This race was over before the first Iowan went into a caucus.
Current reporting is that Romney has won both Mississippi and Alabama by respectable margins. If that holds true, then this race is (un)officially done - Santorum will not be able to maintain the argument that he is a legitimate counter to Romney if he can't even win the Bible Belt.
Santorum (ugh) should at that point drop out of the race, or at least pour no more resources into attacking Romney, who will at that point be the GOP's nominee. Conservatives wishing to moan and b---h about having another squishy moderate/liberal as our Party's standard bearer (and I am one of them) are free to console ourselves with the fact that we had a chance to change that, and we appear to have elected not to do so.
Current reporting is that Romney has won both Mississippi and Alabama by respectable margins. If that holds true, then this race is (un)officially done - Santorum will not be able to maintain the argument that he is a legitimate counter to Romney if he can't even win the Bible Belt.
Santorum (ugh) should at that point drop out of the race, or at least pour no more resources into attacking Romney, who will at that point be the GOP's nominee. Conservatives wishing to moan and b---h about having another squishy moderate/liberal as our Party's standard bearer (and I am one of them) are free to console ourselves with the fact that we had a chance to change that, and we appear to have elected not to do so.
well just checked and nearly all claims romney was way ahead were based on less than 1% votes counted.no full results yet but whats been counted so far shows all three tided is mississipi and santorum ahead in alabama.
And that had more relevance than the claim in the OP< which was based on 0 % in. Lesson learned: when some one claims something is being reported but offers no source, it's bull****.
i absolutely hate obama,but ill probably vote for either him or third party,atleast with obama i know what hes done and will do,romney is a guessing game as to what hed morph into.
Obama is the worst possible choice if you understand how federal judges are appointed
a quick search on google shows he is right,but based on less than 1%,some of the reports showed romney with a 40% lead with than 30 votes counted.
ive seen it before in past elections especially in local news,people want to vote a winner,so if someone presents a winner with almost no votes counted,those still voting with the im gonna change my football team every year cuz i cant back a loser will switch votes so they can brag about backing a winner,definately not enough of them to throw any normal election but in a tight race you know the media is going to throw their influence nto the race.
Current reporting is that Romney has won both Mississippi and Alabama by respectable margins.
but if its an obama vs romney its basically liberal vs liberal,the incumbent liberal atleast i know what he stands for and every corrupt thing hes done,romney would be a guessing game,no one can tell with that guy,obama served some flip flops but romney and kerry are co owners of the house of flip flops!
if you cant stick to your own grounds and say what people want you to say,ill stick with failure,because that failure is proven but romney is unproven,we could remove failure for extreme failure.
No it was not. Several candidates had a chance to win.
Does any one else find it amusing that the more certain people try and push the republican party to the right, the more republican voters pick moderates?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?