- Joined
- Mar 20, 2012
- Messages
- 22,705
- Reaction score
- 9,469
- Location
- okla-freakin-homa
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
This country is going to hell in a hand basket but it will never sink as low as you want it to. There are still a lot of God Fearing people out there who believe that the sexual act Gays indulge is and abomination.
If you're lucky, you'll end an old man, too. With much more wisdom than you have now. It is difficult for some older Americans to accept the changes they've seen in their lifetime. This somehow surprises you???? You will find the same someday. Hopefully, you will be respected and taken seriously when you object to the social change YOU are bound to see in YOUR lifetime.
And, hopefully, someone will not attempt to denigrate your thoughts by calling YOU "Old Man."
Harumpf.
if im lucky enough to make it to be an old man and my views are bigoted, racist and or misogynistic i dont deserve respect.
I have no argument with you. You didn't call him "Old Man." Move along.
dayuuuuuum
SAY PLEASE MISSY!!!!
LMAO!
They get the last say in what's legally right.
If you shoot and kill a child molester, you're still probably going to jail.
Judge Todd Baugh thought he was doing the right thing when he gave a known school rapist only 30 days in jail.
LOL what a ridiculous comparison. What's legally right can sometimes be morally wrong.
If you're lucky, you'll end an old man, too. With much more wisdom than you have now. It is difficult for some older Americans to accept the changes they've seen in their lifetime. This somehow surprises you???? You will find the same someday. Hopefully, you will be respected and taken seriously when you object to the social change YOU are bound to see in YOUR lifetime. And, hopefully, someone will not attempt to denigrate your thoughts by calling YOU "Old Man." Harumpf.
The rest of America is leaving you behind comrade. Same-Sex Marriage Support Solidifies Above 50% in U.S.What do you think they wil do about the 37 states that have constitutional amendments banning it....You got all your going to get my left wing friend....live with it.
Morality is subjective. Law is absolute. Be you conservative, centrist, or fringe-liberal like yourself, murder is murder.
When this guy issued licenses to same sex couples, he broke the law. Period. End story.
You can spin it, shed a tear, cry in outrage, or stand on a soapbox. It's still illegal.
A fringe Liberal? x] I was never contending that what he did was legal or right. If you read the post I was responding to you would have recognized the context and understood me. The post I replied to said something along the lines of "what's wrong with this guy?". I was simply saying why I thought he did it.
If I were you I wouldn't hold my breath.
There are still a lot of God Fearing people out there who believe that the sexual act Gays indulge is and abomination.
I've seen you enough to know an appropriate lean, but that's neither here nor there. Basically you endorsed highly illegal and seditious activity by an "officer of the court". No amount of morality will make me side with that.
I like to think I don't fit in with any party, but your opinion is somewhat accurate in that I agree with some Liberal ideas. I didn't endorse it, I provided my reasoning for why it happened.
Here is a flash for you my left wing friend....Gay marriage is not legal in Pa.
No, it's not. And the issuer should be reprimanded. WTF is wrong with people? Some paper shuffler can't decide on his own that same-sex marriage is legal. Ridiculous.
Not in your life time my left wing friend. The SCOTUS will not touch states the have a constitutional banning SSM.
The SCOTUS would not touch a state constitutional amendment with a 10 foot poll.
C'mon...this isn't judicial activism. This is enforcing laws already on the book.
It'd be judicial activism if it was the other way around.
Oh, and the clerk should be fired.
Yes it can be unconstitutional and in a STATE constitution because no constitutional amendment has to stand Judicial scrutiny BEFORE it is ratified. Our judicial system rests on an injured party bringing a case before the Court.
The SSM marriage ban/definition as one man/one woman could be seen under judical review as violating the equal treatment under the law provision. How could the SSM ban still remain?
What's your point? That it's okay to be rude to those who don't fall in line with DISNEYdude?
No Maggie....the point is that being "old" is not an excuse for intolerance and bigotry. There are a lot of old people who are enlightened and tolerant. The difference is the aren't angry stubborn and uneducated.
When we can't respect our grandparents (or whoever) because they can't move fast enough to center, it's you and I that are intolerant. Not them.
A Constitutional amendment, once ratified, cannot - repeat cannot - be held unconstitutional. I repeat the question - How can something in the Constitution be unconstitutional? Answer? It can't. We're not talking about unratified proposed constitutional amendments. We're talking about actual constitutional amendments. Could a state constitutional amendment be held in violation of the U.S. Constitution? Of course, but that's not what we're talking about.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?