• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Ready To Run

I could get behind McCain. Sometimes I think the whole republican party gets a bad rap because of the yahoo's representing them now. I think they have learned their lesson.

Last election, it was "Anybody but Bush." Next election, I think it will be "Anybody but Keg-Leg Hillary."

But if she DOES get elected....:rofl at least I can look forward to at least four more years of president bashing. :mrgreen:
 
Gill said:
Sure, let's play the poll game....

Sure thing, so you believe the polls about Bush then right? That the majority of American think he is not doing a good job?

The proof will be later on in the primaries. Until then conservatives are the majority that want Hilary to run.
 
TheNextEra said:
Sure thing, so you believe the polls about Bush then right? That the majority of American think he is not doing a good job?

The proof will be later on in the primaries. Until then conservatives are the majority that want Hilary to run.
Yes, I believe the polls on Bush's popularity are probably correct. They are slowly creeping into the mid 40's now.

So you completely dismiss all the polls of Dems that make Hillary the top choice? The only Dems I've seen that don't like her are the far left moonbat types like DUmmies and KOSkids.
 

I just go by your left wing whacko media that you like to quote all the time that says she is leading all dems in the polls for the nomination........Your argument is with them.....
 

I expect a lot of Liberals will vote for McCain too...What if your candidate was other liberals like Gore and Kerry?
 

Nope, we will just be called right wing extremists. While Clinton was in office, that is what I was called. Now that Bush is in office, I am called a left wing extremist. If Hillary wins, I will be called a right wing extremist again. One of these days, I am hoping that the dittoheads of both parties will try something original, you know, like debating. :rofl
 
Navy Pride said:
I just go by your left wing whacko media that you like to quote all the time that says she is leading all dems in the polls for the nomination........Your argument is with them.....

And just what left wing whacko media do I quote? Please give me some example of some that I have quoted.
 
TheNextEra said:
Maybe you are secret Hillary Fans. Has to be. :lol:
:lol: I think it has something to do with the extreme obsession with and hatred of her husband, who has been referred to as "my other son" by daddy Bush.
 
What I'd love to see is for Guiliani to run against Hillary for her seat in the Senate. Hand her @$$ and send her back to Arkansas, Rudy!!! Think about the message that would send to the voting public. If another of the Ds big guns goes down to an incumbent, the R's would have a huge public relations issue to build on. Unfortunately, Rudy's got his eyes on a bigger prize.
 
Navy Pride said:
I agree with the ambitious part but but I have never seen a woman let a man **** on her like she has let Bill **** on her......

I am not the first to insinuate she is AC/DC.........Yhat would explain a lot......
Not a chance, NP. She's a liberal and liberals love homosexuals. If she was AC/DC, the best thing she could do is out herself and guarantee herself the homosexual guilt vote.
 
TheNextEra said:
So you're proof is a poll?

Well then, since you consider polls absolute proof, Bush is doing a s.hitty job then by the majority of American people.

Still want to play the poll game?
I'm one of the biggest critics of the accuracy of polls that you'll ever find, but when you see numbers this big, it's a pretty solid indicator of things.
 
That's what you get when you're one of those pot-smokin', small gov't, low taxes, leave me the $%*# alone Libertarians. :mrgreen:
 
faithful_servant said:
I'm one of the biggest critics of the accuracy of polls that you'll ever find, but when you see numbers this big, it's a pretty solid indicator of things.

Not a solid indicator when you only show up a few choices?

For example, I ask conservatives, Who do you hate most? Cheney, Bush, or Rice?

Then I show that more people hate Bush so that means that the majority of conservatives hate Bush. Sorry, but that is misleading as well as the choices given in the poll for dems.
 

Dan, just because she's running, doen't mean she'll get the nomination. Dem's have sensed that Hillary is running for quite some time, and of course, she is free to do so.

I looked in my crystal ball today and saw that Mark Warner will end up with the Dem nomination.

Lieberman might just be the GOP nominee in 08. :2wave:
 
TheNextEra said:
And just what left wing whacko media do I quote? Please give me some example of some that I have quoted.

I don't know that you have quoted any but judging by your posts it can be the only media you listen to or read......
 
faithful_servant said:
Not a chance, NP. She's a liberal and liberals love homosexuals. If she was AC/DC, the best thing she could do is out herself and guarantee herself the homosexual guilt vote.

If she came out that would turn off a lot of moderate voters...Not to sure the gay vote can offset them.........
 

Playing the fear card usually produces a little spike for the GOP. I don't expect it too last though...until the next fear card is played.
 

I am glad you put a smiley there because Warner has no chance to win the nomination.....To much a moderate for the left wing whacko base of the democratic party that votes in the primaries.........Depending on who wins for the Republicans I might even vote for him......
 
hipsterdufus said:
Playing the fear card usually produces a little spike for the GOP. I don't expect it too last though...until the next fear card is played.
Yep, Rove pulls a few terrorists out of Gitmo and has them plot to blow up a plane every few months to keep the poll numbers high. :roll:

Of course, it could also be that a thwarted terror attacks remind the voters of the programs Republicans have put in place to make us safer. They also remember the Dems kicking and screaming at every new terrorism program. A Republican government makes voters feel safer... always has, always will.
 
hipsterdufus said:
Playing the fear card usually produces a little spike for the GOP. I don't expect it too last though...until the next fear card is played.

So you call foiling that terrorist attack playing the fear card?
 
It boggles my mind when a terrorist attack is thwarted and when it's reported people make comments such as 'Yup, must be an election year.'

What the ****?
 
Kinda like when Kucinich got the nomination.:doh
 
Doremus Jessup said:
Kinda like when Kucinich got the nomination.:doh

He wasn't as far to the left as Kerry was........Kerry is the biggest liberal in the U.S. Senate even to the left of "Fats" Kennedy as cited by a non partisan organization prior to the 2004 elections............He votes 96% of the time liberal.....

Kucinich is a moderate comapred to him....

Try again........
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kucinich


Sorry that your memory is failing, it must be a biatch.:lol:
 
Navy Pride said:
I don't know that you have quoted any but judging by your posts it can be the only media you listen to or read......

So in other words your accusation that I post from whacko media sources is a lie and you prove how dishonest you really are for throwing around such a partisan comment as that and this one here. Thanks for showing how a conservative debates.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…