• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pro-Life: "Post Abortion" is OK

JayDubya said:
Abortionists and their clients ARE both very likely to kill again. That is part of why they belong in prison for the rest of their lives. If you believe in the death penalty - I don't - and you think it should be applied to those who commit aggressive homicide with malice aforethought (generally charged as capital murder or murder in the first degree, varying by jurisdiction), then logically, you ought to think this penalty should apply to abortionists and their clients.




Remorseless killers with no respect for the rights of other human beings belong in prison. If they die in the act of killing others, that's fine, saves on room and board. I stand by that 100%.

As I recall this was somehow stupidly and dishonestly characterized as "hating women..."

... when I would say no different about some dude who killed others.


I would not have wanted the death penalty for Tamerlan Tsarnaev. You may wish to note that he's a guy. He killed lots of innocent people and hurt a lot more. He got shot and killed resisting arrest. I'm pretty cool with that. I don't know about you...
Click to expand...

You of course only mean women. You're just fine with a man deliberately causing needless deaths of hundreds of unborn babies.
 
JayDubya said:
Abortionists and their clients ARE both very likely to kill again. That is part of why they belong in prison for the rest of their lives. If you believe in the death penalty - I don't - and you think it should be applied to those who commit aggressive homicide with malice aforethought (generally charged as capital murder or murder in the first degree, varying by jurisdiction), then logically, you ought to think this penalty should apply to abortionists and their clients.




Remorseless killers with no respect for the rights of other human beings belong in prison. If they die in the act of killing others, that's fine, saves on room and board. I stand by that 100%.

As I recall this was somehow stupidly and dishonestly characterized as "hating women..."

... when I would say no different about some dude who killed others.


I would not have wanted the death penalty for Tamerlan Tsarnaev. You may wish to note that he's a guy. He killed lots of innocent people and hurt a lot more. He got shot and killed resisting arrest. I'm pretty cool with that. I don't know about you...
Click to expand...

Of course you don't want Tamerlan Tsarnaev to die. He's a man. Only women "deserve" to die in your religion.
 
joko104 said:
You of course only mean women. You're just fine with a man deliberately causing needless deaths of hundreds of unborn babies.
Click to expand...

Unmitigated nonsense, absent even the slightest hint of reason or logical support.

joko104 said:
Of course you don't want Tamerlan Tsarnaev to die. He's a man. Only women "deserve" to die in your religion.
Click to expand...

Stupid, ignorant defamation.

If you're going to quote it twice, read it at least once... if you can perform that difficult task. First line... in bold...
 
joko104 said:
I suppose I could also search out Herrin claiming it is best that a newborn baby be thrown in a dumpster than a girl have an abortion.
Click to expand...

I wish you luck in finding something I said that I never actually said.
 
Henrin said:
I wish you luck in finding something I said that I never actually said.
Click to expand...

Why, you won't leave if I did anyway. But specifically you stated you would rather be born and thrown into a dumpster than having been aborted, with some philosophy about experiencing life or something - which also shows what value you would give to the woman who went thru 9 months pregnancy and labor - even risking her life - so you could enjoy as a newborn the pleasure of dying in a dumpter of thirst, the elements or getting eaten alive by rats.

Pretty darn sure that was you.
 
joko104 said:
Why, you won't leave if I did anyway. But specifically you stated you would rather be born and thrown into a dumpster than having been aborted, with some philosophy about experiencing life or something - which also shows what value you would give to the woman who went thru 9 months pregnancy and labor - even risking her life - so you could enjoy as a newborn the pleasure of dying in a dumpter of thirst, the elements or getting eaten alive by rats.

Pretty darn sure that was you.
Click to expand...

As I said, I wish you luck in finding where I said that.
 
Henrin said:
How is that saying he "wanted" women to die??
Click to expand...


SmokeandMirrors posted... "What might happen, though, is that more women will wind up in the hospital."

JayDubya responded: "And then prison, as deserved. Or just dead, and equally deserved."
 
JayDubya said:
Unmitigated nonsense, absent even the slightest hint of reason or logical support.



Stupid, ignorant defamation.

If you're going to quote it twice, read it at least once... if you can perform that difficult task. First line... in bold...
Click to expand...

Yeah, just keep up your diversion raging over you're being just fine with men creating millions and million of "unborn babies just to die", while claiming if a woman destroys just 1 she should go to prison and "deserved" to be "dead."

Unlimited total hypocrisy for your own trivial conveniences raging that you have NO obligations against your baby-killing religious slogans, combined with unlimted hatred of women.
 
joko104 said:
Yeah, just keep up your diversion raging over you're being just fine with men creating millions and million of "unborn babies just to die", while claiming if a woman destroys just 1 she should go to prison and "deserved" to be "dead."

Unlimited total hypocrisy for your own trivial conveniences raging that you have NO obligations against your baby-killing religious slogans, combined with unlimted hatred of women.
Click to expand...

There is nothing in your post that describes reality.

There is nothing in your post that is a coherent thought.


Does this thread even have a thesis or a purpose? At the moment it seems you are just throwing hyperpartisan flamebait nonsense at the wall and hoping something sticks.
 
joko104 said:
Why, you won't leave if I did anyway. But specifically you stated you would rather be born and thrown into a dumpster than having been aborted, with some philosophy about experiencing life or something - which also shows what value you would give to the woman who went thru 9 months pregnancy and labor - even risking her life - so you could enjoy as a newborn the pleasure of dying in a dumpter of thirst, the elements or getting eaten alive by rats.

Pretty darn sure that was you.
Click to expand...

No it was actually RapidAlpca not Henrin I believe

Being aborted in the womb and out the womb as an infant surprising is the same as both can't comprehend a future life for themselves. The only difference really is that a infant is a sentient being with a mind

Anyways in real life, a smart women won't dump a infant in a dumpster. She would take the infant to a secluded area and leave the infant there to die out/kill it immediately. She will dump the body in the secluded area out of visual sight so no one walking by will see the body.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom