• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pakistan's 'Sharia Law For Peace' Deal Privately Backed By US

bhkad

DP Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2007
Messages
10,742
Reaction score
1,754
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Pakistan's 'Sharia Law For Peace' Deal Privately Backed By US

The US is reportedly privately supporting a deal the Pakistan govt. made with the Taliban to introduce Sharia Law in the Taliban rich Swat Valley region of Northwest Pakistan.

The idea behind backing this deal is to weaken the Taliban by appeasing one of its two factions which have been joined in opposing Pakistani government forces.

Swat's Taliban faction is focused on local issues and a demand for Sharia Law. The other faction, the TTP, supports al Qaeda more actively as part of the global jihad.

American officials hope that the Sharia Law For Peace deal brings peace to that area and that by dividing the two groups there will be less resistance to anti-terrorism efforts.

US privately backs Pakistan's 'Sharia law for peace' deal with Taliban - Telegraph

But I just can't help but think about the short term tactics we've employed in the past which were supposedly the smart way of dealing with our problems at the time only to have the problem become worse in the long run.

Think about how we dealt with Iran and Afghanistan in 1979 and how they later became a different kind of problem directly due to our previous short term measures.

If the report is true, we are backing a penny smart but pound foolish plan that is probably very popular in the area but one which has all the elements needed to turn into a major problem later on.

Taliban fighters are ultimately encouraged by this development and will look to replicate the same conditions here elsewhere in the Western part of the country and once Sharia Law is introduced do not expect it to be un-introduced without major bloodshed.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said in Japan that the agreement still needed to be "thoroughly understood."

A senior U.S. Defense Department official, however, said "it is hard to view this as anything other than a negative development." He requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of relations with Pakistan and because he was not authorized to speak on the record.

NATO cautions Pakistan over truce with Taliban
 
Last edited:
I'm rather split. On the one hand I'm no liberal universalist who thinks that all gov'ts should be held to some detailed set plan, they should differ quite substantially according local custom, history and tradition. However on the other hand I do think parts of Sharia law constitute an invasion of what I'd consider basic liberties required by all that I cannot condone.
 
I'm rather split. On the one hand I'm no liberal universalist who thinks that all gov'ts should be held to some detailed set plan, they should differ quite substantially according local custom, history and tradition. However on the other hand I do think parts of Sharia law constitute an invasion of what I'd consider basic liberties required by all that I cannot condone.

Eventually we will have to draw a line at what land will be free and what land will belong to Allah.

Every land will be decided.

Until then the Obama plan seems to be to give up those regions we have no chance of defending in exchange for peace.

Smart power.

Is it smart?
 
Referring to the Pakistani govt. Charles Krauthammer says today on FNC's Special Report with Bret Baier, "they will regret the day they gave up the Swat Valley."
 
Eventually we will have to draw a line at what land will be free and what land will belong to Allah.

That the people of Asia have no laws, rights or liberty, is a doctrine that wickedly is to be disseminated through this country. I again assert every Mohammedan government is by its principles, a government of law.Edmund Burke
 
Back
Top Bottom