- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,077
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
1.)You have evidence other members were complaining about her? lol please provide that now because there is none.
2.)Wait, what's this? Another news report from the "Land of Make-Believe"?
Even more important, when you try to make these claims in the future, be sure you preface them with "what I wish happened, because I have ZERO evidence to support it, is..."
1.) false it was already in one of the like 10 articles linked here. Corporate sad so.
2.) See #1
3.) See #1
nice try though but when you just make up lies it doesnt work
facts win again
And yet, you can't quote it (because you're making this up, too).1.) false it was already in one of the like 10 articles linked here. Corporate sad so.
Actually, corporate told her that they felt she was behaving inappropriately to other members. I don't see anywhere in the articles you posted where it mentions members complained about her. The abcnews article has a line that states the employee told her "we've received alot of complaints about him and told him to change in a private stall".
uhm i didnt post all the articles? it may not have been in mine, I dont know which articles it was in so youll have to look again, it said she was making other members uncomfortable and there was a complaint, couldnt tell you how many besides more than one because the word was plural. The fact remains she was not given the boot because of her initial complaints to the local facility or HQ.
And yet, you can't quote it (because you're making this up, too).
You have any more lies you need me to shoot down?
If you have actual facts, please quote the relevant news stories. We'll wait.
Correct, corporate stated that they "welcome feedback", however, either she can stop complaining to other members about the policy, or she will have membership revoked.
Translation: "I have no facts, but here's a really long post where I pretend that I do"already done but PLEASE PLEASE keep trying because its hilarious watching your posts fail . . its even more telling that instead of trying to defend your already failed claims you just avoid them and now are making up stories in desperation to save face lol
You can ask me 1000 More times, your lie will never be true and unless i get bored and feel like destroying your posts even further it aint gonna happen. Im not going through about 10+ articles and 450+ posts when they were already discussed.
But incase i do get bored later at home and want more entertainment, be specific in what you are claiming and what you think i claimed and maybe ill do so.
soooo are you claiming:
she was given the boot for her initial complaints to the local facility and HQ? she in fact was not
She was not told to stop approaching other member because its making them upset, she refused and they booted her. She in fact was.
Articles > than your posts lies
facts win again
Because judging people is inherent to humanity and you do it yourself all the time... it is just easier to recognize when we judge a rapist or murderer than people on the street. I would bet money you judge gang bangers wearing their grill trying to be pimp with some ho's on their arm...
Translation: "I have no facts, but here's a really long post where I pretend that I do"
Perhaps you're confused as go what a "fact" is? You keep saying "facts win again" while failing to produce any in your posts!LMAO PLEASE dont stop, this is awesome!
if you want to be me that bad try actually using facts :shrug: very simply solution
I noticed you dodged my questions? hmmm I wonder why?
facts win again
1.)Perhaps you're confused as go what a "fact" is? You keep saying "facts win again" while failing to produce any in your posts!
2.)Are they still lost somewhere in the "like 10 articles linked here"?
3.)I expect it's more likely that we'll uncover a stockpile of WMDs in Iraq than a single fact in the articles linked herein that supports AgentJ's claim.
Perhaps you're confused as go what a "fact" is? You keep saying "facts win again" while failing to produce any in your posts!
Are they still lost somewhere in the "like 10 articles linked here"?
I expect it's more likely that we'll uncover a stockpile of WMDs in Iraq than a single fact in the articles linked herein that supports AgentJ's claim.
1.) already done in thread history
2.) yes some of the articles were
3.) failed insults wont change the fact that your claims are false.
I also see you are still dodging my questions, very telling. I wonder why, this is because if push comes to shove your know you claims can be repeatedly proved wrong.
like i mentioned. Incase i do get bored later at home and want more entertainment, be specific in what you are claiming and what you think i claimed.
soooo are you claiming:
she was given the boot for her initial complaints to the local facility and HQ? she in fact was not which is what i said
She was not told to stop approaching other member because its making them upset, she refused and they booted her. She in fact was which is what i said
Let me know when you have something relevant to discuss, thanks
Moderator's Warning: |
If the person has undergone sex reassignment surgery ("sex change operation") then her complaint wasn't valid. If not, it was - UNLESS the club made it publicly clear that their locker rooms were unisex.
Apparently she did not know she had joined a unisex nudist gym.
In my opinion, her complaint still would have been valid. Sexual reassignment surgery does not make a man into a woman or a woman into a man. It merely alters them physically.
In my opinion, her complaint still would have been valid. Sexual reassignment surgery does not make a man into a woman or a woman into a man. It merely alters them physically.
In my opinion, her complaint still would have been valid. Sexual reassignment surgery does not make a man into a woman or a woman into a man. It merely alters them physically.
Which would she fit better with if naked if she had sex reassignment surgery, men or women?
She would be a surgically altered MAN with ZERO lady parts and male chromosomes.
I probably do, but I don't call the cops every time I see one.
Hey, if you want to judge trans people quietly in your own head, be my guest. It's probably not necessary to assume they're a sexual predator though.
I bet you would if one walked into the woman's changing rooms though... right?
Last thing I would assume is that they are a sexual predator... not being one does not mean they are welcome in a female changing room though.
I wouldn't call the cops for even a guy being in the women's changing area (it isn't illegal, despite people's beliefs). I might inquire about the policy, but honestly is probably question my own judgement. Why should it matter? And what about androgynous people?
If a many who is mentally a woman is altered to become something woman-like physically (surgically and with hormone treatment), then why would you claim she isn't a woman? She is at that point both physically and mentally a woman (more or less), no?
Which would she fit better with if naked if she had sex reassignment surgery, men or women?
In my opinion....neither.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?