a. I don't see any positive things in supplying Iran with anything.
b. Whoever wrote this article needs to study a bit more about how Israel allegedly conducts air strikes on foreign land, and about the intention and the capabilities of IDF.
Because this "A possible Israeli attack on Iran is expected to start with a massive missile attack on Iran’s key air defense sites and military air bases before follow-up airstrikes at its fortified nuclear enrichment facilities. S-300VMs are well-suited to counter this threat, Kommersant said." is just idiotic.
Fallen.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1929 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaFurther provisions of the resolution included:[4]
Iran could not participate in any activities related to ballistic missiles.
A ban on all countries providing military vehicles, aircraft or warships and missiles or missile systems and related materiel to Iran;
Allegedly Israel carried out the attacks in Syria, but these strikes were carried out differently i.e using other means, techniques etc.Did not Israel bombed Syria? Did not Israel attacked Lebanon in 2007?
I don't get how it is relevant to Iran, S-300, or Israel's military capabilities?!?It seems to me that many terrorists Israel released in exchange for Israeli soldier. Although I could be wrong. I do not know the situation completely
Stupid RT...
Allegedly Israel carried out the attacks in Syria, but these strikes were carried out differently i.e using other means, techniques etc.
Blowing up Iranian, anti-aircraft systems, bases, using tons of ballistic missiles etc...as described in that article, means opening a full scale war against Iran.
At this time, and in the near future Israel does not see an option of opening a full confrontation with Iran (at least not without the involvement of US) as possible - so the scenario in the article is idiotic.
Lebanon 2007....Maybe you meant to say 2006?!?
I don't get how it is relevant to Iran, S-300, or Israel's military capabilities?!?
Fallen.
I don't get how it is relevant to Iran, S-300, or Israel's military capabilities?!?
*laughs* For intellectuals - of course Fox News and wikipedia.
I'm not conservative or republican. Perhaps the next time you are inclined to believe that piece of garbage called RT, you'll check with reality first.
Of course. And the reality - a chemical weapon Saddam Hussein? For example.
The reality is that Saddam was intentionally faking a WMD program to keep Iran at bay.
In CIA work idiots? It is alleged chemical weapons were the cause of the attack on Iraq. U.S. Secretary of Defense turned flask white powder in front of his nose at a meeting of the United Nations. And the U.S. media were shouting about a chemical weapons. But I'll be no surprised . The U.S. policy is based on lies. Although funny as "patriots" called stupid - RT. Bravo!
I was staying at a Colorado Springs hotel for a few days last January. I was flipping through the channels one evening and noticed I was watching a network I had never heard of before: Russia Today.
Curiosity got the best of me so I watched for a little while. It was absolutely the most ridiculous, dishonest, and utterly transparent propagandist programming I have ever seen in my life. They were actually exploring the events of 9-11 through the perspective of a conspiracy theorist and presenting it as if it were some kind of consensus summary of the event.:shock:
I'm only commenting about the reliability, or lack there of, of the source.*laughs* But it was hard to stop watching. RT channel on YouTube watching more than a billion. By the way, what you see deception in this story? You do not believe that Putin will travel to Iran? Or you do not believe that there will be negotiations about arms?
Right - 2006.
I think the result of the invasion of Lebanon - reveals Israel's military capabilities. Or not?
The reality is that Saddam was intentionally faking a WMD program to keep Iran at bay.
And everyone including the Russians, Chinese and everyone else with a brain believed it. The deception was well conducted, and because it was so illogical it worked. No ever thought he was more afraid of Iran than the US.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?