• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Poor care at VA hospitals cost 1,000 veterans their lives, report says

No doubt you were every bit as outraged in the past. Honestly, to suggest this is Obama's fault is beyond silly. I'm quite sure you'll be leading the cheers for him as this gets fixed since the repairs will start on his watch.

I was unaware of the magnitude of the problem in the past. But that's irrelevant, his administration knew about this.
 
We're in a thread about him doing nothing, you need more proof of something already admitted to?

Prove your statement. And let's not go with a right wing fishwrap's opinion as proof?
 

The govt determines the system, so yes it is to blame. And even those nations with single payer often have supplemental insurance.

This is what top down medicine gets us-dead Americans.
 

Im inclined to agree. Its going to be quite expensive, with a large portion of the average Americans paycheck retained each month to pay for this. The standard of care will drop. There wont be a desire to provide quality care or to keep the customer satisfied (as we see with the VA now).

People want a freebie and dont realize how its going to hurt them.

1000 vets dead because of the govt. That would be just the first of millions under socialized medicine.
 
Imagine the headlines if a private insurance company withheld care resulting in the deaths of over a 1000 people. Think it would get coverage?
 

How about us "lazy" retired people, should we use Social Security?
 
The govt determines the system, so yes it is to blame. And even those nations with single payer often have supplemental insurance.

This is what top down medicine gets us-dead Americans.

Our own medical system leads to dead Americans, as I've shown in the first thing I posted.
 
What difference at this point does it make?
 
Imagine the headlines if a private insurance company withheld care resulting in the deaths of over a 1000 people. Think it would get coverage?

They do it all the time. Heck, that was big news with HMOs not too long ago and they operated for decades like that. Insurance companies still do this. Or do you not remember the movie John Q? That certainly wasn't government run healthcare doing that. Do you think they pulled the basis for that movie out of nowhere.

HMO Refuses To Pay For Life Saving Surgery | Consumer Watchdog

The story of the little girl who was attacked by dogs (the KFC thing that may or may not be a hoax) says that they were trying to raise money for her because their insurance company was refusing to pay for food for the feeding tube.

Insurance companies refuse to pay medical bills of Old Bridge woman injured in wrong-way crash | NJ.com

Do you need more? It happens all the time. They simply aren't as scrutinized as the government system is.
 

What a poor answer.

Thank you for your service.

The VA is the perfect example not of political failing as much as it is a prime example of the systemic ineptitude of bureaucratic bloat. It's not that the political parties failed as much as this is what HAPPENS when faceless drones, unaccountable to the people or their actual performance, make the decisions. The VA has been a political football for years in the public, and behind the closed doors of government it's become a mess of personal profit and gain.
 


Show me where they SYSTEMICALLY DENIED CARE TO THOUSANDS RESULTING IN DEATHS. You can't.

And btw, the private sector is much more regulated and scrutinized compared to govt healthcare.
 


Show me where they SYSTEMICALLY DENIED CARE TO THOUSANDS RESULTING IN DEATHS. You can't.

And btw, the private sector is much more regulated and scrutinized compared to govt healthcare.
 
Medicine in and of itself has inherent risks. Those dont include putting war veterans on secret "die" lists. That was the govt, NOT medicine.

That was idiots within a bureaucratic system which had rules that they could not meet so human nature kicked in and made them do something insanely stupid. The same thing can happen within private medicine.
 
Show me where they SYSTEMICALLY DENIED CARE TO THOUSANDS RESULTING IN DEATHS. You can't.

And btw, the private sector is much more regulated and scrutinized compared to govt healthcare.

I already have.

First of all, you have 1000 deaths (according to a right wing biased publication) over a 10 year period. There are 26x more deaths than that caused annually by people simply not having insurance.

No, the private sector isn't, especially not when it comes to insurance and what they will or won't pay for.
 

Some of this depends upon the veteran's enlistment agreement. My enlistment agreement guarantees me medical care from a CBOC clinic, as well as medical and hospitalization, I also have medicare A, but VA doctors will not set foot in a private hospital, so I'm fully VA.
 

That's pretty much why I said most vets. The majority of vets will only qualify for VA medical care for very specific, minor issues that get them no money for that. Some won't qualify for any VA medical services at all. The older a vet gets, the more likely they are to be able to qualify for more services, but that also requires usually putting in for those additional things each time.
 
How about us "lazy" retired people, should we use Social Security?

Retirees are not lazy. As to Social Security, that depends on whether you ever had a job where you paid into it. If you did, you should get it, you paid for it. If not, then, no. Same with Medicare.

There is a huge difference between people who have worked their whole life and have had to pay for social security and medicare their whole lives and able bodied people who choose to leach off the rest of us instead of working, aka, the lazy people I referred to. I am also referring to those who "work" at places like Walmart, etc and expect high pay and full benefits for entry level labor or unskilled labor but they never actually work at bettering themselves and trying to improve their standing.
 

Your counting raw numbers not percentages. Also, the really big difference between the two groups you mention are that veterans sacrificed a whole hell of a lot and worked very hard for that care. How many of the uninsured would have insurance if they actually worked, worked at something other than unskilled labor or took education opportunities to get better jobs?

How many more could have insurance if we quit mandating carrying the dead weight?
 

And you expect the government to honor that agreement? America has about as good a record of honoring it's agreements with it's veterans as it has honoring treaties with the Native Americans.
 
And you expect the government to honor that agreement? America has about as good a record of honoring it's agreements with it's veterans as it has honoring treaties with the Native Americans.

Yes I do.
 

Im sorry, you seem to think that saying "look over there!" is an acceptable answer. It is not.
 

Yes, we do. However, we deserve more than being used by either side as a political talking piece.

There is no more information available besides those raw numbers. Over the last 10 years, there are 21.2 million vets as of 2012. That would be .004% of vets died. The population of the US in 2012 was around 310M. That would mean that at 26000 people per year for 10 years, .08% of the population died from being uninsured. That means even percentage wise, less vets died waiting on a VA appointment than those who died because they aren't insured, many because it is just plain too expensive, despite them having jobs.

Education does not provide better jobs automatically, despite some beliefs. You need experience, and that means working low wage crap jobs to get that experience. Many of those uninsured are the vets, since, if they had other insurance, they wouldn't need to rely fully on the VA for their care. And education takes time. It takes a couple of years to get even just an associates, which isn't going to get you a decent job by itself. Plus, if a person has health problems to begin with, then they are going to be limited on what jobs they can do.

Many of those vets are part of the "uninsured" because they can't get decent jobs and neither party wants to give vets lifetime insurance without 20 years of service. So instead they offer them VA benefits for anything that can be connected to the service, and that's it for most. We wouldn't have had this problem if they had either a) insurance rather than relying on the VA or b) UHC, since then they could simply get an appointment locally to them. My husband and I were talking about it yesterday. If they really wanted to fix the system, they could simply put all vets, no matter their years of service on TriCare (use years of service and/or means testing to determine who gets what kind), which could divert funding for those who determine who is eligible for what when it comes to VA medicine and service connected disabilities, and open up VA hospitals as priority treatments centers for vets and military, just as military hospitals and centers are open now. This also allows for the option of having a local PCM rather than having to go to those VA or military facilities.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…