Get off my property!
What are the thoughts today from Liberal Progressives about those who own large parcels of land? Does the owner have the right to the land he purchased or does it belong to the collective?
-VySky
Get off my property!
What are the thoughts today from Liberal Progressives about those who own large parcels of land? Does the owner have the right to the land he purchased or does it belong to the collective?
-VySky
Uh.......what the what?
Get off my property!
What are the thoughts today from Liberal Progressives about those who own large parcels of land? Does the owner have the right to the land he purchased or does it belong to the collective?
-VySky
Get off my property!
What are the thoughts today from Liberal Progressives about those who own large parcels of land? Does the owner have the right to the land he purchased or does it belong to the collective?
-VySky
Get off my property!
What are the thoughts today from Liberal Progressives about those who own large parcels of land? Does the owner have the right to the land he purchased or does it belong to the collective?
-VySky
If you think hippies high on weed are gonna take away your land, you deserve it.
If Trump is going to build his wall he will need to "TAKE" hundreds of miles of land.
In the process Trump will also cut people off from 1000's of acres of farm / range lands they will still own.
If that doesn't sound fair well the President needs to fulfill his promise and the only way is to "TAKE" land from people who own it.
Eminent domain, the big-government tactic Trump needs to build the wall, explained - Vox
The process by which the government can take private land to use it for public purposes is fairly straightforward.
Lawrence Tribe, a professor of constitutional law at Harvard Law School, says a private landowner is approached by a government agency that wants their land, that agency “typically gives them a deadline by which they must either sell the designated parcel of land to the federal government at the price offered by the government, or have it involuntarily taken by eminent domain at fair market value.” On the border, that agency might be the Department of Defense, the Corps of Engineers, or the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
If Trump is going to build his wall he will need to "TAKE" hundreds of miles of land.
In the process Trump will also cut people off from 1000's of acres of farm / range lands they will still own.
If that doesn't sound fair well the President needs to fulfill his promise and the only way is to "TAKE" land from people who own it.
Eminent domain, the big-government tactic Trump needs to build the wall, explained - Vox
The process by which the government can take private land to use it for public purposes is fairly straightforward.
Lawrence Tribe, a professor of constitutional law at Harvard Law School, says a private landowner is approached by a government agency that wants their land, that agency “typically gives them a deadline by which they must either sell the designated parcel of land to the federal government at the price offered by the government, or have it involuntarily taken by eminent domain at fair market value.” On the border, that agency might be the Department of Defense, the Corps of Engineers, or the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Get off my property!
What are the thoughts today from Liberal Progressives about those who own large parcels of land? Does the owner have the right to the land he purchased or does it belong to the collective?
-VySky
I wonder if Vy thinks it would be worse if they were Jewish hippies, rich Jewish hippies.
Get off my property!
What are the thoughts today from Liberal Progressives about those who own large parcels of land? Does the owner have the right to the land he purchased or does it belong to the collective?
-VySky
Nice strawman thread.
What’s the straw man?
Get off my property!
What are the thoughts today from Liberal Progressives about those who own large parcels of land? Does the owner have the right to the land he purchased or does it belong to the collective?
-VySky
I strongly support personal property rights - including land.
I do not agree that personal land can be seized for economic development.
The government should be required to pay the value and usage lose to property (land) by zoning or other regulations.
The government should not be allowed to seize anyone's property - monetary, personal or land - with first obtaining a final court judgement, with the burden strictly upon the government to prove its case.
It is reasonable to place restrictions on land use if that usage would negatively affect others in substantive ways. For example, no raising pigs in city limits, no burning trash within city limits and other reasonable regulations. However, I do think it should be a crime if a person doesn't mow their yard.
That any "socialist" (aka, the modern progressive in the viewpoint of modern right wingers) politician or voter believes in land being owned by the "collective".
That statement was never made.
Get off my property!
What are the thoughts today from Liberal Progressives about those who own large parcels of land? Does the owner have the right to the land he purchased or does it belong to the collective?
-VySky
Get off my property!
What are the thoughts today from Liberal Progressives about those who own large parcels of land? Does the owner have the right to the land he purchased or does it belong to the collective?
-VySky
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?