When it comes to asset forfeiture the burden is on the Oligarchs to provide evidence how they legally obtained all of their monies.
It has become abundantly clear you do not understand what you are trying to argue here.
That's not what this article explains: Russian oligarchs' 'seized' assets are in legal limbo in the US
Also, others are questioning this from a legal standpoint - Russian yacht seizures by the US could provoke a legal nightmare
Ah so you're not anti-war but rather simply anti-American.
For some countries you're here to apologize for their warfare, for the U.S. you're here to criticize simple sanctions in response to a war as the "epitome of injustice".
We're not the ones doing this one, and it is not us meeting out "injustice" here.
If you want some villains look no further than the folks invading their neighbors for territory, and spare me the lecture.
If they are working so poorly why are Russian proxies online complaining so much?
^This is what indoctrinated paranoia looks like.Officials Seizing Russian Yachts Now May Steal Americans' Property in the Future
A slippery slope that nobody cares about until it's turned on you.
No offense, but I'm not interested in discussions/"debates" that go nowhere or backwards.
Any evidence they are not?It's being abused regularly at local, state, and federal levels. In the case of the Russian yacht owners, it's being used to pressure and punish Putin by squeezing his alleged influencers. The question is: what crimes are they being accused of that afforded them the luxury of such a commodity, and can the US show evidence aligned with international law?
Any evidence they are not?
Provide the basis for your claim of unconstitutionality.Guilty until I can prove innocence! Meanwhile, say goodbye to property rights!
Folks, this is today's left. They don't believe in the Constitution, BoR, or rule of law.
Provide the basis for your claim of unconstitutionality.
Folks, this is today's right. They don't believe in the Constitution, BoR, or rule of law.
Speaking of caring less, your interpretation of SCOTUS decisions is weak. Why is it still Constitutional?4th Amendment. The articles I've linked throughout this thread address the legal problems.
You haven't read them, and I could care less.
Speaking of caring less, your interpretation of SCOTUS decisions is weak. Why is it still Constitutional?
SC has unconstitutional laws? Color me shocked. A state decision has zero impact on the rest of America. If you mean my side is working to make current laws more fair and clear you're right.The work has begun and it's working it's way through the system.
South Carolina Judge Declares Civil Forfeiture Unconstitutional
ACLU: Asset Forfeiture Abuse
Police Say Seizing Property Without Trial Helps Keep Crime Down. A New Study Shows They’re Wrong.
And btw, this is your team leading the charge against it. But since I brought it up, you feel the need to argue against me.
LOL. Go ahead, prove to me your team is wrong about something.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?