- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
the Nevada CT bent over backwards for the plaintiffs and still dismissed this suit arising from Paddock's mass shooting at Vegas a few years ago
De facto or de jure?"In December 2021, a unanimous Nevada Supreme Court determined in Parsons v. Colt’s Manufacturing Company that a Nevada statute granted gun manufacturers immunity from certain wrongful death or negligence claims asserted under state law, even if the plaintiffs plausibly allege the manufacturers knowingly sold firearms that violated state and federal machinegun laws."
What other industry has such immunity ?
What other industry has such immunity ?
"In December 2021, a unanimous Nevada Supreme Court determined in Parsons v. Colt’s Manufacturing Company that a Nevada statute granted gun manufacturers immunity from certain wrongful death or negligence claims asserted under state law, even if the plaintiffs plausibly allege the manufacturers knowingly sold firearms that violated state and federal machinegun laws."
What other industry has such immunity ?
what other industry is ever sued by leftwing scum because a criminal misuses a lawfully sold product?"In December 2021, a unanimous Nevada Supreme Court determined in Parsons v. Colt’s Manufacturing Company that a Nevada statute granted gun manufacturers immunity from certain wrongful death or negligence claims asserted under state law, even if the plaintiffs plausibly allege the manufacturers knowingly sold firearms that violated state and federal machinegun laws."
What other industry has such immunity ?
Most companies that manufacture goods are immune from the illegal use of their product. Such as automobile manufactures, cutlery manufactures, aircraft manufactures and even pencil manufactures. It isn't the manufactures fault on how their product is used and it is impossible to manufacture products that can not be use illegally. This case would set a dangerous precedent if the plaintiffs had won this, it would set a stage in this country that could possibility cripple any manufacturing company IF their product was used illegally to cause death."In December 2021, a unanimous Nevada Supreme Court determined in Parsons v. Colt’s Manufacturing Company that a Nevada statute granted gun manufacturers immunity from certain wrongful death or negligence claims asserted under state law, even if the plaintiffs plausibly allege the manufacturers knowingly sold firearms that violated state and federal machinegun laws."
What other industry has such immunity ?
De facto or de jure?
All internet communication hosting platforms. Twitter, Facebook ect. Section 230, that third parties posting on said platforms, such hosting platforms are not liable for what is posted.
The ones the liberal radicals love so much for big tech censoring conservatives?
All of them have that immunity, the problem is that gun-banners are rabid they would stop at nothing to get rid of guns that it must be codified into law.
When is the last time you heard about Louisville slugger getting sued because someone got beat with a bat?
Most companies that manufacture goods are immune from the illegal use of their product. Such as automobile manufactures, cutlery manufactures, aircraft manufactures and even pencil manufactures. It isn't the manufactures fault on how their product is used and it is impossible to manufacture products that can not be use illegally. This case would set a dangerous precedent if the plaintiffs had won this, it would set a stage in this country that could possibility cripple any manufacturing company IF their product was used illegally to cause death.
A wooden baseball bat is a club, hardly removed from the original design. A metal baseball bat is a club with improved lethality.Baseball bats are designed to play baseball with, not to kill people.
The people of Oklahoma City should have sued U-Haul for providing McVeigh with a vehicle that could be packed with enough ANFO to level a city block. After all, somebody with deep pockets needs to be liable of there's no sense in filing a case!
what other industry is ever sued by leftwing scum because a criminal misuses a lawfully sold product?
The de facto protection for other industries is that no one is trying to (a) sue them out of business (b) ban and confiscate all of their product, except for a few exemptions note previously.De jure.
Sue 'em all and let God sort 'em out!!!What about suing the coop that sold the fertilizer?
Sue 'em all and let God sort 'em out!!!
I really don't remember who got sued.You do realize their WERE lawsuits against the coop that sold the fertilizer... correct?
The de facto protection for other industries is that no one is trying to (a) sue them out of business (b) ban and confiscate all of their product, except for a few exemptions note previously.
They weren't sued for making cigarettes. They were sued for lying about cigarettes.Er...the tobacco industry ?
Didn’t they get tossed because selling fertilizer for farm use the having someone misuse it to create a bomb isn’t the producers fault. Like how if you sell a gun to someone and it gets stolen the used in a crime it’s not Colts fault.You do realize their WERE lawsuits against the coop that sold the fertilizer... correct?
They weren't sued for making cigarettes. They were sued for lying about cigarettes.
Are they being sued now? Is there a legal existential threat?
they were hit with 12(b)(6) dismissals. if courts actually imposed severe penalties against those who file frivolous lawsuits, this crap would stopYou do realize their WERE lawsuits against the coop that sold the fertilizer... correct?
they were hit with 12(b)(6) dismissals. if courts actually imposed severe penalties against those who file frivolous lawsuits, this crap would stop
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?