- Joined
- Dec 27, 2014
- Messages
- 59,432
- Reaction score
- 39,011
- Location
- Best Coast Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Nope.Did you read the part that says it wasn't her first offense. That's what repeatedly means, just for the record
Yup.
[link removed[/url]
I was kidding - no way I am going there!
Nope.
You have used many and repeatedly. Please provide the definitions of each with links.
Your own link noted it. She deserved to lose he r position as shift manager at the very least. Asking her to repay the loss, for which she was partially responsible, was more than fair
You already did yourself, despite lying about what I saidNope again- Show the beef Bucky.
You already did yourself, despite lying about what I said
Lying, quite the accusation. They seem to fly freely from you.
Where was I lying?
Nope.
You have used many and repeatedly. Please provide the definitions of each with links.
What a load of horsecrap.
Please.. the store has insurance I am sure. One of my stores was robbed.. my insurance covered it. End of story...
200 in a till on a busy day? Not unlikely at all...
And by the way,.. it wasn't her incompetence that cost the store money.. it was the greed and unlawful behavior of the criminal.
You want to talk incompetence? Someone should fire the crap out any manager that would say that to an employee after a robbery. Moron... not only the bad publicity.. but now the liability of employees thinking they have to stop a robbery so they don't have to pay the money back?
DUMB DUMB DUMB...
Depends on the insurance deductible
One of the ways to get out of poverty is to speak proper English, which makes a good impression in a job interview.
The cost increased by the incompetence of the employeeNot relevant - it is a cost of doing business.
Where did I say many?
She repeatedly violated the store policy which cost the store to lose money. An argument could be made that she should only have to pay the difference between what she was supposed to have in the drawer and the $400
Did you read the part that says it wasn't her first offense. That's what repeatedly means, just for the record
You already did yourself, despite lying about what I said
Sometimes grammar changes. The use of double negatives doesn'tNothing is more irritating than people using poor grammar while complaining of others' grammar deficiencies. One should always set off non-essential clauses with a comma and end complete sentences with a period. Do you have a job? Because, obviously, it's not "grammarian."
You provided the link that proved it. Thanks for that, by the wayMy error- Repeatedly was repeatedly used by yourself. Yet no proof, just assumption by you.
Please define repeatedly as you are clearly well educated.
You admitted it, now you deny it? Hard to keep up with liberal thoughtNow, as to my lying, where did I lie?
You provided the link that proved it. Thanks for that, by the way
You admitted it, now you deny it? Hard to keep up with liberal thought
Nope, I was in error on many, not repeatedly. Show the proof that she was repeatedly in violation of policy. And the definition Bucky.Nope.
You have used many and repeatedly. Please provide the definitions of each with links.
You showed it. Do you not read your own links?Nope, I was in error on many, not repeatedly. Show the proof that she was repeatedly in violation of policy. And the definition Bucky.
You stated that, shall we say repeatedly.
You showed it. Do you not read your own links?
The cost increased by the incompetence of the employee
She was instructed to leave only a certain amount of cash in the drawer. She ignored those instructions which means the robber got more cash than he would have had she followed her instructions. so there's no maybe about itMaybe, maybe not.
It depends on the company policy, it's enforcement, and the company's progressive corrective action process steps.
She was instructed to leave only a certain amount of cash in the drawer. She ignored those instructions which means the robber got more cash than he would have had she followed her instructions. so there's no maybe about it
Get back to me when you read the link, especially where it says this wasn't her first offenseGet back to me when you understand progressive corrective action steps.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?