- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
- Messages
- 27,204
- Reaction score
- 13,299
- Location
- CT
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
We could argue that but it isn't what was happening.
The staff allowed interested students to stop by and pick them up.
I've seen Class yearbooks with many pages of solicitations.
A class yearbook is full of sponsoring adds. Yes, solicitation, but in add form, and they are paying sponsors, without which, no yearbook would exist. I think of that one as a kind of necessary evil.
If there was no solicitation about this location to pick up a copy of the bible, how did kids know about it? No announcements were made, no flyers, posters on the wall, no one sitting at the table handing them out, no nothing? Fact is, there was, likely, a stack of bibles sitting, visible, on a table, with a sign of SOME sort, saying "free, take one.....for your everlasting SOUL", lol. Dramatised, but you get my point.
Statistically, more and more of them, these days. How else do kids get into drugs, booze, guns, etc etc.
By stealing from the parents.
A class yearbook is full of sponsoring adds. Yes, solicitation, but in add form, and they are paying sponsors, without which, no yearbook would exist. I think of that one as a kind of necessary evil.
Sigh. Always the double standard. Pass out bibles? Then pass out wiccan, pagan, etc too.
Religion should stay OUT of schools.
The Gideons International had delivered several boxes of the sacred books to the school office. The staff allowed interested students to stop by and pick them up
Can you imagine if the school was giving out the Communist manifesto? We'd NEVER hear the end of it.
If I still had kids at home and my kid had a bible shoved in his hands, I would be VERY upset. How dare they push their religious propaganda on my child? He is a MINOR. He is in school to learn how to spell, count, read, understand science, etc etc etc. He is not there to learn some other scmucks religion. That is MY department. And HIS to seek out that which tickles his own ear. It not the school's responsibility to teach religion. Period.
The question would be: Has the school allowed local Muslim elders from the mosque drop off boxes of the Quran and allow the students to pick those up as well?
Only Muslims are supposed to touch the Quran, so it's unlikely Muslims even tried to make it available for the infidels to defile.
Buddhists aren't known for their evangelical efforts, they pretty much keep it in their temple and their home.
It's note worthy to point out that this angry woman only brought wiccan material to the school in response to being outraged, whereas the Gideons have a centuries long history of passing out free bibles to whomever is interested. Her bringing material to the school was not a bona fied effort to make information about witchcraft available, it wasn't an honest effort to display her religion on equal footing. Her intent was simply to stir the pot.
This lady needs to just chill.
So you'd have no problem if your kid brought Mein Kampf home from school and said the school was giving them away?
You don't get to decide that.
I want my kid to learn the religious beliefs I choose for him. The end. If I want him to learn about other religions, and which ones, that will be my choice only.
Only Muslims are supposed to touch the Quran, so it's unlikely Muslims even tried to make it available for the infidels to defile.
Kids have choices too.
Read that in AP History too... what a bunch of horsecrap... no wonder why our kids are so undereducated today... no one wants kids to read ANYTHING...
But more and more often parents rely on the schools to raise their kids.Um, no.
A parent controls a kid's choices.
Older kids may have more choices than younger ones, but overall, a school may not simply override a parent's choice about religious beliefs by saying it's the kid's choice. That would be an obvious violation of the establishment clause.
But more and more often parents rely on the schools to raise their kids.
So? That's no excuse.
A school may not infringe on the right of a parent to control what religious beliefs the child is exposed to.
And they tend to be one political lean.
How many times have you heard of a conservative making a stink about a nativity scene, a bible, etc? They might get up in arms if those things are NOT allowed, but surely not up in arms if they are. I guess the "Christian right" really has some punch behind it.
This nation was founded on God. Its on our money. It's in our swear-in speeches. He's in the pledge said in every public school classroom in the United States. He's there. Period.
the real reason why she's mad:
No one put the bible on her son's desk, he stopped by and picked one up. He was interested in a faith other than his mother's, and she takes offense. She thinks, wrongly, that she has failed as a parent. Furthermore she is projecting her anger stemming from this erroneous guilt onto someone else so that she doesn't have to face her failure.
And now it's on DP...here comes the **** storm!
So, calm down folks. The woman isn't a failure, the child is just curious, and the school just set set the bibles out to be picked up.
No big deal.
The article says, "The Gideons International had delivered several boxes of the sacred books to the school office. The staff allowed interested students to stop by and pick them up.
"Schools should not be giving out one religion's materials and not others," Strivelli said.
Is allowing interested students to stop by the office to pick up materials if they are interested the same as distribution?
Another question I have is which pagan spell books. The Bible (and the Qur'an) are universal texts. I'd really like to know which spell books Strivelli wished to distribute. One reason is that paganism is so eclectic. So is Wicca. Hived covens can be very small and have very particular beliefs--for examples, in fairies.
Here's a link to Strivelli's bio page with links to her three sites. I'm not interested enough to check them out, but I did note that the OP's Fox link uses the term "Witchcraft" rather than "Wicca" and that Strivelli's site uses "Magic" rather than "Magick."
They should not have been allowed by the administration of the public school to be left there for free pick up. Its wrong for a public school to allow promotion of a religion on school property.
Have you not read through this thread at all? Have you missed where the courts have ruled that this is completely legal as long as all are allowed to do the same?
I don't think anyone is arguing about that, anymore. I think the argument has steered more towards, SHOULD that be legal...
And just curious, what do you feel about it? Sorry if you already stated, I have not picked through this thread very carefully...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?