- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
- Messages
- 54,914
- Reaction score
- 51,782
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
There's nothing in Constitution about syphilis or gonorrhea either. The Founding Fathers had more important issues to deal with. Does that mean venereal diseases are unconstitutional?
No mention of beer either.
Beer and SCOTUS are forever linked…No mention of beer either.
Why doesn't "People" comprise men and women? The document doesn't mention premature ejaculation, impotence, bedwetting either. People covers it all.The point is that they did not consider women to exist as persons. Since, presumably, it is no longer possible to believe such a thing, how can relying on text that makes that assumption be reasonably used to support an argument?
There's nothing in Constitution about syphilis or gonorrhea either. The Founding Fathers had more important issues to deal with. Does that mean venereal diseases are unconstitutional?
Why doesn't "People" comprise men and women? The document doesn't mention premature ejaculation, impotence, bedwetting either. People covers it all.
No mention of beer either.
Kinda went over your head, didn't it?Do you equate premature ejaculation with women?
I doubt that. Insightfulness and progressiveness are oxymoronic.Some very curious responses here, but it is helping me understand the anti-choice crowd a little better.
No mention of beer either.
Take out the word "either" and you are correct. There is a lot about abortion in the Constitution.
Really? Can you cite just a few of those (many?) references?
I love this article from the top law school in America:
Physically Intrusive Abortion Restrictions as Fourth Amendment Searches and Seizures - Harvard Law Review
Successful challenges to abortion restrictions have typically been brought under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and considered within a right-to-privacy framework. However, legal...harvardlawreview.org
I see no reason abortion should be exempted from the HIPAA law, which is based on . .. the Fourth Amendment. If her medical papers and decisions are private in every other department, why not gynecology and obstetrics?
OK, so basically you just lied to get attention.
How about that, a former moderator personally attacking me with a stupid lie.
Nonsense because you said “There is a lot about abortion in the Constitution.” which is a lie.
How about that, a former moderator personally attacking me with a stupid lie.
Show me exactly what makes a totally unbiased, objective, factual link from the nation's top college of law a lie just to get attention?
That link is not from the Constitution, which was your claim.
Answer my question.
If what I posted was a lie, you would have undeniable proof from a totally unbiased source (such as Harvard College of Law) that my statement is not true.
If you keep editing your posts it makes it very hard to reply to them.
I never claimed it was from the Constitution. It explains the Constitutional right to privacy includes abortions.
There is a lot about abortion in the Constitution.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?