- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 66,843
- Reaction score
- 30,101
- Location
- Rolesville, NC
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Actually it is, even if they aren't the one naked other women will be changing in there and may not want a man in the locker room. You don't get to dictate what someone else should be comfortable with. Fact remains they are a man in a women's locker room, and it's not an unreasonable discomfort for women to feel uncomfortable with a male in there where they may be changing.
No, you aren't. "Decency" is subjective.
Yes I am sure I am hahahah. Upset initially, yes maybe, after it was explained to her thats that. If she don't like it tough. Her bigotry doesn't get to make the rules as she found out.
Yes, just like “morality is relative”.
Solid digestive waste from a male bovine.
It's not bigotry. It's a man in the woman's locker room.
It's not bigotry. It's a man in the woman's locker room.
Which the owners of the gym allow. Don't like it, don't go back to the gym. That simple.
Morality is relative, whether you want to recognize it or not.
Yes, Planet Fitness is free to be idiotic in the extreme, and the woman is right to be upset about it. So you think this moronic policy is going to be good for business?
It is bigotry because she assumes the transgender person is dangerous or they impact safety. That is in fact bigotry.
I didn't say you claimed he was dangerous so yes you are making stuff up.
What I did say is that it is obvious you don't care about transgender people.
ALso I still have never called you a hateful bigot, but you are free to keep repeating try to make a point on it even though it never happened.
SO yes your argument is woefully lacking intellectually since you made it up. hahahaha
Yes I already know that stuff you are making up is insipid and odious tripe. Feel free to discuss what I really said though.
No, it isn't. There is no "danger" of any kind to the woman for a "man" or transgendered woman being there. A woman can look at her, stare at her, cat call her, bother her, leer at her, or anything else a "man" or transgendered woman "might" do.
It's not bigotry. It's a man in the woman's locker room.
If I feel uncomfortable I can not go in when they are in there, change at home or in a bathroom stall, change in the private changing stalls or not go to that gym.
LaylaWindu
It is bigotry because she assumes the transgender person is dangerous or they impact safety. That is in fact bigotry.
So its okay for that "creepy male pedophile" to be in the men's changing room, with young boys? Because essentially, that is what you are saying. That man could still leer at children (boys) and make them feel uncomfortable. And anyone can make anyone else feel uncomfortable, even when they don't do anything at all.
...and we are witnessing a classic tactic, Attack those that disagree with you. She disagrees with this woman so she calls her a bigot.
Not one person has made that claim that know of.
As I said before, it's a standard wrong-wing defense of any otherwise indefensible argument—just claim that any who oppose that argument are bigots, and that any opposition to the failing argument is based on bigotry.
You argue that there is no danger or issues of safety and if you do argue that there is it is bigotry...
... Ooooops, Bodi got you. :lol:
Let's see how you try to get out of this one.
That person had just as much right to be there as she did since that is a decision of Planet Fitness's and not here. Her "concerns" don't need addressed and her concerns are what is sad. Her concern was there was a man in there, her concerned was addressed when the front desk told her that they know and he is transgender. Any concerns after that are of her own invention. She has nothing to successfully sue on but I'd like to see her try. I'm sure some hateful group will back her and pay for it.
For **** sake... the term was "protecting" as in protecting her from any of the situations that I mentioned. Yes, a woman or a child can do that stuff too but if you don't understand the difference between that and a man then I don't know what to say. That being said who the **** cares because a man should not be in a woman's locker room. I don't give a flying **** about some the opinions out there that act as if changing in front of other genders is not a big deal... most people I would say think that it is a big deal and that is why they go to their respective locker rooms and not the opposite gender's locker room. If a woman does not want a man in her locker room because she feels it isn't safe that is valid because men do in fact do things that are unsafe to women. The fact that it probably will be absolutely fine is irrelevant.
I have never EVER seen a "boy" at the gym... ever.
You have repeatedly... she feels uncomfortable that a man is in the female locker room and you are calling her a bigot because of it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?