• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Philly Mayor: ‘You Have Some Police Officers Who Are Increasingly Afraid...."

ok. let's unconstitutionally put the ****ing cameras on the ****ing cops.

I know I'm an anarchist and all, but as long as the government is going to exist upholding the law is kind of important to me.
 
I know I'm an anarchist and all, but as long as the government is going to exist upholding the law is kind of important to me.

well, i hope that you eventually find a regulation passed by congress that is sufficiently constitutional to pass your muster. until then, this problem needs to be dealt with. there is just too much of this kind of thing happening, and it's impossible to know who is telling the truth.
 

Step up like a man on the internet, LOL. The perfect summary of a liberal.
 
Not in the mood.

Do you stalk your women like this, too?

Women? Happily married. The best part is that I've made you look like the intellectually deficient debater that you are and I didn't even have to work up a sweat. Now move along, we've got no time for those who put their cowardice on full display.
 
requiring cameras on officers creates a worse problem? how does that work?

Because you have to skirt the Constitution to do what you want, leaving that hole open for all sorts of future abuse. And that's just the first hurdle. Do you seriously believe the NSA won't have access to the daily camera take? Really? How is this different than adding a million drones to the public sector filming 24/7/365? Then there's the who's going to pay question. Federal mandates to the states will only come with insufficient startup funding. A year down the line, county and city budgets that are already stretched to the breaking will be well and truly broken. What sort of tradeoffs in policing does that create? It won't be pretty.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps that is what is needed to be done.

Btw, how do you hire for that and not run afoul of just about every anti-discrimination law on the books?
 
The fatal flaw in that logic- there just aren't enough black cops. And that isn't likely to change. what black kid would want to be a cop when he is growing up in a culture that demonizes the police?

In these last two incidents, it is rare to see any black person defend the cops or even put any blame at all on the black males involved.
 
Last edited:
Women? Happily married. The best part is that I've made you look like the intellectually deficient debater that you are and I didn't even have to work up a sweat. Now move along, we've got no time for those who put their cowardice on full display.

You've done nothing of the sort, but live in your make-believe world and go on hating all those that make your pathetic life safe and free of worry. Yet another of our nation's unapologetic leeches that bitch and produce nothing. So sad that this is where you have to simulate your sense of self worth.
 

dude, the NSA ALREADY has access to everything through cell phones. now THAT is unconstitutional.

and i don't believe for a ****ing second that OSHA or any of that **** is unconstitutional. congress can pass ****ing bills that become law when the president signs them. ****, even the founding fathers did **** that is much more unconstitutional than passing a law that says cops have to wear cameras so that there's a record of what happened at point of arrest, and to prevent cities from getting burned down because no one knows what the **** happened. i'll tell you, John Adams is damned lucky that there weren't message boards back then.
 
Sure they do...Don't kid yourself...And it's not a strawman...I didn't claim that anyone here argued that.

I haven't seen any reports of people wanting to reinstate segregation anywhere.
 
Btw, how do you hire for that and not run afoul of just about every anti-discrimination law on the books?

I don't see a problem with it. If the government and courts can segregate us into majority black districts, majority Hispanics districts and tell us that white can't represent blacks and Hispanics, heck we even have one majority Asian district why can't the police force be the same way. Only blacks can police black communities and whites white communities, Hispanics Hispanic communities and Asians Asian communities.

Call it affirmative action policing.
 
Oh, you want a report on my opinion? Wow, I had no idea you thought I was so important....

What are you talking about? The post said:

No, they want the segregation, they just don't want the man to tell them they have to.

I don't know of anyone advocating for segregation, so that's a straw man. You are making up what people want to make your opinion look better.
 

And I don't mean to imply that the fault is on the community, honestly I think it's more a 50/50 split to be honest. Because you have a lot of neighborhoods where the police won't patrol in some of these neighborhood because quite frankly, they fear for their lives. But the police have to be the one to make that first step. This relationship has to start with police making an effort in the community to get to know the individuals. What's sad is that, I don't think a cop is able to do what he needs to, especially in places like Englewood in Chicago. And that is to walk the streets and mingle. A cop does that in Englewood right now and he's a statistic by the end of the week.
 

To your first part, I do know there are some major gangs in Chicago, but I'll be the first to admit I don't know the intricacies of the day to day shootings that I'm sure someone from Chicago knows more than I. So on that point, I'll defer to you until I can do the proper research.

As far as that last comment, this sort of situation has been done on many occasions across the country. Some communities, especially ones where police aren't able to perform their duties due to budget cuts, have gone so far as to hire private security outfits to come in and help secure the area. What I'm proposing is simply giving the members of the community a more active role in defending their homes and families. Because the police clearly aren't able to handle the job.
 

These are two different issues though. I mean if you pay for a camera, you own the camera and don't have to worry about having to pay to keep that camera every year.
 
yeah, i think the cameras should be on all police officers. enough of this ****. it protects both sides, and is just a common sense solution. i don't see any reason not to do it.

Money is a big reason, especially when efficiency is taken into account. Hit the areas that see the most friction between cops and blacks, and you'll solve this issue without having to waste money.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…