It is what it is. I did more than call it, I provided examples. For example it is telling that you and MG keep asking about the so called blogs that were supposedly making all these spurious charges against Palin. If you two had taken the time to actually bloody READ you would know that one such non blog source was Palin’s hometown NEWSPAPER. And that other newspapers and wire feeds across the country picked up and ran those salacious reports. And if this stuff WAS not widely reported and the topic of cable news shows and radio, just how do you two propose to have learned about all of this in the first place? You gals in the same blog coffee klatch?How did I know that you would still call anything I say about Sarah Palin irrational. :roll:
Bye bye
Um..are you kidding? Even Palin admitted that the interview didn't go good. What interview were you watching?
WTF does going to church and having kids have to do with anything?
Since when did that mean anything?
WTF does going to church and having kids have to do with anything?
Since when did that mean anything?
She wouldn't have been put in such a defensive position about the interview if the wrath of the liberal media didn't come crashing down about this interview. If liberals weren't so ****ing weird and freaked out about Palin it would have just been another interview.
OMG!!! She doesn't know what newspapers she reads! OMG!!! That's her daughter's baby!!! OMG!!! She's against abortion!!!
What was meaningful? Why all the hate for a woman that any American would immediately just like, even if there was no way they would ever vote for her?
You're acting like the reaction to Palin was somehow normal when I say it was completely bizarre. And still is.
He is using the Michael Moore approach.The guy doing this documentary is starting with a premise and working backwards from there. He is fitting things to support his claim instead of letting the evidence lead him to the conclusion.
Can you first please indicate where in this interview Palin says Katie was unfair to her? You and aps keep going on about this “unfair” point of yours despite the fact that Palin did not say anything of the sort. Hence the application of the word irrational.I wrote a whole reply to this and my browser crashed. :-(
Anyway, I'd like to know from Sarah what did Katie do in particular to be unfair to her?
If she would have answered the newspaper question as well as she did in this particular interview, then I would have come to a different conclusion. But she didn't come across well with Katie, IMO. Not because of Katie, but because of her answers. I've seen her in other interviews, with other interviewers, that produced the same old indirect generalized answers that I find unappealing.
So I'd like to know from Sarah-- in a direct manner, rather than "she thinks she's the center of the universe"--why that particular interview was misleading.
What was meaningful? Why all the hate for a woman that any American would immediately just like, even if there was no way they would ever vote for her?
You're acting like the reaction to Palin was somehow normal when I say it was completely bizarre. And still is.
He is using the Michael Moore approach.
Can you first please indicate where in this interview Palin says Katie was unfair to her? You and aps keep going on about this “unfair” point of yours despite the fact that Palin did not say anything of the sort. Hence the application of the word irrational.
As for the rest of your questions, did you actually watch and listen to the interview? Seems to me you must not have, or you would know with specificity what Palin did say and hence would not need to pose questions to already addressed answers. Christ on the cross you two seem hellbent on illustrating exactly my earlier point about the worst Palin detractors.:shock:
There was plenty of righteous criticism of Palin. Her answers sucked. She sounded slogany and downright like she was just trying to fill time with her answers.
So you now realize that she did not say Couric was unfair to her and that in fact she was quite specific with regards to what issues she did have with the Couric interview. Likewise she seems to have answered your questions and you seem not have been able to make yourself watch and listen to the interview. Which would of course answer most of the questions and points you have had in this thread.Hello, Sir Loin... that's the point of this doc, no? To show how unfair the media has been towards her. Why does she need to say it? It's automatically insinuated. She had a beef with how the media treated her, and in her words, "Katie is not the center of the universe." Hmmmmmm.
Funny how she's done a complete 180 to her viewpoint in August. I wonder if Hillary will offer up any words of advice? :2razz:
Yeah, that's kinda what Charlie Gibson and Wolf Blitzer thought also....LOLThere was plenty of righteous criticism of Palin. Her answers sucked. She sounded slogany and downright like she was just trying to fill time with her answers.
I like how she thought that if she was on the Dem ticket everything would have been different.
I wonder if she would have accused McCain of "palling around with the North Vietnamese."
All hyperbole aside, who are the "normal" Americans? I don't think "normal" Americans pontificate on political forums either way.
She is a BEAST! She is nothing but an ego-tripping media ho and she is getting what she wants with crap like this:roll:
Thanks MSM for this BEAST cause she is good for a few laughs and water cooler talk each morn:2razz:
What do you think they do, then?
Agreed, of course you are being thoughtful here! Sadly there are many at DP that find it impossible to act that way when Palin is mentioned. It is more than fair to call it Palin Derangement Syndrome IMO. :roll:
Of course you assume. So what does that have to do with anything important? The documentary is not even out yet so thoughtful minds will wait until it is to judge it. I do note you are not amongst that crowd.:roll:LOL... are you kidding? That clip, and I assume the entire documentary based on the clip, is so hypocritical it's sick! I can't believe she complains about the exact garbage she and McCain pulled during the election.
Of course you assume. So what does that have to do with anything important? The documentary is not even out yet so thoughtful minds will wait until it is to judge it. I do note you are not amongst that crowd.:roll:
Yeah it is an ad hom to note you assume. So you are interested in useful comments? GREAT! You can start being useful by detailing how the interview is "so hypocritical it's sick" and move along to your really important points. Or you can try to press your ad hom tack, you'll find me taped up and ready to spar. Let us hope you are better at this than aps or MG and wise enough not to illustrate the absurdity of your argument by making your signature about it. Despite the contextual inaccuracies therein. By all means, get on with your bad self!:boxerI said I assume based on the clip. Which means my assumption could change once the docu. comes out. Did you have anything useful to say or are you simply satisfied making ad homs?
"Bored, anonymous, pathetic bloggers who lie annoy me….I'll tell you, yesterday the Anchorage Daily News, they called again to ask — double-, triple-, quadruple-check — who is Trig's real mom,” she said, in an interview to be published in the magazine’s March issue. . . .
The former Republican vice presidential candidate said again she regretted not taking a greater leadership role during the campaign season. "If I were giving advice to myself back on the day my candidacy was announced, I'd say, Tell the campaign that you'll be callin' some of the shots,” she said. “Don't just assume that they know you well enough to make all your decisions for ya. Let them know that you're the CEO of a state, you're forty-four years old, you've got a lot of great life experience that can be put to good use as a candidate."
CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - Palin slams ‘bored, anonymous, pathetic bloggers who lie’ « - Blogs from CNN.com
I'm sorry, but can you imagine any Vice President making comments like this? There have been so many lies about George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Barack Obama, and other prominent politicians, and you don't see any of them throwing a tantrum about the lies. This woman exudes insecurity. Why is she giving anonymous bloggers so much importance? That doesn't make sense to me, but maybe because I have some confidence in myself.
Just the way she speaks--she sounds very immature and defensive. It's really sad.
I know there are rumors about her not being the mom of Trig. But if she knows better, why does she care? No one I know is still talking about this issue.
No of course you can see from the interview that she is throwing a tantrum! And aps is not irrational at all! Chuckle.I don't see where you are getting any of that analysis at all. I don't see a tantrum; I see a very candid woman who is simply answering a question.
No of course you can see from the interview that she is throwing a tantrum! And aps is not irrational at all! Chuckle.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?