• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Q1 GDP revised down to -0.5% in third estimate; prices revised up

Airyaman

New Druid
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 4, 2018
Messages
46,299
Reaction score
59,360
Location
AL
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Yowie. Seems Q1 was worse in many ways than originally estimated.


1750945244445.webp

1750945287232.webp

GuXtrKSXgAEH2gU


GuXt2A8WgAAkwS0




The Golden Age is not looking all that golden.
 
Looking pretty golden from where I sit. How do we know this "revised" assesment is accurate? Apparently it's changing daily nad the left likes to lie so I'm skeptical od anything that comes from some sources.
 
Ask yourself what actions have the Trump administration taken that will actually promote short term growth? All the actions I can think off come with the promise of future (not short term) wonders that Trump claims will be awesome, and most serious economists have extreme doubts about. This is why Trump is so desperate to see the Fed drop interest rates. The actions that Trump is taking are mostly economically destructive, so he needs the Fed to drop interest rates to try and stimulate more consumer borrowing and spending (as if we really need more consumer borrowing). Trump isn't worried about inflation because that is a future problem that he will invent excuses for once it occurs. Fortunately for us all, that isn't the congressional mandate that the Fed operates under and must comply with.
 
Read an interesting article the other day, I believe it was Wall Street Journal but can't swear to it. The author's expectation is that 2Q GDP will come in with a healthy number because exports in the 2Q were higher than imports. Normally that would be a good thing but imports are way down because of tariffs not because of a strong export market. He said it actually a sign of a weakening economy not a strong economy. However, you can be sure if it's a good number Trumpers will insist it's a sign of a booming economy even as spending shrinks and unemployment starts to grow.
 
Looking pretty golden from where I sit.
Personal anecdotes are not a compelling debate response.
How do we know this "revised" assesment is accurate? Apparently it's changing daily nad the left likes to lie so I'm skeptical od anything that comes from some sources.
Daddy's government reported the numbers.

An official website of the United States government


 
What happened in the past is of lesser importance. These numbers were perturb by weird things happening with import/exports. These numbers will stabilize and correct in the next few quarters which will provide us better visibility of what's really going on. My thinking is these number along with low inflation will clearly drive the Fed to finally lower their rates.
 
Republican voters could care less. As long as a Democrat is not in the WH, the country could self immolate…..
 
It’s a new age of American prosperity. Promises made. Promises kept.
 
Looking pretty golden from where I sit.
Which is where?

Some areas are doing better than others. Things have slowed here but not stopped. I guess that's better than other places.

How do we know this "revised" assesment is accurate? Apparently it's changing daily nad the left likes to lie so I'm skeptical od anything that comes from some sources.
Everybody's lying. It's a worldwide conspiracy against Trump.
 
Q1 GDP revised down to -0.5% in third estimate; prices revised up
You said Biden didn't leave Trump a recession.

Yowie. Seems Q1 was worse in many ways than originally estimated.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/4462672-q1-gdp-revised-down-to--05-in-third-estimate-prices-revised-up

View attachment 67576791

View attachment 67576792

GuXtrKSXgAEH2gU


GuXt2A8WgAAkwS0


The Golden Age is not looking all that golden.

It may not be a recession--2nd quarter isn't in yet--but Biden left a mess.
 
You said Biden didn't leave Trump a recession.


It may not be a recession--2nd quarter isn't in yet--but Biden left a mess.
Lol, your gaslighting isn't even worth the effort.
 
Do you know what gaslighting means?

In this context, it's a compliment.
Basically gaslighting is feeding false information on something to try to change one's perception of reality.

Biden didn't cause any of this bullshit, it's 100% on Trump.


1750954171479.webp
 
Close but not exactly.


Biden turned over an economy in distress.

Q1 is entirely on him. Trump has not had time to do anything yet.
Yeah, there's a reason you aren't backing your assertion with support from actual economists: because you're wrong.
 
Yeah, there's a reason you aren't backing your assertion with support from actual economists: because you're wrong.
The reason is that quarter two isn't over yet.

You are saying that Q1 is bad, and I agree.
 
The reason is that quarter two isn't over yet.

You are saying that Q1 is bad, and I agree.
But you blame Q1 on Biden, and very few economists agree. Almost all put the blame on Trump's chaotic policies.
 
But you blame Q1 on Biden, and very few economists agree. Almost all put the blame on Trump's chaotic policies.
Economists typically count the whole first year to the old administration.

I'm just claiming that Biden left a mess. All of your posts agree.
 
Economists typically count the whole first year to the old administration.

I'm just claiming that Biden left a mess. All of your posts agree.
TYPICALLY, what you say is true. Typically, however, new president's do not make drastic moves on the economic levers in the first weeks in office. Trump did. Most presidents move the levers gradually; Trump did not.

The cause of the economic slowdown is substantially tied to Trump capricious and drastic implementation of tariffs, then reversing course, then reversing again. This created uncertainty in American business which let to an immediate constriction of investment along with some furloughs. As a result, consumer confidence suddenly waned. This all led to precipitous drop in the stock market which caused $5 trillion dollars of wealth to disappear, essentially creating a reverse stimulus. There was also significant furloughs in government, which is 20% of GDP.


Biden did not leave an economic mess. He left an economy that economists at the British publication, The Economist, dubbed the "envy of the world".....


Perhaps you would like to tell us all what specific things Biden did in the last quarter of 2024 to screw up that up. Don't bother, we all know you are not capable of such.

You know that the only radical changes to the economy came from Trump in February and March. Trump just managed to immediately screw it up with his impulsive moves.

While is pretty typical for a new president to not have much of an impact on the economy for about the first six months of his term, Trump found a way to make an impact. Elections have consequences. This consequence is particularly bad.
 
Last edited:
Economists typically count the whole first year to the old administration.

I'm just claiming that Biden left a mess. All of your posts agree.
No they don't.
 
Back
Top Bottom