- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Messages
- 47,360
- Reaction score
- 26,059
- Location
- Springfield MO
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Libertarianism is supposdly a way to utopia for all of us, but all the Libertarians that I have come across are "way out there" and are basically nothing more than an extremist form of Republicans. Like this:
Rand Paul's 5 most controversial beliefs
Kentucky Tea Party candidate Rand Paul has been criticized for his take on the Civil Rights Act. But that's not the only provocative position he's takentheweek.com
Libertarianism is supposdly a way to utopia for all of us, but all the Libertarians that I have come across are "way out there" and are basically nothing more than an extremist form of Republicans. Like this:
Rand Paul's 5 most controversial beliefs
Kentucky Tea Party candidate Rand Paul has been criticized for his take on the Civil Rights Act. But that's not the only provocative position he's takentheweek.com
Judging from the values of the Libertarians on this board, I'd rather not cede any powers to them.
Rand Paul is a Republocrat, his dad was far more libertarian than he is.Libertarianism is supposdly a way to utopia for all of us, but all the Libertarians that I have come across are "way out there" and are basically nothing more than an extremist form of Republicans. Like this:
Rand Paul's 5 most controversial beliefs
Kentucky Tea Party candidate Rand Paul has been criticized for his take on the Civil Rights Act. But that's not the only provocative position he's takentheweek.com
You spam this exact reply often. No need to continue, we get it. If you have original content, then by all means, but if you're just going to spam regurgitated posts, it is not necessary.Hell, here's the Libertarian Party's tax policy:
When you pay taxes, do you do so voluntarily? Or do you do so because you are forced to do so? If you don’t pay your taxes, what will happen? Will you be fined further? Harassed by the IRS or other government entities? Jailed? The Libertarian Party is fundamentally opposed to the use of force to coerce people into doing anything. We think it is inherently wrong and should have no role in a civilized society. Thus we think that government forcing people to pay taxes is inherently wrong.
Libertarians advocate for voluntary exchange, where people are free to make their own choices about what to do with their lives, their time, their bodies, their livelihood, and their dollars. If Americans want to give money to the government for one reason or another, they should be free to do so. If Americans prefer to spend their money on other things, then they should be free to do that also.
Taxes - Libertarian Party
Dear Libertarian, When you look at your tax bill, do you feel like a slave to the IRS? Republicans like to talk a good game about tax reform and fiscal responsibility but they are not committed to it. They have control of the House, Senate, and Presidency and if they wanted bold reform, they...www.lp.org
How clueless does a person have to be to think America could function as a country united under a federal government if the only way government can get money is from Americans who "want to give money to the government for one reason or another"? Very little would give and there would be no way to plan for the future.
Aside.You'll note this goes farther than the usual suggestion of these folks, which is that sales taxes and the like would be enough. (They usually frame it as "voluntary" taxation, but that's moronic. A voluntary sales tax would be: cashier rings you up, you are prompted to say whether or not you would like to pay the tax. Instead, it's just as involuntary as income tax: sure, the action that triggers the tax is voluntary - working (income tax) or buying (sales tax))
At any rate, just think about what passing that tax platform would mean. More or less immediately, the federal government would become insolvent and collapse. Nobody is going to lend to a country that has just done away with its ability to raise revenue. Do they expect all federal workers to just sort of volunteer or something? Manufacturers to donate needed supplies? Lunacy.
The best thing one can say about a Libertarian candidate is that they probably wouldn't get their way since congress would never do something that catastrophically stupid, even though it may be congress.
The father of US Libertarians is Ron Paul who was a lifelong politician who used the US military to pay for his medical degree. Yea it is nonsenseYou don't understand Libertarianism if you think that it's supposed to be Utopia. The concept of Utopia is more of a liberal bent, trying to construct a perfect society but there is no such thing so continual measures pile on top of each other until you have an oppressive regime.
Libertarianism understands there is no Utopia but there is no need to micro-manage every aspect of people's lives. It prefers to error on the site of freedom and liberty so people have a choice to do what they want with their lives.
Would you rather have an oppressive system that's imperfect or an imperfect system that is free?
You don't understand Libertarianism if you think that it's supposed to be Utopia. The concept of Utopia is more of a liberal bent, trying to construct a perfect society but there is no such thing so continual measures pile on top of each other until you have an oppressive regime.
Libertarianism understands there is no Utopia but there is no need to micro-manage every aspect of people's lives. It prefers to error on the site of freedom and liberty so people have a choice to do what they want with their lives.
Would you rather have an oppressive system that's imperfect or an imperfect system that is free?
You don't understand Libertarianism if you think that it's supposed to be Utopia. The concept of Utopia is more of a liberal bent, trying to construct a perfect society but there is no such thing so continual measures pile on top of each other until you have an oppressive regime.
Libertarianism understands there is no Utopia but there is no need to micro-manage every aspect of people's lives. It prefers to error on the site of freedom and liberty so people have a choice to do what they want with their lives.
Would you rather have an oppressive system that's imperfect or an imperfect system that is free?
How clueless does a person have to be to think America could function as a country united under a federal government if the only way government can get money is from Americans who "want to give money to the government for one reason or another"? Very little would give and there would be no way to plan for the future.
You don't understand Libertarianism if you think that it's supposed to be Utopia. The concept of Utopia is more of a liberal bent, trying to construct a perfect society but there is no such thing so continual measures pile on top of each other until you have an oppressive regime.
Libertarianism understands there is no Utopia but there is no need to micro-manage every aspect of people's lives. It prefers to error on the site of freedom and liberty so people have a choice to do what they want with their lives.
Would you rather have an oppressive system that's imperfect or an imperfect system that is free?
You spam this exact reply often. No need to continue, we get it. If you have original content, then by all means, but if you're just going to spam regurgitated posts, it is not necessary.
More to the point, we TRIED that, with the articles of confederation. It didn't work, so we adopted the current constitution.
You don't understand Libertarianism if you think that it's supposed to be Utopia. The concept of Utopia is more of a liberal bent, trying to construct a perfect society but there is no such thing so continual measures pile on top of each other until you have an oppressive regime.
Libertarianism understands there is no Utopia but there is no need to micro-manage every aspect of people's lives. It prefers to error on the site of freedom and liberty so people have a choice to do what they want with their lives.
Would you rather have an oppressive system that's imperfect or an imperfect system that is free?
What could possibly be the problem of funding the federal government with bake sales and donations?Hell, here's the Libertarian Party's tax policy:
When you pay taxes, do you do so voluntarily? Or do you do so because you are forced to do so? If you don’t pay your taxes, what will happen? Will you be fined further? Harassed by the IRS or other government entities? Jailed? The Libertarian Party is fundamentally opposed to the use of force to coerce people into doing anything. We think it is inherently wrong and should have no role in a civilized society. Thus we think that government forcing people to pay taxes is inherently wrong.
Libertarians advocate for voluntary exchange, where people are free to make their own choices about what to do with their lives, their time, their bodies, their livelihood, and their dollars. If Americans want to give money to the government for one reason or another, they should be free to do so. If Americans prefer to spend their money on other things, then they should be free to do that also.
Taxes - Libertarian Party
Dear Libertarian, When you look at your tax bill, do you feel like a slave to the IRS? Republicans like to talk a good game about tax reform and fiscal responsibility but they are not committed to it. They have control of the House, Senate, and Presidency and if they wanted bold reform, they...www.lp.org
How clueless does a person have to be to think America could function as a country united under a federal government if the only way government can get money is from Americans who "want to give money to the government for one reason or another"? Very little would give and there would be no way to plan for the future.
Aside.You'll note this goes farther than the usual suggestion of these folks, which is that sales taxes and the like would be enough. (They usually frame it as "voluntary" taxation, but that's moronic. A voluntary sales tax would be: cashier rings you up, you are prompted to say whether or not you would like to pay the tax. Instead, it's just as involuntary as income tax: sure, the action that triggers the tax is voluntary - working (income tax) or buying (sales tax))
At any rate, just think about what passing that tax platform would mean. More or less immediately, the federal government would become insolvent and collapse. Nobody is going to lend to a country that has just done away with its ability to raise revenue. Do they expect all federal workers to just sort of volunteer or something? Manufacturers to donate needed supplies? Lunacy.
The best thing one can say about a Libertarian candidate is that they probably wouldn't get their way since congress would never do something that catastrophically stupid, even though it may be congress.
What could possibly be the problem of funding the federal government with bake sales and donations?
The field of macroeconomics seems to be an idea that they have never heard of.
I go for that because it's the lowest-hanging fruit. But you see the same thing throughout the platform. It strikes me as naive as communism or anarchy.
There's no way we could function as a nation if it were all implemented. One thing after another, the platform says "we don't believe government should do that. People should be free to [blah blah blah]". Both anarchism and communism postulate a government-free state (one of the reasons no state that has called itself "communist" actually is - they're all totalitarian governments with highly socialist economies). Humans in a government-free state very quickly revert back to government. Namely, when a local warlord decides to step into a power vacuum. Bingo, now you've got a government.
The Libertarian Party platform is not all that far off. There is very little they want government to do, and they don't want to give it the means to do it. It chaps my ass because we've already seen what happens with a threadbare federal government. Somolia, Ethiopia, etc., all sorts of war-torn regions. There's always going to be someone or some group who is willing to take power. Maybe here it'd be corporations with private armies, not local warlords, but we sure as hell wouldn't all just get along under rainbows farted out by the flying unicorns.
It's true as to most single-issues, too. Take regulation of businesses, both as to labor and environment. Now look at the industrial revolution. That's what we got. Businesses polluting where they want, making no effort to protect workers, child labor for 12h+ a day, and the sausage you picked up from the butcher being 1/5th human, 1/5th rat, 1/10th rat shit, and the rest....pork of dubious quality.
"The free market will fix it because people won't buy it", they say. No it won't, and no it didn't. Set up a race to the bottom and everyone races to the bottom. Yadda yadda. As I've been reminded, I have said it all before. But I'll say it all again.
I sometimes think these folks think they are in the early eighteen hundreds where they can just go out and claim land and keep everyone away from their little bit of heaven. Libertarians are republicans just more out there than the average R.Libertarianism is supposdly a way to utopia for all of us, but all the Libertarians that I have come across are "way out there" and are basically nothing more than an extremist form of Republicans. Like this:
Rand Paul's 5 most controversial beliefs
Kentucky Tea Party candidate Rand Paul has been criticized for his take on the Civil Rights Act. But that's not the only provocative position he's takentheweek.com
You have got to be kidding me.
Do you have any idea how many times you have posted the exact same points about what you call "Republocrats"? Do an advanced search. Posts by Ikari containing "Republocrats." Ten pages of results, generally making the same drumbeat: they're corrupt, they're beholden to corporations, they've got a stranglehold on the system.
I haven't made the point about the loony tax policy anywhere near that many times.
Secondly, it's not wrong for either of us to do this. It's expected. If the same threads and points keep being made by the same people, the same general replies are going to fit. If a hundred people ask why 2+2=4, they're all going to get the same answer. Like all the threads about non-existent voter fraud in the election. You, me, and so many others, had exactly the same kind of laugh-it-off reply in each one.
Maybe it bothers you because you say you voted Libertarian, but I can't help that. If someone is wondering why the Libertarian Party isn't getting traction, the answer is going to be the same: because of their policies. I'm not much in the mood to come up with a new answer for why 2+2=4 every time. Occam would approve. Similarly, you don't go beyond your standard line against the Ds and Rs. Why bother when you feel it sufficient?
PS: and it's not a copy/paste. The rare occasion when I really do copy/paste a post, I note that I'm quoting myself from the last time I said it. The tax policy is the part that's copy/pasted because of course it is: it's their platform.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?