And self-important, underachieving liberals have a long-standing tendency to pull crap out of their asses, wrap it in a predisposed "study", and use it to invent new ways to tax the people that are kicking their collective ass.
Actually its the other way around.
It's a good job then that AGW has nothing to do with liberalism and everything to do with science.
As far as I'm concerned, scientists have a far better track record of not pulling stuff out of their asses than either liberal or conservative politicians.
Nope, its konservatives that their heads permanently bolted up rush limbaugh's anus,
which explains why they are unable to explain, in their own words, any of the concepts they want to discuss.
If you disagree, prove it: please entertain us--explain the current global warming issue in your own words. . .
If you can't, it means, it means you qualify as one of the aforementioned cranio-limbaugh-anal individuals.
That is absolutely and entirely not what the study says. What it says is that the most extreme models are probably not accurate and more moderate models likely, which is not what you would call unexpected. It does not create any doubt about man made effects on climate change. Here is the actual study: Comparing the model-simulated global warming signal to observations using empirical estimates of unforced noise : Scientific Reports : Nature Publishing Group
sure... like the paid off shills of scientists we see on display here.. and where do their grants come from?...maybe Hillary got a "donation"
what liberals will believe makes fairy tales look like science
PS: its snowing on your front yard now.. Al Gore says it is..
It's a good job then that AGW has nothing to do with liberalism and everything to do with science.
As far as I'm concerned, scientists have a far better track record of not pulling stuff out of their asses than either liberal or conservative politicians.
Yeah the same shills of scientists that put us on the moon.
Nope, its konservatives that their heads permanently bolted up rush limbaugh's anus,
which explains why they are unable to explain, in their own words, any of the concepts they want to discuss.
If you disagree, prove it: explain the current global warming issue in your own words. . .
If you can't, it means, it means you qualify as one of the aforementioned cranio-limbaugh-anal individuals.
Yeah the same shills of scientists that put us on the moon.
Funny how they're only shills when you want them to be. Selective shillyness.
travis doesn't know anything about science. Try it--ask him to explain the scientific method--he can't.
I take issue when that science becomes grossly distorted and misrepresented through the prism of politics and our sensationalist media.
travis doesn't know anything about science. Try it--ask him to explain the scientific method--he can't.
LOL.. those are not the same ones....LOL...
NASA hates the liberals..
That's the right wing habit--distorting science, i. e. claiming the Earth is some 4000 years old, etc.--to win over their dumb, uneducated flock.
NASA are one of the biggest proponents of AGW dum dum.
NASA: Climate Change and Global Warming
Do your research.
That's the right wing habit--distorting science, i. e. claiming the Earth is some 4000 years old, etc.--to win over their dumb, uneducated flock.
NASA are one of the biggest proponents of AGW dum dum.
NASA: Climate Change and Global Warming
Do your research.
I wish you guys were a bit more concerned with right and wrong rather than scoring smartie points for whats right or left. It simply ruins potentially interesting threads like this one
It's a good job then that AGW has nothing to do with liberalism and everything to do with science.
As far as I'm concerned, scientists have a far better track record of not pulling stuff out of their asses than either liberal or conservative politicians.
sure... they hate the Liberals..
Its all about Obama with the Liberal and controlling us through fear... next we will have rationing due to this junk
100 years ago we hardly could measure temperature consistently...
Don't you have enough US subforums here where you can tediously flip the bird at one another :yawn:
I wish you guys were a bit more concerned with right and wrong rather than scoring smartie points for whats right or left.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?