• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rahm Emanuel May Run For the Presidency in 2016.....

Johnson wasn't running in '08. I think he was endorsing Ron Paul, who I think is a crackpot. And, Libertarian dogma reminds me that America is not far from becoming like India: declining social services, poor infrastructure, and huge disparities in wealth.

Obama's history, from Harvard Law Review through his short stint in the Senate shows that he doesn't lean progressive. Contrary to what the media portrays, he is a solid Centrist. So much so, that the wingnut meme declaring him to be a socialist simply proves their ignorance.

Obama's voting record as Senator and his own words from his <ahem> "biography" scream very loudly that the opinion you just put forth is pure horse manure. Didn't read the book or look at his voting record, did you? Probably never listened very closely to any of his speeches either.
 
Obama's voting record as Senator and his own words from his <ahem> "biography" scream very loudly that the opinion you just put forth is pure horse manure. Didn't read the book or look at his voting record, did you? Probably never listened very closely to any of his speeches either.

Nope. I just watch how he governs, which is clearly from the Center. Just ask all those yahoos protesting the XL Pipeline.
 
So are you saying that with and thru his mentors that he does not correlate such with his political philosophy and teachings? Perhaps you should read his books.

Why would I read his books? They're probably just filled with propaganda and other BS.

What I read was how he pissed off Liberals at Harvard who expected him to hand sweet do-nothing positions to minorities, which he did not. Now, I watch how he cuts deals that toss his base under the bus in an effort to move things forward. This is something the GOP has not learned to do. Unlike the Republican Party which has basically become a hostage of the Far Right, the Dems have been moving away from the Far Left for decades.

In governing, Obama is to the Right of Bill Clinton. Which surprised me, I must add. I never expected him to move beyond the old guard, shoving Jessie Jackson and his crowd by the wayside. Hats off to him for that.
 
Why would I read his books? They're probably just filled with propaganda and other BS.

What I read was how he pissed off Liberals at Harvard who expected him to hand sweet do-nothing positions to minorities, which he did not. Now, I watch how he cuts deals that toss his base under the bus in an effort to move things forward. This is something the GOP has not learned to do. Unlike the Republican Party which has basically become a hostage of the Far Right, the Dems have been moving away from the Far Left for decades.

In governing, Obama is to the Right of Bill Clinton. Which surprised me, I must add. I never expected him to move beyond the old guard, shoving Jessie Jackson and his crowd by the wayside. Hats off to him for that.

Which changes nothing about Obama's political philosophy and that teaching from him mentors. He sure wasn't pissing often many at Colombia. When getting into classes for Foreign Diplomacy.

Seems he was voted in as the Harvard Editor, as well. Which was not based on any writing he did. Nor concerning any Tutorial for the Review. I know a couple of Army Jag Officers that were in Harvard at the same time Obama was. They can tell you all about his time in Harvard.

The other reason to read his books.....is so that you know first hand how he thinks. Despite any of propaganda.
 
Which changes nothing about Obama's political philosophy and that teaching from him mentors. He sure wasn't pissing often many at Colombia. When getting into classes for Foreign Diplomacy.

Seems he was voted in as the Harvard Editor, as well. Which was not based on any writing he did. Nor concerning any Tutorial for the Review. I know a couple of Army Jag Officers that were in Harvard at the same time Obama was. They can tell you all about his time in Harvard.

The other reason to read his books.....is so that you know first hand how he thinks. Despite any of propaganda.
I don't care how he thinks. I care only how he governs.

I sort of liked how W Bush thinks, if you can call it that, but he governed like a moron. That's what matters.
 
You'd rather have Hillary? McCain? Mittens? How about John Edwards?

Compared to the competition, Obama isn't half bad. Unless, of course, you have something personal against Black Democrats.

I'd rather have a dead wombat than Obama

and I couldn't care what color he is-he sucks. He is a tax hiking gun banning wannabe socialist dictator
 
I'd rather have a dead wombat than Obama

and I couldn't care what color he is-he sucks. He is a tax hiking gun banning wannabe socialist dictator
What tax did he hike and gun did he ban? And, while you're digging around for a clue, please explain exactly how he is a socialist and a dictator.


This should be good.
 
I don't care how he thinks. I care only how he governs.

I sort of liked how W Bush thinks, if you can call it that, but he governed like a moron. That's what matters.

Well at least he had the Experience to govern. Obama has none.....which is why 4 million people less. Didn't vote this time round from him. That's 4 million who had voted for him the very first time.....then walked away seeing the empty Suit for what it was.

Moreover you say Bush was a moron on how he governed. Then just how did he get 11 million more people to vote for him in his second term? Than what he had the first time round.
 
Well at least he had the Experience to govern. Obama has none.....which is why 4 million people less. Didn't vote this time round from him. That's 4 million who had voted for him the very first time.....then walked away seeing the empty Suit for what it was.

Moreover you say Bush was a moron on how he governed. Then just how did he get 11 million more people to vote for him in his second term? Than what he had the first time round.
:lol: Reaching for the "moral victories" I see.
 
:lol: Reaching for the "moral victories" I see.



You say Po-tate-O.....and I say Baked and Mashed.
evil6.gif
 


You say Po-tate-O.....and I say Baked and Mashed.
evil6.gif


Bush went from kinda-sorta loosing the first election to barely winning the second one. Obama smoked the competition in both elections.

You must have been a Buffalo Bills fan in the 90's.
 
Bush went from kinda-sorta loosing the first election to barely winning the second one. Obama smoked the competition in both elections.

You must have been a Buffalo Bills fan in the 90's.

Nah.....I already admitted Obama won his 2nd term with less votes than all other second term Presidents.

More like a Buffalo Wings fan.....Hot-N-Spicy! :2razz:
 
yeah this is the guy we need as president

4333930690_17d9735b1d.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom