it adieu.
:2wave:
I am playing with people who just yesterday were classlessly dancing on the grave of individual.
I did not generalize an "entire group of humans." Another false attribution.
But do not expect any of us to keep quiet and not call bull**** on it.
Crazy...I do not know. It depends on the person.
However, calling Obama a communist is an uninformed opinion.
Because he is not a "communist" no matter how hard someone wishes it to be so.
Is this a tradition on this board...to repeatedly and falsely attribute words to a poster who has never actually said the things he or she is being accussed of?
Crazy...I do not know. It depends on the person.
However, calling Obama a communist is an uninformed opinion.
Because he is not a "communist" no matter how hard someone wishes it to be so.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?