Really, you have proof of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians. OK I ask who were these Russians and how many were there that colluded with Trump, and what did they collude to do to win the election. Simple question
I posted the proof. He asked for Russia to hack Clinton’s emails, they did it.
That's not proof, it's idiocy. Russia's hacking was already revealed BEFORE he made the HUMOROUS comment.I posted the proof. He asked for Russia to hack Clinton’s emails, they did it.
If ANYONE other than Trump had done that, they’d be in jail already.
Cooperating to commit an illegal act.
The only reason Pelosi is not going with impeachment is because she knows if the American public sees a Kavanaugh style debacle again going into the 2020, Trump will be 100% guaranteed a second term. She's playing it safe nothing more. Her partisan hate is still there, she just can't emote it until after 2020.Although he says he's skeptical about whether what Pelosi has said about not going down the road to impeachment unless the reason is compelling "represents a true shift from toxic partisanship," David French says that at least she's doing what more politicians should do, looking beyond one's one "tribe" and thinking of the larger body politic, and argues that this is a "national necessity." From his article:
This morning the New York Times’ Thomas Edsall published an important essay highlighting a new study that analyzed the extent of “lethal mass partisanship.” As Edsall observes, the paper contained some disturbing statistics. Among them, “42 percent of the people in each party view the opposition as ‘downright evil.’” A stunning 20 percent of Democrats and 16 percent of Republicans believe “we’d be better off as a country if large numbers of the opposing party in the public today just died.” And if the opposing party wins the 2020 election, 18 percent of Democrats and 13 percent of Republicans “feel violence would be justified.”
We hear quite a bit about “dehumanizing rhetoric” in American public life. Well, it appears that tens of millions of Americans now have dehumanizing beliefs. “One out of five Republicans and Democrats agree with the statement that their political adversaries ‘lack the traits to be considered fully human — they behave like animals.’”
...It’s in this atmosphere that I’m increasingly of the view that the vanishing, bipartisan class of civil libertarians represent an important ingredient in the glue that keeps America together. The fundamental idea that we should defend the rights of others that we would like to exercise ourselves often requires that we gain greater sympathetic understanding of our opponents’ points of view. After all, the defense of liberty in the public square can never be merely legalistic. To be effective it also has to humanize. Nancy Pelosi & Trump Impeachment -- Partisan Hate Is Becoming a National Crisis | National Review
If you see those with whom you disagree as "more jackal than human," then you're "justified" in the impulse to ruin their lives and livelihoods. But at what cost to the nation?
Come, let us reason together, showing respect for all and malice toward none.
That's not proof, it's idiocy. Russia's hacking was already revealed BEFORE he made the HUMOROUS comment.
No, I quoted what I meant.
That obvious denial of reality.
You believe that, you'll believe anything.
We have a video of Trump MAKING A FRIGGIN' JOKE about the incompetence of the State Department and the FBI being unable to find over 30k of Clinton's emails. Again, do you seriously think he'd seriously suborn a crime on national TV?I’ll say it again. We have video of Trump calling on a foreign power to commit an illegal act in order to gain advantage in the coming election.
This is an undeniable fact.
I am going to assume that you're aware of McConnell's vow made in 2009 on the eve of Obama's inauguration, and that you're just playing coy or playing dumb, pretending you don't know what he said.
Re Mourdock, this fits you like a glove:
“I have a mindset that says bipartisanship ought to consist of Democrats coming to the Republican point of view.”
Soledad O’Brien pressed him on his notion of compromise, saying, “In fact, the only compromise you’ll do is really getting other people on the other side of the aisle to come to your side of the aisle, which I guess is the definition against compromise...”
“Well, it is the definition of political effectiveness,” he replied.
We have a video of Trump MAKING A FRIGGIN' JOKE about the incompetence of the State Department and the FBI being unable to find over 30k of Clinton's emails. Again, do you seriously think he'd seriously suborn a crime on national TV?
That was also a jokeIt wasn’t a joke. He TOLD us. He could commit MURDER and not lose a single supporter.
Let's see a linkVidi said:He called his supporters ignorant sheep straight to their faces and they cheered him for it!
Says the person slavishly spewing the LW loony mantras.Vidi said:You’re defending his treason as a joke? Trump was right.
That was also a joke
Let's see a link
Says the person slavishly spewing the LW loony mantras.
It wasn’t a joke. He called on Russia to commit an illegal act. He TOLD us. He could commit MURDER and not lose a single supporter.
He called his supporters ignorant sheep straight to their faces and they cheered him for it!
You’re defending his treason as a joke? Trump was right. He didn’t lose a single supporter.
I’ll say it again. We have video of Trump calling on a foreign power to commit an illegal act in order to gain advantage in the coming election.
This is an undeniable fact.
Then not to worry, Trump will be going to jail, all you libs will make it happen over your video. You control the House and as you said Trump broke the law, so Adam Schiff will be on it and get Trump indicted or at the very least impeached. However why is it taking so long for them to act, it's been well over 2 yrs. Christ Trump should have at least been impeached as soon as he took office.
First let me remind you that the period I mentioned was 60's and 70's, did not mention the 50's.
Police brutality and killings have been going on for decades. So while "sinister" not something new.
As to mass shootings, some are sinister such as the church shooting. We had bombing of black churches in the period I mentioned.
I could point-counterpoint each item on your list. Bottom line is bad things happen. There are bad,crazy people in this world. To say this period is more sinister, I guess the hidden point because of our current president does not hold up IMO.
Yep, because they enjoy humor.Did Trump say he loved the poorly educated ? Ignorant
Did Trump say he could shoot someone in Times Square and not lose a single supporter? Sheep
And they cheered.
Not "anytime", he says some dumb **** seriously as well - as have most Presidents. But some of us DO have a better developed understanding of English, including the use of hyperbole, cynicism, and sarcasm.It’s amazing how anytime Trump says something completely indefensible, it was just a joke.
First, the Huffington post is mindless crap that should be in the grocery check out lane.
Second, what in the hell do I care about what Richard Mourdock says?
He's a nobody. Third, I'm not sure what in the hell you are even talking about in regards to Mitch McConnel, unless it's when he said he wanted to make Obama a one term president. That doesn't have anything to do with bipartisanship. All parties want the other party's president to be a one term president. The left are doing their best at that with Trump now. What on Earth did you want McConnell to do, donate to Obama's re-election campaign?
So, he's using the Democratic definition of compromise - so what?I am going to assume that you're aware of McConnell's vow made in 2009 on the eve of Obama's inauguration, and that you're just playing coy or playing dumb, pretending you don't know what he said.
Re Mourdock, this fits you like a glove:
“I have a mindset that says bipartisanship ought to consist of Democrats coming to the Republican point of view.”
Soledad O’Brien pressed him on his notion of compromise, saying, “In fact, the only compromise you’ll do is really getting other people on the other side of the aisle to come to your side of the aisle, which I guess is the definition against compromise...”
“Well, it is the definition of political effectiveness,” he replied.
Then not one of the people that Mueller had in his pocket wanted to save their asses.
Where is the collusion? Yes that is a question. Further you libs were 100% certain for over 2+ yrs you have a ton of proof positive evidence that Trump colluded with the Russian. Where is it? It's a question
Where is the collusion?
BS I keep asking where is the Collusion.
Christ, you don't understand a thing, I'm the one asking the question, which is! Where is the collusion, you libs have been telling the world for over 2 yrs you have proof of Trump/Russia collusion.
Here you go, your guy Adam Schiff:
The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee said Wednesday that there is now “more than circumstantial evidence” that Trump’s associates colluded with the Russians to interfere in the U.S. election.
In an interview on MSNBC’s “Meet the Press Daily,” host Chuck Todd asked if Rep. Adam Schiff, D-California, currently has a circumstantial case.
“Actually, no, Chuck. I can tell you that the case is more than that. And I can’t go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now,” Schiff said.
Adam Schiff says there's "more than circumstantial evidence" of Trump-Russia collusion - CBS News
Good luck with that one. You're going to need it.
So, he's using the Democratic definition of compromise - so what?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?