My BIL just retired from the NYPD. It's actually standard procedure for cops to pull over people committing small crimes, like jaywalking & turnstile jumping. They find criminals with warrants out on them and other malfeasance.
Yea, that's it. Brown charged a cop, head down, while being shot. :roll:
I am not insulting you. It is a serious question, considering the attitudes you brought forward so far.
Again. I am am not insulting you. I want to know, do you burn crosses? Are you a racist?
That does not confirm the cops innocence.
No, but it impacts the narrative that he was a sweet child trying to surrender to police.
Yes, yes we do, from the autopsy.
Was Brown jaywalking or walking down the middle of the street? I thought it was the middle of the street.
It does affect your ability to make rational decisions and can cause panic and paranoia.
Was Brown jaywalking or walking down the middle of the street? I thought it was the middle of the street.
If the poster is going to say he simply stole a snack, then the poster is saying that was him in the video. Because the large person in that video clearly was stealing and then went on to assault the store owner.
Of course not. Why would that matter? Now why don't you answer my questions.
I am not insulting you. It is a serious question, considering the attitudes you brought forward so far.
Again. I am am not insulting you. I want to know, do you burn crosses? Are you a racist?
The point was disproving the witnesses account of Brown being shot in the back.
The only thing that was debunked was that Brown was shot in the back. What was corroborated was the following:Not, it doesn't confirm anything and the accomplice's statements have been debunked one by one.
Irrelevant to this case as Brown was not pulled over because of the robbery. So, why do folks continue to bring it up? No one is still claiming Brown was some angel. I'm certainly not.And to remind you, it wasn't a shoplifting but a strong arm robbery. Reduce and excuse, same old formula.
Same thing.
Yes, the person in the video was. We don't know who that is for sure.
The basis of this of this case is not what position brown was in at the time he was shot. The basis of this case is why did the officer shoot brown in the first place.
Yes, the person in the video was. We don't know who that is for sure.
No. But it changes your response to stressors...like having a loaded gun pointed at you. Come on, don't play that card. It is well documented that *some* troops get high before combat. And that high causes a different reaction for different people.
The consumption of khat and other drugs - PubMed Mobile
The only thing that was debunked was that Brown was shot in the back. What was corroborated was the following:
1 - Brown and the officer were in physical contact at one point.
2 - Brown and the officer were separated by some distance (enough to avoid getting GSR on his skin).
3 - Brown did indeed turn to face the officer.
4 - The officer shot Brown multiple times.
Irrelevant to this case as Brown was not pulled over because of the robbery. So, why do folks continue to bring it up? No one is still claiming Brown was some angel. I'm certainly not.
It doesn't matter who it is, because Dorian Johnson admitted that he and Brown robbed a store prior to the shooting.
Bringing up Browns strong armed robbery could go to explain his response and reaction to the cop being there. If it's true the cop was unaware of Browns actions at the C-Store, how would Brown know that?
Why is it that so hard to understand?
The only thing that was debunked was that Brown was shot in the back. What was corroborated was the following:
1 - Brown and the officer were in physical contact at one point.
2 - Brown and the officer were separated by some distance (enough to avoid getting GSR on his skin).
3 - Brown did indeed turn to face the officer.
4 - The officer shot Brown multiple times.
Irrelevant to this case as Brown was not pulled over because of the robbery. So, why do folks continue to bring it up? No one is still claiming Brown was some angel. I'm certainly not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?