- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 14,518
- Reaction score
- 3,438
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
the 10th amendment is the law of the land. when did conservatives throw that law out?
Funny as in Ha Ha? Conservatives have a right to be upset for they expect the Commander and Chief to uphold the laws of the land. And currently marijuana is classified equivalent to heroin. Either declassify it or uphold the laws. It is no secret that these new found medical dispensaries are selling weed way below street price and people are buying it and trafficking it to where it will get top dollar in states that don't want the sh*t . Where the f'k are their protections under the law?
Yes, technically, but... :lamothe 10th amendment is the law of the land. when did conservatives throw that law out?
Yes, technically, but... :lamo
I haven't lost any debate. On the cannibas lover's old and tired debate on comparing marijuana with alcohol. My response was that out of all the people that use alcohol only 15 % become intoxicated. Not everyone who drinks is looking to get drunk. The drug user on the other hand 100% of the time is looking for a high.
While the cannibas lover doesn't like focusing on the link between drug use and crime, I have shown multiple links to studies that proves there is such a link. But no matter proof I would present coming from experts in the field of drug rehabilitation, law enforcement and the medical field, of course your expertise will always be more valid. NO doubt you hold a degree in law enforcement, sociology, and a medical degree to invalidate their studies.
On the cannibas lover's old and tired debate on comparing addiction levels of legal drugs such as caffeine and nicotine being more addictive than marijuana, I never denied that only to state that marijuana is an addictive drug and that the stuff being produced today is testing much more potent than what grandpa may have smoked at Woodstock. Showing the increase in treatment centers popping up to help with the addiction of marijuana is evidence of that.
And today I would like to add another tid bit of information that many may not be aware (I know I wasn't) and that is while the cannibas lover likes to use the argument that smoking pot is much less harmful than smoking a cigarette......then why did California put a warning on medical marijuana?
Marijuana smoke is a carcinogen
http://normanswei.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/marijuanahid.pdf
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
a backhanded response, using double standards. One from the 1860's versus one measured by today's standards.the 10th amendment is the law of the land. when did conservatives throw that law out?
a backhanded response, using double standards. One from the 1860's versus one measured by today's standards.
Smoking things is harmful.
Duh.
That's why vaporizers were invented.
And golly gee, pot smokers never leave home without their vaporizors right?
You see them dragging them around all over the place.
And golly gee, pot smokers never leave home without their vaporizors right?
You see them dragging them around all over the place.
Mine is pocket sized. Looks like a walkie talkie.
There are pens now for oil that look just like electric cigarettes.
Again, your complete lack of first-hand experience leaves you looking foolish.
Your detachment from reality continues to shine.
Marijuana is illegal in 48 states, regardless of varying degrees of illegality.
Vaporizers stink quite a lot.
People prefer to not go to jail.
1 hitters can be concealed, roaches can be tossed away and even swallowed.
A big ass vaporizer is a big ass problem.
Now everyone has their own preferred method, and many would choose their method regardless.
But if legal, some would choose vaporizers and possibly even pills and etc.
People with lung or throat issues certainly would try it out. Also former cigarette smokers.
Nope haven't seen walkie talkie size gizmos accompanying potheads either. I see pipes and joints.
Even the article I posted earlier about medical marijuana in California with a sticker warning it may cause cancer, is packaged in joints.
I don't believe my lack of first hand experience leaves me looking foolish. Nope not at all. In fact it's probably my saving grace.
I believe the one who looks foolish is the one who will purposely ignore laws to get what he wants. And anyone willing to do that so freely gives more validity to the researchers and professionals that make the case of the solid link between criminals and marijuana users. After all if you are willing to freely break one law, how many more are you willing to ignore?
the 10th amendment is the law of the land. when did conservatives throw that law out?
Yes, the war on drums has to stop!I'm not seeing the direct correlation between pot and breaking laws. You've stated a couple of times that people arrested test positive for pot, unless you can show a significant difference between criminals using it and other citizens using it there is simply no metric. I would much rather the police spend their time trying to solve murders such as those in Chicago than chasing pot smokers. I agree I think the war on drums is a self propagating war and rives a wedge between the people and law enforcement.
Well actually,....I haven't lost any debate. On the cannibas lover's old and tired debate on comparing marijuana with alcohol. My response was that out of all the people that use alcohol only 15 % become intoxicated. Not everyone who drinks is looking to get drunk. The drug user on the other hand 100% of the time is looking for a high.
While the cannibas lover doesn't like focusing on the link between drug use and crime, I have shown multiple links to studies that proves there is such a link. But no matter proof I would present coming from experts in the field of drug rehabilitation, law enforcement and the medical field, of course your expertise will always be more valid. NO doubt you hold a degree in law enforcement, sociology, and a medical degree to invalidate their studies.
On the cannibas lover's old and tired debate on comparing addiction levels of legal drugs such as caffeine and nicotine being more addictive than marijuana, I never denied that only to state that marijuana is an addictive drug and that the stuff being produced today is testing much more potent than what grandpa may have smoked at Woodstock. Showing the increase in treatment centers popping up to help with the addiction of marijuana is evidence of that.
And today I would like to add another tid bit of information that many may not be aware (I know I wasn't) and that is while the cannibas lover likes to use the argument that smoking pot is much less harmful than smoking a cigarette......then why did California put a warning on medical marijuana?
Marijuana smoke is a carcinogen
http://normanswei.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/marijuanahid.pdf
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
There are many experts that disagree with you and believe pot is addictive. Many who use it regularly don't even realize they are addicted. But even at that, have you noticed how many help centers are popping up all over the country to deal with marijuana addiction? If it wasn't addictive, why would there be a need for drug rehabilitation centers specializing in it?
mentally addictive = not addictive. examples - gambling, marijuana, shopping, the internet, kittens, love, pistachios, freedom, dancing, scissor kicks
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?