- Joined
- Nov 29, 2019
- Messages
- 882
- Reaction score
- 179
- Location
- USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Speaking from my own experience I remember always having a favorable opinion of the pardon power. Through the years I always took an interest who our Presidents pardoned and generally found myself in agreement. They mostly seemed well deserved, often with compelling reasons for their pardons. That is until Bill Clinton pardoned an arguably sleazy guy named Marc Rich who made a huge donation to the Clinton library prior to the pardon. This was the 1st time in my memory this kind of criminal was pardoned. After Marc Rich I looked into pardon history and couldn't find any prior examples of similar pardons EVER before. It's only gone downhill since, reaching an all time low with Biden first pardoning his son for any crime he may or may not have committed in the last 11 years and now the latest batch of pay for pardons for several truly horrible people. If you would have asked me 30 years ago if a president would ever use pardons like Biden has I would have said no way there would complete condemnation by the entire media and the overwhelming majority of the public, the Presidents legacy would be destroyed, it just wouldn't be done. How things have changed so dramatically in 30 years.
Have we seen the worst? Have we turned a corner? Will we elect more people like Biden or worst in the future? Or are we in a common sense revolution with completely different rules for future political success? It kind of feels like it to me. I'm feeling optimistic that concerns we face today about abuse of power, election integrity, lawfare, and 3rd world like political corruption may be left for the historians to argue about. I am starting to think we are witnessing the roaring twenties leading to the golden age of the 21st century. Does anyone agree?
Have we seen the worst? Have we turned a corner? Will we elect more people like Biden or worst in the future? Or are we in a common sense revolution with completely different rules for future political success? It kind of feels like it to me. I'm feeling optimistic that concerns we face today about abuse of power, election integrity, lawfare, and 3rd world like political corruption may be left for the historians to argue about. I am starting to think we are witnessing the roaring twenties leading to the golden age of the 21st century. Does anyone agree?