I've never seen anything like this. With endless long lists of names with yeses next to them, how is anyone suppose to know they've been nominated?
I don't know do you know if he was nominated?
I nominated him # and it was accepted.
Its the only way I know of to contact all the participants who wish to be contacted. If you have a better method I am game because, to be blunt that's a lot of typing, and I type with the T-Rex method of typing. You are nominated by the way, for president of the convention. Do you wish to run for president of the convention bar keep?
Its the only way I know of to contact all the participants who wish to be contacted. If you have a better method I am game because, to be blunt that's a lot of typing, and I type with the T-Rex method of typing. You are nominated by the way, for president of the convention. Do you wish to run for president of the convention bar keep?
I see my name in the list, but haven't been contacted. Where's the disconnect?
Maybe having everyone subscribe to the thread would work better? It puts the onus on the members and they selectively not subscribe to threads that they don't care to participate in.
That would probably work best in conjunction with our own subforum since people wouldn't then have to wade through the Constitution forum looking for new convention threads. Or perhaps if a subforum isn't on the horizon prefixing all "our" threads with "Convention: " or something similar. Anything to set our threads off from the rest
It was added late I think. I wouldn't expect perfection. We are an ad hoch team trying to keep up. Do you wish accept?
I see 2 or 3 people working independently, and not as a team. Some are in such a haste that no one can keep up. This is suppose to be fun. Based on that I would say NO.
That was for secretary of the convention. We went though this thread and he has not be nominated for president. If you still think he was nominated for president please point to the post number in THIS thread and I will see to it is put on the ballot. As of now haymarket is only nominated for secretary of the convention.
My mistake: these threads are getting a little confusing...
I've never seen anything like this. With endless long lists of names with yeses next to them, how is anyone suppose to know they've been nominated?
Blue = I haven't heard from the nominee.
Green = Has accepted the nomination or was self nominated.
Red = Has declined to accept the nomination.
AlbqOwl (withdrawn)
American (don't know)
Fletch (don't know)
Kal'Stang (withdrawn)
Korimyr the Rat (don't know)
Paleocon (solid nomination)
PirateMk1 (withdrawn)
Psychoclown (solid nomination)
sangha (solid nomination)
TurtleDude (withdrawn)
Your Star (solid nomination)
I'm a little lost on how we are going about this as well. We seem to have way too many nominees for what should be process control, not authoritarian control.
The co-secretaries are in disagreement about the nominees.
Paleocon has presented this list:
Paleocon
sangha
vasuderatorrent has presented this list:
1. American
2. Fletch
3. Korimyr the Rat
4. Paleocon
5. Psychoclown
6. sangha
7. Your Star
Which one are we going to work with?
The co-secretaries are in disagreement about the nominees.
Paleocon has presented this list:
Paleocon
sangha
vasuderatorrent has presented this list:
1. American
2. Fletch
3. Korimyr the Rat
4. Paleocon
5. Psychoclown
6. sangha
7. Your Star
Which one are we going to work with?
This post makes things more clear.
This post makes things more clear.
I say we go with yours. You PM'd all of the nominees and the once that accepted said yes. So that is the one we should go with.