BCR
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2010
- Messages
- 598
- Reaction score
- 178
- Location
- Heart of Dixie
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
Yeah abd Heroin, coke and every hard drug and then we can get stoned out of our ****ing minds get out on the high way and play bumper cars........one big 300,000,000 million stoner party..........
I would caveat what the Rev said with the opinion that no public money be spent on any pot smoker that gets himself in trouble with it. Your freedom is your responsibility. Don't bitch if you lose your job, your health or anything else.
I would caveat what the Rev said with the opinion that no public money be spent on any pot smoker that gets himself in trouble with it. Your freedom is your responsibility. Don't bitch if you lose your job, your health or anything else.
I doubt it. Every business has a right to tell you not to drink at work obviously, but at work? No they can't do that it's your time and it's legal to drink. It would probably revert to a mouth swab which typically only works if you had smoked the same day. btw why do cops go to poison control if "exposed" to marijuana that cracks me up. Is that a protocol thing or what?
Right and wrong aside, it comes down to a factual basis. I think we should look at a law objectively, with a preponderance of evidence burden. If we can show evidence equal to or outweighing any negative evidence we should vote the law into effect. The means by which we vote it into effect can make up for the difference between the positive evidence and the negative evidence; ie, the better the law, the more underhanded tactics you can use to get it passed, IMO.
Of course, this all is based upon the ability to quantify the effects of a given law.
Doesn't alcohol destroy brain calls?
Doesn't second hand tabacco smoke cause Cancer...
Doesn't over use of Tylenol lead to liver problems...
You do realise we aren't the smartest species on this planet. If anything, we are by far the dumbest. We know whats good for us, yet we don't do it.
A study recently published found that the drug by far most harmful to Society was alcohol. You simply cannot refute that. I don't see weed causing broken families, I don't see weed causing a husband to beat his wife and children.
Now granted weed can have negative effects, I have felt some of them. But don't start waving the effects in peoples faces and saying "HEY LOOK ITS BAD FOR YOU!" Who the **** cares whats bad for us? Certainly not as bad for you as a ****ing Triple Whopper I'll tell you that.
Officials did not put this on the ballot, in Ca if you have X amount of people sign a petition as a percentage of voters from the last election cycle then it goes on the ballot, officials do not have a choice in this matter.
This initiative and the signature collection effort was spear headed by the founder of Oaksterdam university, and further promoted by word of mouth and other pro-legalization organizations, not democrat operatives, they had nothing to do with the signature drive, nor enforcement of the law which allowed (mandated) this to go on the ballot when x amount of signatures were collected.
So, if I wanted to get more democrats to get off their ass and come out to vote for my democrat candidate, how would I accomplish that? Oh! I know, get a democrat wedge issue put on the ballot! They can't stop me! It's the law!
And vice versa.
I get it.
Bad law.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?