- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- Messages
- 26,359
- Reaction score
- 23,489
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Ah, the good old days….Remember when Bill Clinton had a conversation on a plane and how that was the most corrupt thing ever?
Prosecutors Drop Charges Against GOP Lawmaker
Federal prosecutors have officially dropped all charges against former GOP lawmaker Carolina Amesty after uncovering exculpatory evidence that cleared her of wrongdoing. Her attorney, Brad Bondi, Attorney General Pam Bondi’s brother, confirmed the investigation’s closure and praised the justice system for recognizing the facts. Amesty had previously been charged for misusing $122,000 in COVID relief loans.
A GQP thief gets away with stealing because her lawyer is Pam Bondi's brother.
This is extraordinarily inappropriate.
Brad Bondi needs to be disbarred.
More baseless reich-wing denial."Gets away with stealing" and "exculpatory evidence" don't exactly go together in the way you seem to think they do.
Even you can see how this looks bad right? Never mind"Gets away with stealing" and "exculpatory evidence" don't exactly go together in the way you seem to think they do.
I'm sure that you're sure of that. What I'm not sure of is WHY you're so sure of that.More baseless reich-wing denial.
This was nothing more than case-fixing by Bondi.
It does look bad. If a person is prosecuted for a "crime" in which there is "substantial evidence" that she didn't commit then yes, that's bad.Even you can see how this looks bad right? Never mind
Bondi is well known for taking bribes.I'm sure that you're sure of that. What I'm not sure of is WHY you're so sure of that.
The "why" is clear: TDS.I'm sure that you're sure of that. What I'm not sure of is WHY you're so sure of that.
She hadn't been proven anything. That would require a court room and a judge and jury. Her charges were dropped very suspiciously I might add. At the very least, her attorney should have recused because of his relationship to the AG.Imagine being so desperate that you complain that you can't convict your political enemies of crimes for which they've been proven innocent.
So liberal groups filed ridiculous complaints against Bondi and you call that "evidence".Bondi is well known for taking bribes.
Her brother tried a case in which she has subject matter authority.
This is absolutely inappropriate.
Pam Bondi accused of "serious misconduct" in Florida Bar complaint
The DOJ called the complaint "performative" and "vexatious."www.newsweek.com
The Trump Foundation-Pam Bondi scandal - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
In March 2016, CREW discovered that the Trump Foundation had broken the law by giving an illegal $25,000 contribution to a political group supporting Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi. This would set off an investigation which would lead to one of the biggest stories of the year. Here’s how it...www.citizensforethics.org
'More Corruption and Abuse' on the Way as Bondi Fires DOJ Ethics Chief | Common Dreams
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi fired Joseph Tirrell as director of the Departmental Ethics Office, further elevating concerns over her control of the Department of Justice.www.commondreams.org
Group Files Corruption Complaint with FBI Against Pam Bondi Over Trump Donation | Law & Crime
The Democratic Coalition against Trump has filed a complaint with the FBI's Public Corruption unit against Floriday Attorney General Pam Bondi.lawandcrime.com
The woman is absolutely corrupt. The evidence supports my conclusion.
Can you say the same?
Yes. Anything that smacks of actual justice MUST be a conspiracy.It's par for the course, Republican corruption and the their moronic enablers that vote for them.
This is what she was charged for:Yes. Anything that smacks of actual justice MUST be a conspiracy.
FWIW, this whole case seems to be with regard to the EIDL which was a COVID era loan program. All funds need to be paid back by the borrower so I'm not sure where "stealing" even came in to this. The tiny bit of information that was available seems to indicate that the charge was with regard to a false application but that should be pretty easy to sort out and, apparently, it has been.
The complaint said Amesty received more than $100,000 and that most of the funds were not used for the purpose intended for the loans. Investigators also allegedly found discrepancies with bank accounts, deposits, and the number of employees listed on the original applications for some of the organizations, according to the complaint.
They think this is owning the libs so of course they are good with it.This is what she was charged for:
Ex-Florida lawmaker Carolina Amesty, accused of stealing COVID-19 funds, appears in federal court
Following a first appearance in court earlier today, ex-Florida lawmaker Carolina Amesty has been released on several conditions after being accused of stealing money through COVID-19 loans.www.fox35orlando.com
She's one of the many people that took that money and used it for anything she wanted. Maybe you're fine with all of that, I'm not.
According to the article you posted she was charged before her lawyers could present any evidence. That's pretty shitty and any ethical prosecutor would hold off on charges until there was a full investigation. The whole thing smacks of exactly what she said it does, political persecution.This is what she was charged for:
Ex-Florida lawmaker Carolina Amesty, accused of stealing COVID-19 funds, appears in federal court
Following a first appearance in court earlier today, ex-Florida lawmaker Carolina Amesty has been released on several conditions after being accused of stealing money through COVID-19 loans.www.fox35orlando.com
She's one of the many people that took that money and used it for anything she wanted. Maybe you're fine with all of that, I'm not.
Sure, every politician that gets busted claims political persecution, only the guidable typically believe it.According to the article you posted she was charged before her lawyers could present any evidence. That's pretty shitty and any ethical prosecutor would hold off on charges until there was a full investigation. The whole thing smacks of exactly what she said it does, political persecution.
Bondi is well known for taking bribes.
Her brother tried a case in which she has subject matter authority.
This is absolutely inappropriate.
Pam Bondi accused of "serious misconduct" in Florida Bar complaint
The DOJ called the complaint "performative" and "vexatious."www.newsweek.com
The Trump Foundation-Pam Bondi scandal - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
In March 2016, CREW discovered that the Trump Foundation had broken the law by giving an illegal $25,000 contribution to a political group supporting Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi. This would set off an investigation which would lead to one of the biggest stories of the year. Here’s how it...www.citizensforethics.org
'More Corruption and Abuse' on the Way as Bondi Fires DOJ Ethics Chief | Common Dreams
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi fired Joseph Tirrell as director of the Departmental Ethics Office, further elevating concerns over her control of the Department of Justice.www.commondreams.org
Group Files Corruption Complaint with FBI Against Pam Bondi Over Trump Donation | Law & Crime
The Democratic Coalition against Trump has filed a complaint with the FBI's Public Corruption unit against Floriday Attorney General Pam Bondi.lawandcrime.com
The woman is absolutely corrupt. The evidence supports my conclusion.
Can you say the same?
Wait a minute. How do you get from she had charges filed against her to hatred? That's pretty big leap.So liberal groups filed ridiculous complaints against Bondi and you call that "evidence".
We get it, you hate Bondi and anyone else remotely associated with Trump. Your hatred (and that of the people that feed your hatred) isn't evidence of anything untoward and the fact that you spin EVERYTHING into a negative against those you hate belies a political focus and bias that just might be unhealthy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?