• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Provision for selling public land in "Big Beautiful Bill" removed

Roadvirus

Heading North
Dungeon Master
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
51,879
Reaction score
44,189
Location
Tennessee, USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
From the horse's mouth (or ass. Whichever you think it came from)....


“Because of the strict constraints of the budget reconciliation process, I was unable to secure clear, enforceable safeguards to guarantee that these lands would be sold only to American families – not to China, not to Blackrock and not to any foreign interests,” Lee said in a post on the social platform X.

“For that reason, I’ve decided to withdraw the federal land sales provision from the bill,” he added.


 

One little bit of good news, anyway.
 
How magnanimous of you, Senator.
 
Bills go through lots of changes.
 
BLM controls a lot of desert land out West. I support Uncle selling it off and opening it to the public.
 
Rotflmao!
 
More likely, Trump wasn't making any money off of it so he didn't object to removing it.
 
What land does BLM control?
Plenty. Check it out


BLM 2025 Trail Closures: What They Mean for Off-Road Adventures​



 
LOLOLOL I thought you meant "Black Lives Matter". I was thinking "Wait, what weird conspiracy thing is this??" LOLOLOL
 
BLM controls a lot of desert land out West. I support Uncle selling it off and opening it to the public.
What? What? Selling it off removes it from the public. The public owns it now. You want to put it in the hands of wealthy private individuals.
 

I was sure something like this would happen.
 
Letting China buy huge patches of US land doesn’t seem like a fantastic idea.
 
Letting China buy huge patches of US land doesn’t seem like a fantastic idea.
I don't know that could happen in a lot of places in the US. I think the advertised concern was a quick reason for removing the land sale provision.
 
I don't know that could happen in a lot of places in the US. I think the advertised concern was a quick reason for removing the land sale provision.

I think there should be rules about who can buy US government owned land.
Privately owned land is theirs to sell to who they like but government does have a right to decide who can buy land they sell.

However unlikely it is China could end up being an advasary so it would seem unwise to let the Chinese state own large chunks of land.
I would say the same for the UK.
 


So you want that land sold so those trails would no longer be accessible to the public.

A Bill Gates might buy it all and prevent any access to it
 
Translation: "My amendment is illegal and was rejected, but I still want to do this horrible thing and I absolutely will do so as soon as possible."
 
Which of these closures are you in opposition to?
 

24 states have strict regulations on selling to foreign investors. Not all but a good patch work.
 
Many of these purchases over the past few years have been of farmland or ranchland near U.S. military bases.

Revelations from a groundbreaking exclusive CNN story published on July 23 about telecommunications equipment from China’s Huawei installed in rural America suggest that Chinese land purchases could pose a severe national security threat as well.

CNN chronicles the Chinese government’s more than decade-long effort to establish a massive electronic intelligence and jamming capability in the U.S. adjacent to military installations and in Washington, D.C. Such a system could deliver a crippling electronic Pearl Harbor against American nuclear weapons systems and strategic communications vital to deterring and defeating a military surprise attack.

The report details how China’s state-supported telecommunications giants, Huawei and ZTE, sold cell tower equipment and routers, often at a loss, to small, rural telecommunications providers in the heartland. Much of the made-in-China equipment was installed adjacent to the land-based leg of America’s nuclear triad — the 400 Minuteman III Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) — in Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, and Wyoming.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…