- Joined
- Dec 1, 2011
- Messages
- 33,000
- Reaction score
- 13,973
- Location
- FL - Daytona
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Strangely enough my issues with Obama in 08 wasn't largely based around his foreign policy stances regarding national defense because...to be frank...I trusted George W. Bush's statement to him that he should hold off on making promises until he see's the intel. Every bit of contacts I have within the various fields that touch the Intelligence world hint to a reality different than what a lot of average people think or assume. Obama following much of Bush's path, with natural evolutoins and with political camoflauge at times, didn't shock me in the least.
It's funny...Nicholson's speech in a Few Good Men was meant to be portrayed as a bad thing it seems, and yet in many ways it rings true. What's beyond that Wall is a nasty, nasty thing and people have the stomach to bitch about it only because they don't have to be the ones on that wall.
If Obama supposedly has an Assassination List, and that list includes 17-year-olds and American citizens, does he deserve his Noble Peace Prize?
traitors deserve to die.
...snip....
Fights are nasty things...whether it's a one on one ally brawl or full scale war. There's nothing really pretty or sweet or clean about them. They are dirty, nasty, ugly things that sometimes are necessary despite that dirty, nasty, and ugliness. Those of us who don't have to be involved in those fights...we are lucky in that we get to mostly keep our hands clean and enjoy the benefits of those who don't. However, the more we attempt to convince ourselves that somehow our little bubble world is no different than the nasty, dirty, ugly one they live in and the more we try to tell them how they need to survive in that world of theirs then the closer and closer we get to a time where that nasty, dirty, ugly world is going to end up popping that bubble....and god help all those idiots who think they know how to handle the muck at that point in time.
I think rather than widen the scope of this conflict over cultural, geopolitical and strategic resources we (Obama) could've started to scale down and negotiate from a stance of firm but peaceful resolve. The continuation of drone assassinations involving innocent casualties only deepens the divide and creates more recruits for the fanatical resistance against US interests. We could keep an eye on the more aggressive campaigns and camps without going after every cell loosely affiliated. I think sometimes the more tempered the responses the less interested the adversary is in continuing their long term plans.
Historically many peace accords and conflict resolutions came after intense offensives and there should be a winding down of the tactics we use to strike first.
traitors deserve to die.
I wonder how many paranoid gun nuts think that they're on this list.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?