- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
- Messages
- 72,131
- Reaction score
- 58,867
- Location
- NE Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Can you explain to me clearly why?Good news! This is one step closer to making sure everyone has the vaccine available to them
It has been established since the beginning that these vaccines help alleviate symptoms and reduce the infectious period. That alone is sufficient reason to get one.Can you explain to me clearly why?
The first thesis... do vaccinated people stop getting sick with COVID? No, and this is a fact, they also get sick, they also carry the disease, only according to the vaccine developers, people carry the disease in a milder form or asymptomatically.
The second thesis... do young children get sick with COVID? Yes, but the disease is overwhelmingly asymptomatic, and those cases that had more acute diseases are so insignificant compared to the flu.
There is no evidence that this vaccine spoils anyone's immunity outside of the specious reasoning you just engaged in. Its like asking "why wear a seat belt, if you might survive the car crash?"So why then should people spoil the immunity of their children? What's the point of that. Any epidemiologist will say that acquired immunity is better than a vaccine. Why vaccinate children in such cases?
Once again, any epidemiologist will tell you that acquired immunity is always better than a vaccine...There is no evidence that this vaccine spoils anyone's immunity outside of the specious reasoning you just engaged in. Its like asking "why wear a seat belt, if you might survive the car crash?"
I have read conflicting reports on whether that is true. However, one thing I am certain of acquiring natural immunity is a hell of a lot riskier than a vaccine.Once again, any epidemiologist will tell you that acquired immunity is always better than a vaccine...
That is pretty situational and it also doesn't mean that a vaccination automagically harms someone.Once again, any epidemiologist will tell you that acquired immunity is always better than a vaccine...
Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, said Monday that an early analysis showed their three-dose coronavirus vaccine regimen triggered a strong immune response in younger children, proving 80 percent effective at preventing symptomatic infections in children 6 months to 4 years old.
The results, along with other recent developments, signal that the long and frustrating wait for a vaccine for the youngest children, the last group to lack access, could be over within weeks.
Good news! This is one step closer to making sure everyone has the vaccine available to them.
If I understand it correctly, its only effective at generating an immune response, not neccesarily that this responses prevents severity. Deaths under 16 are near 0, so vaccination would only provide a tiny decrease in risk, if any.
I beleive some doctors said the risk of heart issues from the vaccine was higher.
It's May of 2022. These kinds of questions are demeaning to all thinking people. For a second grade example, please consider why we immunize against hepatitis, DTaP, polio, MMR, etc.Can you explain to me clearly why?
The first thesis... do vaccinated people stop getting sick with COVID? No, and this is a fact, they also get sick, they also carry the disease, only according to the vaccine developers, people carry the disease in a milder form or asymptomatically.
The second thesis... do young children get sick with COVID? Yes, but the disease is overwhelmingly asymptomatic, and those cases that had more acute diseases are so insignificant compared to the flu.
So why then should people spoil the immunity of their children? What's the point of that. Any epidemiologist will say that acquired immunity is better than a vaccine. Why vaccinate children in such cases?
Unequivocally false. The medical scientific consensus is that vaccination is a safer and more dependable way to build immunity than getting sick.Once again, any epidemiologist will tell you that acquired immunity is always better than a vaccine...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?