• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Poll: Two-thirds of Americans oppose more troops in Iraq

K

KidRocks

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
1,337
Reaction score
16
Location
right here
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Don't believe President Bush and or the 'media', this is no 'surge', or 'additional troops' or whatever you it's being called, it's a damn, pure escalation of the war in Iraq, period!

So, it seems that the American people see President Bush's plan as an escalation of the war in Iraq and they don't like it one bit.

Seems the American people remember LBJ and Nixon and their escalations of the war in Vietnam.









Poll: Two-thirds of Americans oppose more troops in Iraq - CNN.com

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Two out of three Americans oppose President Bush's plan to send more troops to Iraq, a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll released Friday indicates.

Nearly two-thirds of those polled also say Bush has no clear plan for Iraq...
 
Too bad you and those 2/3 Americans aren't the Commander-in-Chief. Your jealousy is out of control. :lol:
 
Im from the uk i dont Americans to forget we sent are troops in too under American leadership we have lost are servicemen as a result of the bush administrations incompitence my blame falls squarly with them not the American people,soldiers or generals.

Im only 21 some of my friends from school are fighting in Iraq 2 of them close friends.I saw one of them who had come home for christmas he didnt complain but he had friends in his unit die and i could see how it had made him down.When bush makes comments like "mistakes have been made" it just seems to shrug it off. It hasnt been a few mistake its been mistake after mistake after mistake from begining to the people sent to reconstruct to today just its unbelievable I dont think there has been an Administration in the last dont know when that would of done a worse job.
 
CurrentAffairs said:
Too bad you and those 2/3 Americans aren't the Commander-in-Chief. Your jealousy is out of control. :lol:
Click to expand...


Sadly, this is not about President Bush as you seem to savor, it's about more of our troops being put in harms way by the escalation of the war in Iraq.
 
KidRocks said:
Sadly, this is not about President Bush as you seem to savor, it's about more of our troops being put in harms way by the escalation of the war in Iraq.
Click to expand...
:lol: Well if not President Bush, then who puts them in harm's way? Duh! :doh
 
KidRocks said:
EXACTLY! :roll:
Click to expand...
so then, how is this thread NOT about Bush, as you say?



CA <----------Takes his Dramamine. Suspects we will go around in circles on this.
 
CurrentAffairs said:
Too bad you and those 2/3 Americans aren't the Commander-in-Chief. Your jealousy is out of control. :lol:
Click to expand...

So in other words we have an activist President that doesn't care about what the people think. Cute. Remember that in 2008.

Republicans: the voice against the people.
 
So in other words we have an activist President that doesn't care about what the people think. Cute. Remember that in 2008.
Click to expand...
Well a lot of people remembered that in 2004...it’s just we let Diebold make our voting machines.
 
TheNextEra said:
So in other words we have an activist President that doesn't care about what the people think. Cute. Remember that in 2008.

Republicans: the voice against the people.
Click to expand...
You make it sound so simple.

I care when my children want to play outside after dark, but I am their dad and they only have one dad and I am the one who makes the decision for them.

Of course the President cares what people think. But he is the only Commander-in-Chief. Not you. Not me. He alone makes the decision.

My guess is that many people objected to the decision of Harry Truman to drop the bomb. Although he cared about what people thought, he still was the only one who could make that decision. Based on Truman's decision, does that mean one could write: Democrats: the voice against the people?
 
He alone makes the decision.
Click to expand...
Not really...we have a whole congress who is going to need to approve his decision...
 
I don't know why me or none of my friends are ever asked to participate in these left wing media polls...........
 
I oppose more troops being sent, also. Will sending more troops somehow make it more likely we will win this so called war on terror? I think not.

Bushie hasn't even given these troops a time limit - these soldiers have been, or will be, stuck in Iraq for possibly months or years to come, with no word of when they might expect to return home. Bush should at least give the troops a time frame.
 
[/QUOTE]

Americans are not the children of the President. He is not the "decider" and if something isn't in the interests of the American people he shouldn't be doing it. That's a big reason why democracy is used, to serve the interests of the people.


Actually most people supported dropping the bomb, so Truman was doing what the people wanted.

A Gallup poll in August 1945 found that 85 percent of respondents (who knew nothing about the radiation effects of the atomic bomb) endorsed its use against Japanese cities.

Japan Focus
Click to expand...
 
The below is a question asked by someone on another Blog, I am unable to fault his reasoning, perhaps (TOT and or NP) preferably without any name calling (which neither proves nor disproves any argument) and (adds nothing to any discussion) may choose to answer.
Link
Andrew Sullivan | The Daily Dish

Quote start:
I need an explanation. The common argument for why we "cannot lose" in Iraq, is that it will result in a breeding ground for terrorists (specifically Al-Qaeda) in Iraq - much like Afghanistan was (is?). But doesn't this assumption rely on the same misunderstanding that haunted Congressman Reyes, that there is a significant difference between Shiite and Sunni. If we leave Iraq, I suspect the civil war would escalate. Who would win? Almost certainly the Shiite majority. Why would the Shiites then allow Sunni terrorists such as Al-Qaeda to set up shop there? I don't see why they would. So the result would seem to be a Shiite state and no large-scale Sunni terrorist activity (certinaly none focussed on the US).

I recognize the problems of a possible genocide against the Sunnis and of an Iranian puppet state. But those problems are wholly different than the argument made by Bush and his supporters that leaving would result in an Al-Qaeda breeding ground.

Where am I wrong?
Quote ends.

Please answer without bringing rancour into the discussion.
Thank you.
 
He is not the "decider" and if something isn't in the interests of the American people he shouldn't be doing it. [/QUOTE]On issues of our military, yes, he is the decider. He decides and he determines if it is in the best interest. Study harder.
 
Navy Pride said:
Yeah but why do they only poll lefties like you?
Click to expand...

They don't, they poll people on the right as well. Hence why most of your congress got overturned in the elections.

The people have spoken and they have said they do not approve of what Bush nor the 109th Congress were doing.

Wanna watch a sinking ship? Watch all these Republican "hopefulls" for 2008 distancing themselves from Bush so they can get elected.
 
saggyjones said:
Americans are not the children of the President. He is not the "decider" and if something isn't in the interests of the American people he shouldn't be doing it. That's a big reason why democracy is used, to serve the interests of the people.
Click to expand...
and if you actually had a clue
you would realize that in a democracy we ELECT LEADERS to do what they think is best
otherwise all our country would have to do is have a poll for every issue, and there would be no need to have politicians at all. AKA mob rule

Presidents in particular, but any politician, who takes positions based on the latest poll results are useless scumbags
 
CurrentAffairs said:
He is not the "decider" and if something isn't in the interests of the American people he shouldn't be doing it. On issues of our military, yes, he is the decider. He decides and he determines if it is in the best interest. Study harder.
Click to expand...

So he is....but at the same time he isn't the decider? What? Ok time to grab a beer and watch this one unfold.:mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
wrong as usual
in 2006 MOST OF THE CONGRESS was NOT overturned
Republicans lost seats in the house and congress
but the majority of incumbents retained their seats
 
Yes in mein fuhrer we trust
 
DeeJayH said:
wrong as usual
Click to expand...

Well then if I am wrong all the Republican hopefulls for 2008 will be stating that they are in full agreement with what Bush has done with Iraq, the economy, and foreign policy. Yeah right. The rats will be leaving the sinking ship come 2008.

Republicans are two faced. First they say they support Bush, then they will distance themselves because they know the people don't support his policies. Buh bye RepubliCONS.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…