Prisoners Awarded Millions as Victims of Kamala Harris Frame-Ups While She Was Prosecutor, Mostly Black Men

[munkle]

​

Prisoners Awarded Millions as Victims of Kamala Harris Frame-Ups While She Was Prosecutor​

Not all of the men prosecuted by Harris have been so fortunate as to have their fair day in court. George Gage is a name that should haunt Kamala Harris.

In 1998 the mother of Gage’s alleged victim, his stepdaughter who said he had raped her, told mental health workers while Gage was being prosecuted, that the daughter was “a pathological liar [who] lives her lies.” Neither the defense nor the jury were ever allowed to see these words, which would have impeached the testimony of the daughter, as her story changed continually and was filled with inconsistencies. Harris’s prosecutors fought to suppress the mother’s words at trial....

Lara Bazelon, law professor and the former director of the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent in Los Angeles, wrote for the New York Times in January 2019:

“In 2015, when the case reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, Ms. Harris’s prosecutors defended the conviction. They pointed out that Mr. Gage, while forced to act as his own lawyer, had not properly raised the legal issue in the lower court, as the law required.

The appellate judges acknowledged this impediment and sent the case to mediation, a clear signal for Ms. Harris to dismiss the case. When she refused to budge, the court upheld the conviction on that technicality. Mr. Gage is still in prison serving a 70-year sentence.”


In 2018, a civil jury in California found that police and prosecutors working under then-San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris had deliberately fabricated evidence and failed to disclose exculpatory material in the malicious prosecution of Jamal Trulove, for the shooting murder of his friend Seu Kuka.

Carla Bell at the Miami Herald writes:

“For years, AKA Harris has delivered a ruthless brand of “service.” Under Harris, the New York Times recounted, prosecutors “unlawfully held back potentially exculpatory evidence” in the case of George Gage, resulting in a 70-year sentence at San Quentin on charges of sexual abuse. Those charges were later proven false and dismissed by the trial judge, but upheld under appeal on technicality. Because Harris declined to withdraw prosecution, Gage, now 80 and partially blind, remains incarcerated, still, 20 years later.”

In February 2010 29-year-old Jamal Trulove was convicted of killing 28-year-old Seu Kuka based on the testimony of a lone witness

In March 2019, Mr. Trulove was awarded a $13.1 million settlement for his wrongful prosecution and conviction. San Francisco DA Kamala Harris showed up twice at his trial. Once at his conviction, and the second at his sentencing, during which Trulove says that he looked back and they “locked eyes,” and she began laughing at him as he was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison."

Below source: NPR

Caramad Conley

The Washington Examiner wrote in September 2019 in “Five times prosecutor Kamala Harris got the wrong guy”:


“In 1992, Caramad Conley was arrested for a drive-by gang shooting that killed two men in San Francisco. After the prosecution’s key witness testified that 18-year-old Conley had privately confessed to the murder, Conley was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Although the witness denied under oath that he had been compensated as part of the case, a subsequent investigation found that a detective had paid the witness. ... He later received a $3.5 million settlement from the city for wrongful conviction.

 

[noonereal]

​

Prisoners Awarded Millions as Victims of Kamala Harris Frame-Ups While She Was Prosecutor​

Not all of the men prosecuted by Harris have been so fortunate as to have their fair day in court. George Gage is a name that should haunt Kamala Harris.

In 1998 the mother of Gage’s alleged victim, his stepdaughter who said he had raped her, told mental health workers while Gage was being prosecuted, that the daughter was “a pathological liar [who] lives her lies.” Neither the defense nor the jury were ever allowed to see these words, which would have impeached the testimony of the daughter, as her story changed continually and was filled with inconsistencies. Harris’s prosecutors fought to suppress the mother’s words at trial....

Lara Bazelon, law professor and the former director of the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent in Los Angeles, wrote for the New York Times in January 2019:

“In 2015, when the case reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, Ms. Harris’s prosecutors defended the conviction. They pointed out that Mr. Gage, while forced to act as his own lawyer, had not properly raised the legal issue in the lower court, as the law required.

The appellate judges acknowledged this impediment and sent the case to mediation, a clear signal for Ms. Harris to dismiss the case. When she refused to budge, the court upheld the conviction on that technicality. Mr. Gage is still in prison serving a 70-year sentence.”


In 2018, a civil jury in California found that police and prosecutors working under then-San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris had deliberately fabricated evidence and failed to disclose exculpatory material in the malicious prosecution of Jamal Trulove, for the shooting murder of his friend Seu Kuka.

Carla Bell at the Miami Herald writes:

“For years, AKA Harris has delivered a ruthless brand of “service.” Under Harris, the New York Times recounted, prosecutors “unlawfully held back potentially exculpatory evidence” in the case of George Gage, resulting in a 70-year sentence at San Quentin on charges of sexual abuse. Those charges were later proven false and dismissed by the trial judge, but upheld under appeal on technicality. Because Harris declined to withdraw prosecution, Gage, now 80 and partially blind, remains incarcerated, still, 20 years later.”

In February 2010 29-year-old Jamal Trulove was convicted of killing 28-year-old Seu Kuka based on the testimony of a lone witness

In March 2019, Mr. Trulove was awarded a $13.1 million settlement for his wrongful prosecution and conviction. San Francisco DA Kamala Harris showed up twice at his trial. Once at his conviction, and the second at his sentencing, during which Trulove says that he looked back and they “locked eyes,” and she began laughing at him as he was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison."

Below source: NPR

Caramad Conley

The Washington Examiner wrote in September 2019 in “Five times prosecutor Kamala Harris got the wrong guy”:


“In 1992, Caramad Conley was arrested for a drive-by gang shooting that killed two men in San Francisco. After the prosecution’s key witness testified that 18-year-old Conley had privately confessed to the murder, Conley was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Although the witness denied under oath that he had been compensated as part of the case, a subsequent investigation found that a detective had paid the witness. ... He later received a $3.5 million settlement from the city for wrongful conviction.

Lol

Thanks for the meaningless thread.

 

[KingLeo]

Prisoners Awarded Millions as Victims of Kamala Harris Frame-Ups While She Was Prosecutor

Not all of the men prosecuted by Harris have been so fortunate as to have their fair day in court. George Gage is a name that should haunt Kamala Harris.

In 1998 the mother of Gage’s alleged victim, his stepdaughter who said he had raped her, told mental health workers while Gage was being prosecuted, that the daughter was “a pathological liar [who] lives her lies.” Neither the defense nor the jury were ever allowed to see these words, which would have impeached the testimony of the daughter, as her story changed continually and was filled with inconsistencies. Harris’s prosecutors fought to suppress the mother’s words at trial....

Lara Bazelon, law professor and the former director of the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent in Los Angeles, wrote for the New York Times in January 2019:

“In 2015, when the case reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, Ms. Harris’s prosecutors defended the conviction. They pointed out that Mr. Gage, while forced to act as his own lawyer, had not properly raised the legal issue in the lower court, as the law required.

The appellate judges acknowledged this impediment and sent the case to mediation, a clear signal for Ms. Harris to dismiss the case. When she refused to budge, the court upheld the conviction on that technicality. Mr. Gage is still in prison serving a 70-year sentence.”


In 2018, a civil jury in California found that police and prosecutors working under then-San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris had deliberately fabricated evidence and failed to disclose exculpatory material in the malicious prosecution of Jamal Trulove, for the shooting murder of his friend Seu Kuka.

Carla Bell at the Miami Herald writes:

“For years, AKA Harris has delivered a ruthless brand of “service.” Under Harris, the New York Times recounted, prosecutors “unlawfully held back potentially exculpatory evidence” in the case of George Gage, resulting in a 70-year sentence at San Quentin on charges of sexual abuse. Those charges were later proven false and dismissed by the trial judge, but upheld under appeal on technicality. Because Harris declined to withdraw prosecution, Gage, now 80 and partially blind, remains incarcerated, still, 20 years later.”

In February 2010 29-year-old Jamal Trulove was convicted of killing 28-year-old Seu Kuka based on the testimony of a lone witness

In March 2019, Mr. Trulove was awarded a $13.1 million settlement for his wrongful prosecution and conviction. San Francisco DA Kamala Harris showed up twice at his trial. Once at his conviction, and the second at his sentencing, during which Trulove says that he looked back and they “locked eyes,” and she began laughing at him as he was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison."

Below source: NPR

Caramad Conley

The Washington Examiner wrote in September 2019 in “Five times prosecutor Kamala Harris got the wrong guy”:


“In 1992, Caramad Conley was arrested for a drive-by gang shooting that killed two men in San Francisco. After the prosecution’s key witness testified that 18-year-old Conley had privately confessed to the murder, Conley was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Although the witness denied under oath that he had been compensated as part of the case, a subsequent investigation found that a detective had paid the witness. ... He later received a $3.5 million settlement from the city for wrongful conviction.

What you fail to understand is that Harris, as the prosecutor, does not investigate cases. She goes by the evidence presented and gathered by police.
Each example above shows the errors were made by the police and investigators.

 

[noonereal]

What you fail to understand is that Harris, as the prosecutor, does not investigate cases.

Scary that you had to post this.

 

[KingLeo]

Scary that you had to post this.

Mistakes are made by investigators and the police all the time, all over the country.

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

​

Prisoners Awarded Millions as Victims of Kamala Harris Frame-Ups While She Was Prosecutor​

Not all of the men prosecuted by Harris have been so fortunate as to have their fair day in court. George Gage is a name that should haunt Kamala Harris.

In 1998 the mother of Gage’s alleged victim, his stepdaughter who said he had raped her, told mental health workers while Gage was being prosecuted, that the daughter was “a pathological liar [who] lives her lies.” Neither the defense nor the jury were ever allowed to see these words, which would have impeached the testimony of the daughter, as her story changed continually and was filled with inconsistencies. Harris’s prosecutors fought to suppress the mother’s words at trial....

Lara Bazelon, law professor and the former director of the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent in Los Angeles, wrote for the New York Times in January 2019:

“In 2015, when the case reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, Ms. Harris’s prosecutors defended the conviction. They pointed out that Mr. Gage, while forced to act as his own lawyer, had not properly raised the legal issue in the lower court, as the law required.

The appellate judges acknowledged this impediment and sent the case to mediation, a clear signal for Ms. Harris to dismiss the case. When she refused to budge, the court upheld the conviction on that technicality. Mr. Gage is still in prison serving a 70-year sentence.”


In 2018, a civil jury in California found that police and prosecutors working under then-San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris had deliberately fabricated evidence and failed to disclose exculpatory material in the malicious prosecution of Jamal Trulove, for the shooting murder of his friend Seu Kuka.

Carla Bell at the Miami Herald writes:

“For years, AKA Harris has delivered a ruthless brand of “service.” Under Harris, the New York Times recounted, prosecutors “unlawfully held back potentially exculpatory evidence” in the case of George Gage, resulting in a 70-year sentence at San Quentin on charges of sexual abuse. Those charges were later proven false and dismissed by the trial judge, but upheld under appeal on technicality. Because Harris declined to withdraw prosecution, Gage, now 80 and partially blind, remains incarcerated, still, 20 years later.”

In February 2010 29-year-old Jamal Trulove was convicted of killing 28-year-old Seu Kuka based on the testimony of a lone witness

In March 2019, Mr. Trulove was awarded a $13.1 million settlement for his wrongful prosecution and conviction. San Francisco DA Kamala Harris showed up twice at his trial. Once at his conviction, and the second at his sentencing, during which Trulove says that he looked back and they “locked eyes,” and she began laughing at him as he was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison."

Below source: NPR

Caramad Conley

The Washington Examiner wrote in September 2019 in “Five times prosecutor Kamala Harris got the wrong guy”:


“In 1992, Caramad Conley was arrested for a drive-by gang shooting that killed two men in San Francisco. After the prosecution’s key witness testified that 18-year-old Conley had privately confessed to the murder, Conley was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Although the witness denied under oath that he had been compensated as part of the case, a subsequent investigation found that a detective had paid the witness. ... He later received a $3.5 million settlement from the city for wrongful conviction.

Yes, but what did her next door neighbor's second cousin's former girlfriend's third grade best friend's brother's stepfathers grandfather do?

 

[George50]

And Trump still won’t admit that the Central Park 5 are innocent even after DNA evidence proved it. I guess that makes sense though. The courts told him 60 times that his election whining is nonsense but he still persists there too.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

​

Prisoners Awarded Millions as Victims of Kamala Harris Frame-Ups While She Was Prosecutor​

Not all of the men prosecuted by Harris have been so fortunate as to have their fair day in court. George Gage is a name that should haunt Kamala Harris.

In 1998 the mother of Gage’s alleged victim, his stepdaughter who said he had raped her, told mental health workers while Gage was being prosecuted, that the daughter was “a pathological liar [who] lives her lies.” Neither the defense nor the jury were ever allowed to see these words, which would have impeached the testimony of the daughter, as her story changed continually and was filled with inconsistencies. Harris’s prosecutors fought to suppress the mother’s words at trial....

Lara Bazelon, law professor and the former director of the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent in Los Angeles, wrote for the New York Times in January 2019:

“In 2015, when the case reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, Ms. Harris’s prosecutors defended the conviction. They pointed out that Mr. Gage, while forced to act as his own lawyer, had not properly raised the legal issue in the lower court, as the law required.

The appellate judges acknowledged this impediment and sent the case to mediation, a clear signal for Ms. Harris to dismiss the case. When she refused to budge, the court upheld the conviction on that technicality. Mr. Gage is still in prison serving a 70-year sentence.”


In 2018, a civil jury in California found that police and prosecutors working under then-San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris had deliberately fabricated evidence and failed to disclose exculpatory material in the malicious prosecution of Jamal Trulove, for the shooting murder of his friend Seu Kuka.

Carla Bell at the Miami Herald writes:

“For years, AKA Harris has delivered a ruthless brand of “service.” Under Harris, the New York Times recounted, prosecutors “unlawfully held back potentially exculpatory evidence” in the case of George Gage, resulting in a 70-year sentence at San Quentin on charges of sexual abuse. Those charges were later proven false and dismissed by the trial judge, but upheld under appeal on technicality. Because Harris declined to withdraw prosecution, Gage, now 80 and partially blind, remains incarcerated, still, 20 years later.”

In February 2010 29-year-old Jamal Trulove was convicted of killing 28-year-old Seu Kuka based on the testimony of a lone witness

In March 2019, Mr. Trulove was awarded a $13.1 million settlement for his wrongful prosecution and conviction. San Francisco DA Kamala Harris showed up twice at his trial. Once at his conviction, and the second at his sentencing, during which Trulove says that he looked back and they “locked eyes,” and she began laughing at him as he was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison."

Below source: NPR

Caramad Conley

The Washington Examiner wrote in September 2019 in “Five times prosecutor Kamala Harris got the wrong guy”:


“In 1992, Caramad Conley was arrested for a drive-by gang shooting that killed two men in San Francisco. After the prosecution’s key witness testified that 18-year-old Conley had privately confessed to the murder, Conley was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Although the witness denied under oath that he had been compensated as part of the case, a subsequent investigation found that a detective had paid the witness. ... He later received a $3.5 million settlement from the city for wrongful conviction.

 

[mrjurrs]

​

Prisoners Awarded Millions as Victims of Kamala Harris Frame-Ups While She Was Prosecutor​

Not all of the men prosecuted by Harris have been so fortunate as to have their fair day in court. George Gage is a name that should haunt Kamala Harris.

In 1998 the mother of Gage’s alleged victim, his stepdaughter who said he had raped her, told mental health workers while Gage was being prosecuted, that the daughter was “a pathological liar [who] lives her lies.” Neither the defense nor the jury were ever allowed to see these words, which would have impeached the testimony of the daughter, as her story changed continually and was filled with inconsistencies. Harris’s prosecutors fought to suppress the mother’s words at trial....

Lara Bazelon, law professor and the former director of the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent in Los Angeles, wrote for the New York Times in January 2019:

“In 2015, when the case reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, Ms. Harris’s prosecutors defended the conviction. They pointed out that Mr. Gage, while forced to act as his own lawyer, had not properly raised the legal issue in the lower court, as the law required.

The appellate judges acknowledged this impediment and sent the case to mediation, a clear signal for Ms. Harris to dismiss the case. When she refused to budge, the court upheld the conviction on that technicality. Mr. Gage is still in prison serving a 70-year sentence.”


In 2018, a civil jury in California found that police and prosecutors working under then-San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris had deliberately fabricated evidence and failed to disclose exculpatory material in the malicious prosecution of Jamal Trulove, for the shooting murder of his friend Seu Kuka.

Carla Bell at the Miami Herald writes:

“For years, AKA Harris has delivered a ruthless brand of “service.” Under Harris, the New York Times recounted, prosecutors “unlawfully held back potentially exculpatory evidence” in the case of George Gage, resulting in a 70-year sentence at San Quentin on charges of sexual abuse. Those charges were later proven false and dismissed by the trial judge, but upheld under appeal on technicality. Because Harris declined to withdraw prosecution, Gage, now 80 and partially blind, remains incarcerated, still, 20 years later.”

In February 2010 29-year-old Jamal Trulove was convicted of killing 28-year-old Seu Kuka based on the testimony of a lone witness

In March 2019, Mr. Trulove was awarded a $13.1 million settlement for his wrongful prosecution and conviction. San Francisco DA Kamala Harris showed up twice at his trial. Once at his conviction, and the second at his sentencing, during which Trulove says that he looked back and they “locked eyes,” and she began laughing at him as he was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison."

Below source: NPR

Caramad Conley

The Washington Examiner wrote in September 2019 in “Five times prosecutor Kamala Harris got the wrong guy”:


“In 1992, Caramad Conley was arrested for a drive-by gang shooting that killed two men in San Francisco. After the prosecution’s key witness testified that 18-year-old Conley had privately confessed to the murder, Conley was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Although the witness denied under oath that he had been compensated as part of the case, a subsequent investigation found that a detective had paid the witness. ... He later received a $3.5 million settlement from the city for wrongful conviction.

DA's make mistakes, and police mislead DA's. Has she been legally rebuked by any court?

 

[BirdinHand]

“Vice President Harris vigorously prosecuted cases of sexual assault and murder while in her former professions”

Doesn’t seem to match up so much with she’s really someone completely in favor of open borders that has and wants to let rapists, drug dealers and murderers into the US because she’s some sort of communist or something?




Which one is it?

 

[tshade]

​

Prisoners Awarded Millions as Victims of Kamala Harris Frame-Ups While She Was Prosecutor​

Not all of the men prosecuted by Harris have been so fortunate as to have their fair day in court. George Gage is a name that should haunt Kamala Harris.

In 1998 the mother of Gage’s alleged victim, his stepdaughter who said he had raped her, told mental health workers while Gage was being prosecuted, that the daughter was “a pathological liar [who] lives her lies.” Neither the defense nor the jury were ever allowed to see these words, which would have impeached the testimony of the daughter, as her story changed continually and was filled with inconsistencies. Harris’s prosecutors fought to suppress the mother’s words at trial....

Lara Bazelon, law professor and the former director of the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent in Los Angeles, wrote for the New York Times in January 2019:

“In 2015, when the case reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, Ms. Harris’s prosecutors defended the conviction. They pointed out that Mr. Gage, while forced to act as his own lawyer, had not properly raised the legal issue in the lower court, as the law required.

The appellate judges acknowledged this impediment and sent the case to mediation, a clear signal for Ms. Harris to dismiss the case. When she refused to budge, the court upheld the conviction on that technicality. Mr. Gage is still in prison serving a 70-year sentence.”


In 2018, a civil jury in California found that police and prosecutors working under then-San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris had deliberately fabricated evidence and failed to disclose exculpatory material in the malicious prosecution of Jamal Trulove, for the shooting murder of his friend Seu Kuka.

Carla Bell at the Miami Herald writes:

“For years, AKA Harris has delivered a ruthless brand of “service.” Under Harris, the New York Times recounted, prosecutors “unlawfully held back potentially exculpatory evidence” in the case of George Gage, resulting in a 70-year sentence at San Quentin on charges of sexual abuse. Those charges were later proven false and dismissed by the trial judge, but upheld under appeal on technicality. Because Harris declined to withdraw prosecution, Gage, now 80 and partially blind, remains incarcerated, still, 20 years later.”

In February 2010 29-year-old Jamal Trulove was convicted of killing 28-year-old Seu Kuka based on the testimony of a lone witness

In March 2019, Mr. Trulove was awarded a $13.1 million settlement for his wrongful prosecution and conviction. San Francisco DA Kamala Harris showed up twice at his trial. Once at his conviction, and the second at his sentencing, during which Trulove says that he looked back and they “locked eyes,” and she began laughing at him as he was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison."

Below source: NPR

Caramad Conley

The Washington Examiner wrote in September 2019 in “Five times prosecutor Kamala Harris got the wrong guy”:


“In 1992, Caramad Conley was arrested for a drive-by gang shooting that killed two men in San Francisco. After the prosecution’s key witness testified that 18-year-old Conley had privately confessed to the murder, Conley was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Although the witness denied under oath that he had been compensated as part of the case, a subsequent investigation found that a detective had paid the witness. ... He later received a $3.5 million settlement from the city for wrongful conviction.

???????? Harris is not the police..............

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

“Vice President Harris vigorously prosecuted cases of sexual assault and murder while in her former professions”

Doesn’t seem to match up so much with she’s really someone completely in favor of open borders that has and wants to let rapists, drug dealers and murderers into the US because she’s some sort of communist or something?




Which one is it?

Is today an odd numbered day or an even numbered day? That question has to be answered before yours can.

 

[BirdinHand]

Is today an odd numbered day or an even numbered day? That question has to be answered before yours can.

 

[Questerr]

​

Prisoners Awarded Millions as Victims of Kamala Harris Frame-Ups While She Was Prosecutor​

Not all of the men prosecuted by Harris have been so fortunate as to have their fair day in court. George Gage is a name that should haunt Kamala Harris.

In 1998 the mother of Gage’s alleged victim, his stepdaughter who said he had raped her, told mental health workers while Gage was being prosecuted, that the daughter was “a pathological liar [who] lives her lies.” Neither the defense nor the jury were ever allowed to see these words, which would have impeached the testimony of the daughter, as her story changed continually and was filled with inconsistencies. Harris’s prosecutors fought to suppress the mother’s words at trial....

Lara Bazelon, law professor and the former director of the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent in Los Angeles, wrote for the New York Times in January 2019:

“In 2015, when the case reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, Ms. Harris’s prosecutors defended the conviction. They pointed out that Mr. Gage, while forced to act as his own lawyer, had not properly raised the legal issue in the lower court, as the law required.

The appellate judges acknowledged this impediment and sent the case to mediation, a clear signal for Ms. Harris to dismiss the case. When she refused to budge, the court upheld the conviction on that technicality. Mr. Gage is still in prison serving a 70-year sentence.”


In 2018, a civil jury in California found that police and prosecutors working under then-San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris had deliberately fabricated evidence and failed to disclose exculpatory material in the malicious prosecution of Jamal Trulove, for the shooting murder of his friend Seu Kuka.

Carla Bell at the Miami Herald writes:

“For years, AKA Harris has delivered a ruthless brand of “service.” Under Harris, the New York Times recounted, prosecutors “unlawfully held back potentially exculpatory evidence” in the case of George Gage, resulting in a 70-year sentence at San Quentin on charges of sexual abuse. Those charges were later proven false and dismissed by the trial judge, but upheld under appeal on technicality. Because Harris declined to withdraw prosecution, Gage, now 80 and partially blind, remains incarcerated, still, 20 years later.”

In February 2010 29-year-old Jamal Trulove was convicted of killing 28-year-old Seu Kuka based on the testimony of a lone witness

In March 2019, Mr. Trulove was awarded a $13.1 million settlement for his wrongful prosecution and conviction. San Francisco DA Kamala Harris showed up twice at his trial. Once at his conviction, and the second at his sentencing, during which Trulove says that he looked back and they “locked eyes,” and she began laughing at him as he was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison."

Below source: NPR

Caramad Conley

The Washington Examiner wrote in September 2019 in “Five times prosecutor Kamala Harris got the wrong guy”:


“In 1992, Caramad Conley was arrested for a drive-by gang shooting that killed two men in San Francisco. After the prosecution’s key witness testified that 18-year-old Conley had privately confessed to the murder, Conley was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Although the witness denied under oath that he had been compensated as part of the case, a subsequent investigation found that a detective had paid the witness. ... He later received a $3.5 million settlement from the city for wrongful conviction.

Thank you for agreeing that there is in fact systemic racism in law enforcement and the courts. I’m glad you have gone woke.

 

[munkle]

What you fail to understand is that Harris, as the prosecutor, does not investigate cases. She goes by the evidence presented and gathered by police.
Each example above shows the errors were made by the police and investigators.

Suppression of evidence is not an error. it is active criminal behavior. I have never seen more disgusing apologetics for knowingly putting innocent Black men in jail.

 

[George50]

“Vice President Harris vigorously prosecuted cases of sexual assault and murder while in her former professions”

Doesn’t seem to match up so much with she’s really someone completely in favor of open borders that has and wants to let rapists, drug dealers and murderers into the US because she’s some sort of communist or something?




Which one is it?

It’s whatever fits their narrative at the time.

 

[bongsaway]

Lol

Thanks for the meaningless thread.

What do you mean meaningless? The police apparently framed this guy and somehow or other it became the doing of Harris and so she is guilty for....reasons.

 

[Beruit 1978]

Yeah, but Willie Brown endorses Kamala. She was a good lay, and deserves everything she can get. Mrs. Willie Brown couldn't be contacted for comment.

 

[KingLeo]

Suppression of evidence is not an error. it is active criminal behavior. I have never seen more disgusing apologetics for knowingly putting innocent Black men in jail.

In the one case I read the conviction was upheld so evidently no suppression of evidence was found.
A prosecutor relies on the evidence collected by investigators and when new evidence comes up cases are reviewed.

 

[Bodecea]

​

Prisoners Awarded Millions as Victims of Kamala Harris Frame-Ups While She Was Prosecutor​

Not all of the men prosecuted by Harris have been so fortunate as to have their fair day in court. George Gage is a name that should haunt Kamala Harris.

In 1998 the mother of Gage’s alleged victim, his stepdaughter who said he had raped her, told mental health workers while Gage was being prosecuted, that the daughter was “a pathological liar [who] lives her lies.” Neither the defense nor the jury were ever allowed to see these words, which would have impeached the testimony of the daughter, as her story changed continually and was filled with inconsistencies. Harris’s prosecutors fought to suppress the mother’s words at trial....

Lara Bazelon, law professor and the former director of the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent in Los Angeles, wrote for the New York Times in January 2019:

“In 2015, when the case reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, Ms. Harris’s prosecutors defended the conviction. They pointed out that Mr. Gage, while forced to act as his own lawyer, had not properly raised the legal issue in the lower court, as the law required.

The appellate judges acknowledged this impediment and sent the case to mediation, a clear signal for Ms. Harris to dismiss the case. When she refused to budge, the court upheld the conviction on that technicality. Mr. Gage is still in prison serving a 70-year sentence.”


In 2018, a civil jury in California found that police and prosecutors working under then-San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris had deliberately fabricated evidence and failed to disclose exculpatory material in the malicious prosecution of Jamal Trulove, for the shooting murder of his friend Seu Kuka.

Carla Bell at the Miami Herald writes:

“For years, AKA Harris has delivered a ruthless brand of “service.” Under Harris, the New York Times recounted, prosecutors “unlawfully held back potentially exculpatory evidence” in the case of George Gage, resulting in a 70-year sentence at San Quentin on charges of sexual abuse. Those charges were later proven false and dismissed by the trial judge, but upheld under appeal on technicality. Because Harris declined to withdraw prosecution, Gage, now 80 and partially blind, remains incarcerated, still, 20 years later.”

In February 2010 29-year-old Jamal Trulove was convicted of killing 28-year-old Seu Kuka based on the testimony of a lone witness

In March 2019, Mr. Trulove was awarded a $13.1 million settlement for his wrongful prosecution and conviction. San Francisco DA Kamala Harris showed up twice at his trial. Once at his conviction, and the second at his sentencing, during which Trulove says that he looked back and they “locked eyes,” and she began laughing at him as he was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison."

Below source: NPR

Caramad Conley

The Washington Examiner wrote in September 2019 in “Five times prosecutor Kamala Harris got the wrong guy”:


“In 1992, Caramad Conley was arrested for a drive-by gang shooting that killed two men in San Francisco. After the prosecution’s key witness testified that 18-year-old Conley had privately confessed to the murder, Conley was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Although the witness denied under oath that he had been compensated as part of the case, a subsequent investigation found that a detective had paid the witness. ... He later received a $3.5 million settlement from the city for wrongful conviction.

 

[munkle]

In the one case I read the conviction was upheld so evidently no suppression of evidence was found.
A prosecutor relies on the evidence collected by investigators and when new evidence comes up cases are reviewed.

Which case are you talking about?

 

[KingLeo]

Which case are you talking about?

George Gage conviction was upheld by the US Court of Appeals

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

Suppression of evidence is not an error. it is active criminal behavior. I have never seen more disgusing apologetics for knowingly putting innocent Black men in jail.

And your evidence that Ms Harris was actually involved in that suppression of evidence is - what?

Oh, I know, someone told you that that was what you were required to believe.

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

Yeah, but Willie Brown endorses Kamala. She was a good lay, and deserves everything she can get. Mrs. Willie Brown couldn't be contacted for comment.

The voice of yet another person who believes that no woman ever actually achieves anything on their own and that the only way that they advance in society is by sleeping their way to the top is heard from.

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

In the one case I read the conviction was upheld so evidently no suppression of evidence was found.
A prosecutor relies on the evidence collected by investigators and when new evidence comes up cases are reviewed.

The fact that a conviction is upheld is NOT actual evidence that the convicted person actually committed the crime.

Texas is about to execute a person pursuant to a conviction based on a "Forensic Theory" which has been totally debunked and which conviction was based on the "expert evidence" of someone whose evidence essentially consisted of "Well, other courts have accepted me as an expert in this field and I say that ...".