Did you have a point when you entered that conversation?
The Taliban considers murder wrong too....are we disagreeing with them on that too? Even a clock is right twice a day.
As a matter of fact I did. you said;
Prove what you state is fact, that the Taliban considers murder to be wrong, especially after they've been seen on television executing people.
I love irony.
You said the Taliban doesn't believe in murder, isn't shooting people from behind murder?We dont show it on TV but we execute people. In thoses cases, we dont call it murder.
Tell me again what you are trying to prove here?
Yes, because 'likes' are so important!
I dont friend anybody and I dont care about likes but it doesnt stop me or other people from acknowledging posts they like or agree with. Nor do they have to be on 'my side' or me on theirs.
Your declaration about his reading comprehension is also silly and unfounded.
When did the Taliban have a country?
You said the Taliban doesn't believe in murder, isn't shooting people from behind murder?
I'd just like to see proof that the Taliban doesn't believe in murder, your claim.
The point;Isnt covering someone's head with a shroud and electrocuting them murder?
I never ever said they dont believe in murder. I said we recognize murder and so do they. I never said we recognize the same things as murder.
See, you really shouldnt have stepped into the conversation....you dont even have a decent point to make. Nobody cares about whatever you are attempting prove here.
Prove they don't.The Taliban considers murder wrong too....are we disagreeing with them on that too? Even a clock is right twice a day.
The point;
Prove they don't.
Why? I said they do consider murder wrong. And you called out Beau on reading comprehension?????? :doh
I'm still waiting for the protestors who were, on camera, stealing and destroying in Ferguson (so they could get justice), really get justice... When are they going to jail?
Not reading comprehension, use of certain words.
Why does the Taliban consider murder wrong, and can you prove they do?
Lursa said:The Taliban considers murder wrong too....are we disagreeing with them on that too? Even a clock is right twice a day.
Prove they don't.
Okay, we'll drop this line here then.How would I know why the Taliban considers murder wrong, I think they are nuts. And you just asked me to prove they dont.
Is there something wrong with you? Not to mention, I am not interested in this line of conversation, as you have not given me the point you are trying to make that is remotely relevant to this thread.
They're not the 'taliban' anymore. They've re-branded themselves 'ISIS' which I guess is diet terrorism.Taliban considers murder wrong? Oh, the people they beheaded and shot from behind must have been executed huh?
Source?
Otherwise it's BS.
Of course, if you suggest we start cutting burglars hands off, you could bring it up to the states.
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan, Dec. 24— The Kandahar Sport Stadium is serene these days, its dusty brown field used by neighborhood boys for pickup games of soccer. Only the barest traces remain of the gruesome punishments meted out here by the Taliban in their archaic version of Islamic justice.
A metal goalpost is pierced with two bullet holes, a reminder of the dozens of people who were tied to it over the years and then shot to death for crimes of murder, robbery and prostitution.
Taliban shoot robbers:
There you go.
Remember, you're the one who says shooting thieves is OK.
Well, you and the Taliban.
Give me some examples of the weapons and equipment you mean.
It doesn't apply? :lamo
They want to disarm cops, too.
Officer Go **** Yourself has been forced to resign, and another officer who posted on social media sites that the Ferguson protesters should all be put down like rabid dogs has been fired.
Both decisions were good decisions. Police officers do not own the community. They work FOR the community, and the community is the boss, not them. I know that tensions have been running high in Ferguson, but if you threaten to kill people, then you do not deserve to wear a badge under ANY circumstances. End of discussion....... Or is it?
Article is here.
Loser pays solve these nuisance lawsuits. Disbarring the losing lawyers might help as well.I understand what the suit is about. I just don't agree with the route they chose to take. I make no claim as to whether it is a valid suit. I do, and have, said that I don't think they will prevail, based on the limited information I know, and the circumstances upon which the police placed them under arrest, and the legal powers that the officers reportedly exercised.
I may be totally off base (it wouldn't be the first time). If so, and it turns out that I am, I will declare such openly at that time and move on.
Cops don't have automatic weapons. Hell, the site mis-identifies an M-16A1 as an M-16A2...lol!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?