It's what it boils down to Jack.
Whistle-blowers and others inside the Trump administration have made us aware of egregious behavior by Trump.
You know Trump knows it was bad because he had to work outside of government with Rudy and 4 felons to make progress..I mean, it's obvious and we all know it.
In doing so, it triggered the House Intelligence investigation, to which the White House offered hte transcript which confirmed what Trump did.
They quickly moved to an impeachment inquiry, with what seems like a goal of maximum a few months to get articles of impeachment. That is fast. Remember Ken Starr harassed Bill for 4 years IN THE PUBLIC.
And you claim them having a rapid, largely quiet impeachment inquiry/investigation is a POLITICAL STUNT? It's in direct response to Trump's impeachable/criminal behavior, and people in and around his administration asking for this to be investigated! It's 100% Trump's fault that Trump did OBVIOUSLY bad stuff in obviously bad ways, to get himself in trouble.
Democrats are doing a fair job right now, and if they wrap it up in a few months, it will be a mercy for Trump. The trial will be where the circus begins, since Republicans have no facts to support their position, they will just try to gum up the process.
It's a shameless political stunt.
If they actually believed there was something here worthy of impeachment, they'd follow precedent and this would look similar to Nixon's or Clinton's impeachment. It would be above board and not conducted from behind a partisan iron curtain. I mean, if what Trump supposedly did is that bad, why all the shenanigans?
There's nothing to gum up; just quickly dismiss the charges.
It's what it boils down to Jack.
Whistle-blowers and others inside the Trump administration have made us aware of egregious behavior by Trump.
You know Trump knows it was bad because he had to work outside of government with Rudy and 4 felons to make progress..I mean, it's obvious and we all know it.
In doing so, it triggered the House Intelligence investigation, to which the White House offered hte transcript which confirmed what Trump did.
They quickly moved to an impeachment inquiry, with what seems like a goal of maximum a few months to get articles of impeachment. That is fast. Remember Ken Starr harassed Bill for 4 years IN THE PUBLIC.
And you claim them having a rapid, largely quiet impeachment inquiry/investigation is a POLITICAL STUNT? It's in direct response to Trump's impeachable/criminal behavior, and people in and around his administration asking for this to be investigated! It's 100% Trump's fault that Trump did OBVIOUSLY bad stuff in obviously bad ways, to get himself in trouble.
Democrats are doing a fair job right now, and if they wrap it up in a few months, it will be a mercy for Trump. The trial will be where the circus begins, since Republicans have no facts to support their position, they will just try to gum up the process.
So she's saying that they're not going to vote yet because they want to collect more evidence.Pelosi announces House won'''t vote now on whether to begin impeachment inquiry | Fox News
If there was any doubt as to what this "impeachment inquiry" really is, this announcement should erase that doubt. The House Democrats are interested in inflicting as much political damage as they can possibly get away with.
"We're here to find the truth". The truth is that statements like this are ****ing nauseating at this point, Nancy.
I agree with everything you just said except for the last sentence. The Democratic party isn't the cancer, the cancer is this idea that "the other side" must be defeated in order for a problem to be solved. Both sides are equally guilty of spreading that disease.
Republicans in the House need to understand that they are in the minority and get no say whatsoever in the impeachment process. Democrats get to decide who is called as a witness and what questions get asked. They also get to decide what gets released to the press. That means that they get to make sure that nothing exculpatory or in Trump's favor gets released.
I disagree with you both.
It's disgusting when something as non-ideological and non-partisan as cancer gets thrown into discussions like this. Use another word.
I disagree with you both.
It's disgusting when something as non-ideological and non-partisan as cancer gets thrown into discussions like this. Use another word.
Pretty neat not letting the other party participate. Bet that could catch on in the rest of the world they look to us you know. Does the person being impeached get to have a lawyer or testify on his own behalf? Seriously. Also why so secret all this behind closed doors crap.
I disagree with you both.
It's disgusting when something as non-ideological and non-partisan as cancer gets thrown into discussions like this. Use another word.
Republicans in the House need to understand that they are in the minority and get no say whatsoever in the impeachment process. Democrats get to decide who is called as a witness and what questions get asked. They also get to decide what gets released to the press. That means that they get to make sure that nothing exculpatory or in Trump's favor gets released.
Pelosi announces House won'''t vote now on whether to begin impeachment inquiry | Fox News
If there was any doubt as to what this "impeachment inquiry" really is, this announcement should erase that doubt. The House Democrats are interested in inflicting as much political damage as they can possibly get away with.
"We're here to find the truth". The truth is that statements like this are ****ing nauseating at this point, Nancy.
The 'support' for impeachment proves 2 things...idiot leftist muppets will do whatever pathetic dance they are told to do, and the rat party and media collude to pull their strings.
:lamoActually, that's exactly the opposite of what has been happening. The Democratic party and House leadership don't want to impeach Trump. Their voters are insisting on it. Can you imagine? A political party that listens to its constituents rather than one that surgically removes their brains and trains them to repeat the dumbest **** ever uttered by humans?
When the substance is completely against you, you argue process. Republicans are exclusively arguing process.
Your comment sounds very snowflakeish.
All of the above is simply :bs.
If the case against Trump was strong, Pelosi would have taken the vote for the next step; impeachment articles.
Weak sauce. Time for you to accept that your party, Nancy as leader, and Schiff, the liar and leaker leading the brigade, is as crooked as all hell.
:lamo
The idiot leftists that have been clamoring ofr Trumps impeachment have been following idiot rats like Maxine Waters for 3+ years...since before his inauguration. The Rat party and the leftist media shills have been cooing at the idiot leftists since Nov 2016...non stop.
It's a shameless political stunt.
If they actually believed there was something here worthy of impeachment, they'd follow precedent and this would look similar to Nixon's or Clinton's impeachment. It would be above board and not conducted from behind a partisan iron curtain. I mean, if what Trump supposedly did is that bad, why all the shenanigans?
It's a metaphor... and I couldn't care less if it offends you.
Not at all. Let impeachment be of, by and for Democrats. The GOP isn't welcome, so they shouldn't participate. I would however like to see Mitch McConnell become more visible and see the Senate take nonbinding votes illustrating the rigged impeachment effort. The Senate should match the House's press release derby.
Pelosi announces House won'''t vote now on whether to begin impeachment inquiry | Fox News
If there was any doubt as to what this "impeachment inquiry" really is, this announcement should erase that doubt. The House Democrats are interested in inflicting as much political damage as they can possibly get away with.
"We're here to find the truth". The truth is that statements like this are ****ing nauseating at this point, Nancy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?