• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Presidentr Condemns Alt-Left

What a stupid flip-flopper Trump is.

First it was "many sides." Then he actually condemned the violent racists. Now we're back to "both sides do it."
 
Phys251 said:
What a stupid flip-flopper Trump is.

First it was "many sides." Then he actually condemned the violent racists. Now we're back to "both sides do it."
Click to expand...

He was forced to make yesterdays comments by Republicans who would not pass his agenda if he did not mention those hate groups by name. It angered his "base" so now he is walking it back. He feels he needs the alt right on his side as his approval numbers continue to fall. He likes anyone who supports him no matter how ugly their rhetoric .
 
iguanaman said:
He was forced to make yesterdays comments by Republicans who would not pass his agenda if he did not mention those hate groups by name. It angered his "base" so now he is walking it back. He feels he needs the alt right on his side as his approval numbers continue to fall. He like anyone who supports him no matter how ugly their rhetoric.
Click to expand...

As a narcissist, Trump has a pathological need for everyone to like him. Trouble is, even when he panders to his base, the Republicans are not a monolithic group. Even some of them understand that overt racism is a bad thing. So when he says something to pander to one part of that group on this crucial issue of racism, he's going to piss others of them off. So have fun trying to make a basic moral decision that even a third-grader could make, Mr. President!
 
DamnYankee said:
I posted yesterday, the left wouldn't be happy no matter who, what DJT condemned. Seems I was right. ROTFLMAO
Click to expand...

This is the truth. Donal trump could start passing every piece of liberal dog **** he wants...they would still condemn him because they are just as bad of blind sheep as the moronic republicans who actually voted for his dumb ass.

Wait.


What?




The crowd is not the sum of its parts.

I am a republican who did not vote for Trump (Or Hillary).
Click to expand...
 
Phys251 said:
What a stupid flip-flopper Trump is.

First it was "many sides." Then he actually condemned the violent racists. Now we're back to "both sides do it."
Click to expand...

Why should antifa be excused from their violence?
 
phattonez said:
Why should antifa be excused from their violence?
Click to expand...

A racist white male was the murderer in Charlottesville last Saturday. Can you condemn him unequivocally, or is that too much for you to do, too?
 
blackjack50 said:
This is the truth. Donal trump could start passing every piece of liberal dog **** he wants...they would still condemn him because they are just as bad of blind sheep as the moronic republicans who actually voted for his dumb ass.

Wait.


What?
Click to expand...

Who else would have you voted for?
 
Phys251 said:
A racist white male was the murderer in Charlottesville last Saturday. Can you condemn him unequivocally, or is that too much for you to do, too?
Click to expand...

I cannot, as his vehicle was being attacked before the collision.
 
phattonez said:
I cannot, as his vehicle was being attacked before the collision.
Click to expand...

Oh, dear. Since there's no credible evidence of any real threat to him once he was in his car, and he has a history of violence and supporting Nazi views, your false narrative is really on the skids.
 
Its not in dispute that both the alt-right and alt-left were there spoiling for a fight. They both came with weapons. I don't see whats so controversial about what Trump is saying other than whatever he says will be met with goat screams from the unhinged left.

 
The alt-left is a figment of Bannon's and Breitbart's imagination ...
 
Phys251 said:
As a narcissist, Trump has a pathological need for everyone to like him. Trouble is, even when he panders to his base, the Republicans are not a monolithic group. Even some of them understand that overt racism is a bad thing. So when he says something to pander to one part of that group on this crucial issue of racism, he's going to piss others of them off. So have fun trying to make a basic moral decision that even a third-grader could make, Mr. President!
Click to expand...

As I see it as an election geek, GOP lawmakers are most concerned about how trump's views will negatively affect them in their next elections ...
 
DamnYankee said:
DJT blames both sides for the violence in Charlottesville.

He's right now, he was right the other day. Both sides are equally to blame.

'Alt-left' charged at 'alt-right,' Trump says, again placing blame for Charlottesville violence 'on both sides' - LA Times
Click to expand...

And what would it take for there to be unequal blame? A murder?

If Trump treated each equally then why did he rant about the left having bats when the right had assault rifles?

If Trump treated each equally why did he lie and say only one side was protesting legally?
 
Last edited:
DamnYankee said:
I posted yesterday, the left wouldn't be happy no matter who, what DJT condemned. Seems I was right. ROTFLMAO
Click to expand...

Seems even the alt-right didn't believe in the sincerity of Trump's words.

"He sounded like a Sunday school teacher. I just don’t take him seriously. It sounded so hollow and vapid." - Richard Spencer
 
Apparently, this was John Kelly during Trump's Q&A:

kelly.webp
 
Phys251 said:
Then you are enabling racism.
Click to expand...

How do you know what his motivation was? You can tell all of that just from a video where a car under attack runs into people?

You lie.
Click to expand...
I posted clear video evidence of his vehicle being bashed in the tail lights prior to the collision.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Oh, dear. Since there's no credible evidence of any real threat to him once he was in his car, and he has a history of violence and supporting Nazi views, your false narrative is really on the skids.
Click to expand...

Video of his tail lights being bashed in prior to the collision isn't credible evidence of any real threat to him?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom