l see .but they dont marry,they just have sex .no man over 18 must be convicted because he had sex with a 17 years old girl
she seems mature enough to have sex with everybody
am l wrong *
arent they?*
It depends on the age of consent laws. In many countries the 20 year old man would have done nothing wrong.
yes ,laws can change as in polygamy..thats what l mean..
no ,l am just hittin many of you with your own " consent" arguments
WHAT is your point? Yes, 17 is a legal of age of consent in many states for sex AND marriage. So WHAT is your point?
yes ,laws can change as in polygamy..thats what l mean..
You're doing no such thing, seeing as everyone was talking about consent between A D U L T S. You're the one who started bringing underage kids into the equation. Why did you do that?
You're doing no such thing, seeing as everyone was talking about consent between A D U L T S. You're the one who started bringing underage kids into the equation. Why did you do that?
it is still not legal in many of them..
,if you still dont want to see my point ,l cant do anything else...........
NO they can't. The laws about age of consent do NOT need to be changed. Again, for the UMPTEENTH time, no one is talking about marrying CHILDREN who are not of legal age.
We are talking about ADULTS making an informed decision about the type of relationship that they want to have with another which is really none of your business.
so dont try to change it for polygamy either,
WHAT is your point? Yes, 17 is a legal of age of consent in many states for sex AND marriage. So WHAT is your point?
this is your post..
what is the fault of those people who dont live in those states ?
why dont you want it to be applied in every state ?
many girls over 18 are consent to have sex with men over 18
who are you to prevent them from having sex with them ?
according to your consent logic .))
it is still not legal in many of them..
,if you still dont want to see my point ,l cant do anything else...........
l see .but they dont marry,they just have sex .no man over 18 must be convicted because he had sex with a 17 years old girl
she seems mature enough to have sex with everybody
am l wrong *
arent they?*
so dont try to change it for polygamy either,
WHAT is your point? Yes, 17 is a legal of age of consent in many states for sex AND marriage. So WHAT is your point?
this is your post..
what is the fault of those people who dont live in those states ?
why dont you want it to be applied in every state ?
You aren't making any points. That's the problem. You keep repeating about age of consent, when NOBODY suggested lowering it. I like you as a person and I'm sorry, but you're argument is completely ridiculous and NOT convincing.
Maybe she has an unnatural interest.
Again, this has NOTHING to do with your OP topic. :roll: Good God! The only person talking about age of consent and pedophilia is YOU.
Um, NO, and now YOU are being dishonest.
consent is your own arguments
not mine.......
Oh, behave. :lol:
why ?
because l dont want any man over 18 to be convicted from pedophilia because he had sex with a girl age of 17
is it honest ??,
do you think she was not consent??
I have absolutely NO idea what you are talking about. My argument has NOTHING to do with what you are talking about.
Your original OP was about polygamy and NOT about age of consent. You are the one who won't stop talking about children. The rest of us are talking about adults.
consent is your own arguments
not mine.......
If you are going to LIE about me and attribute quotes to me dishonestly, then I want nothing further to do with you. THAT is a disgusting way to debate, intellectually dishonest and says a LOT about the kind of person you are.
he projects his own fantasies
but they can marry while 17 in some statesWhat's not legal in many of what? You have to be a bit more precise in your responses.
I will assume that you are saying that 17 years old is not the age of consent in all states. While that is true, that does absolutely NOTHING to advance your argument because you wouldn't have to worry about it then. They CANNOT marry if they are not at age of consent.
you always seem agressive..
but they can marry while 17 in some states
dont pretend to misunderstand me.
why dont you want to change the laws so that other 17 years old girls can marry *
la m not talking about marriage
but they are convicted from pedohilia although they are not pedohilie
if 4 or 5 perverts can have group sex and marry legally
you have no right to prevent two people from havign sex with each other
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?