Patience runs thin as Trump’s battle with Supreme Court intensifies (1 Viewer)

[bongsaway]

The GOP, the party of law and order, or so they say, however, they also say this sort of thing.

Paul Ingrassia, the White House liaison to the Department of Homeland Security, wrote on the social platform X that generations of judges “have been infected with parasitical ideology.”
“The judges in law courts today, including the majority in the nation’s Highest Court, telegraph with these decisions that they have no understanding of law and its proper function and role,” wrote Ingrassia.

Trump supporters know the law way better than these activist judges. Apparently when you rule against trump, even if he appointed you, you become an activist judge who doesn't understand the law like the folks on the right. This is the GOP of today, like it?

Patience runs thin as Trump’s battle with Supreme Court intensifies

Patience is running thin in the intensifying battle between the Supreme Court and President Trump, with the president’s allies heightening their criticisms as the justices burn midnight oil. Just before 1 a.m. Saturday, the high court temporarily blocked the administration from deporting a group...

www.yahoo.com

 

[Stealers Wheel]

It's one thing when an ordinary citizen speaks out against Trump, but when that person (or group) is a judge, well, that is beyond the pale. When justices who owe Trump their careers on the bench disagree with his actions and policies, that is simply outrageous. They were picked to rubber stamp anything the administration wants, and they are about to learn there are consequences to their insubordination. </sarcasm>

 

[Peacenik]

The GOP, the party of law and order, or so they say, however, they also say this sort of thing.

Paul Ingrassia, the White House liaison to the Department of Homeland Security, wrote on the social platform X that generations of judges “have been infected with parasitical ideology.”
“The judges in law courts today, including the majority in the nation’s Highest Court, telegraph with these decisions that they have no understanding of law and its proper function and role,” wrote Ingrassia.

Trump supporters know the law way better than these activist judges. Apparently when you rule against trump, even if he appointed you, you become an activist judge who doesn't understand the law like the folks on the right. This is the GOP of today, like it?

Patience runs thin as Trump’s battle with Supreme Court intensifies

Patience is running thin in the intensifying battle between the Supreme Court and President Trump, with the president’s allies heightening their criticisms as the justices burn midnight oil. Just before 1 a.m. Saturday, the high court temporarily blocked the administration from deporting a group...

www.yahoo.com

Total double standard.

If judges rule in favor of Donald they are 'good judges doing their job.'

If they rule against him, they are attacked and called names.

America needs to move past this stupid moronic name-calling BS.

 

[daeler]

There were a couple threads on the Trump cases here that pretty much pointed out how little people understand how the law works.

 

[Athanasius68]

Total double standard.

If judges rule in favor of Donald they are 'good judges doing their job.'

If they rule against him, they are attacked and called names.

America needs to move past this stupid moronic name-calling BS.

Funny.
When judges rule against Trump, they are 'good judges doing their job'

When judges rule in favor of Trump, they are attacked and called names.