- Joined
- Jun 16, 2014
- Messages
- 14,499
- Reaction score
- 3,066
- Location
- UP of Michigan
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
-
This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
Prehistoric Mega Structure Discovered in Montana Could be the Oldest in America (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Exquisitor
- Start date
- Joined
- May 6, 2013
- Messages
- 65,223
- Reaction score
- 55,905
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Is that picture supposed to be in Montana?
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2014
- Messages
- 14,499
- Reaction score
- 3,066
- Location
- UP of Michigan
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
- Joined
- May 6, 2013
- Messages
- 65,223
- Reaction score
- 55,905
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
The people who built that wall were sedentary, civilised. Civilised meaning city.
I don't buy it. Building huge structures out of stone? In Montana? There's something wrong with this.
medi
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2023
- Messages
- 2,489
- Reaction score
- 929
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Seems that somebody at Wikipedia has a view that it is not a human built thingy:
en.wikipedia.org
PLUS, that thing about it being discovered in 1996 seems sort of odd. I mean, aren't we supposed to have mapped the Earth in many ways and something like that has only recently been "discovered"? Smells like a super mega-scam! We humans are good at that, too. Hundred bucks to go and see that bunch of rock. Not a scam?
EDIT: Well, I look at "mega structure" as implying actually human built. BUT if mega structure refers to any large thing, Earth is a mega structure. You want smaller? Mt. Fuji is a mega structure, and Mother Nature is still working on that one.
Sage Wall - Wikipedia
PLUS, that thing about it being discovered in 1996 seems sort of odd. I mean, aren't we supposed to have mapped the Earth in many ways and something like that has only recently been "discovered"? Smells like a super mega-scam! We humans are good at that, too. Hundred bucks to go and see that bunch of rock. Not a scam?
EDIT: Well, I look at "mega structure" as implying actually human built. BUT if mega structure refers to any large thing, Earth is a mega structure. You want smaller? Mt. Fuji is a mega structure, and Mother Nature is still working on that one.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2014
- Messages
- 14,499
- Reaction score
- 3,066
- Location
- UP of Michigan
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Wikipedia tells us the formation is 75 million years old, the other picture is obviously something else, fake news, clickbait, I don't know, hard to say.
Anybody?
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2011
- Messages
- 10,515
- Reaction score
- 14,701
- Location
- US
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Found this which (I guess) describes it well, lots of comparisons.
Learn something new every day. Thanks for sharing.
Learn something new every day. Thanks for sharing.